diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
initializer; all other constexpr variables are merely required to be
initialized. In particular, a user-provided constexpr default constructor can be
used for such initialization.
llvm-svn: 144028
default", make a note of which is used when creating the
initial declaration. Previously, we would wait until later to handle
default/delete as a definition, but this is too late: when adding the
declaration, we already treated the declaration as "user-provided"
when in fact it was merely "user-declared".
Fixes PR10861 and PR10442, along with a bunch of FIXMEs.
llvm-svn: 144011
We'd also like for "C++11" or "c++11" to be used for the warning
groups, but without removing the old warning flags. Patches welcome;
I've run out of time to work on this today.
llvm-svn: 141801
We had an extension which allowed const static class members of floating-point type to have in-class initializers, 'as a C++0x extension'. However, C++0x does not allow this. The extension has been kept, and extended to all literal types in C++0x mode (with a fixit to add the 'constexpr' specifier).
llvm-svn: 140801
that they are C++0x extensions, and put them in the appropriate
group. We already support most of the semantics. Addresses
<rdar://problem/9407525>.
llvm-svn: 131153
named by the nested-name-specifier is same or base of the class in which the member expression appears.
It seems we also had an ill-formed test case, mon dieu! Fixes rdar://8576107.
llvm-svn: 129493
has not yet been parsed, note that the default argument hasn't been
parsed and keep track of all of the instantiations of that function
parameter. When its default argument does get parsed, imbue the
instantiations with that default argument. Fixes PR8245.
llvm-svn: 116324
only form pointers-to-member if the expression has the appropriate
form. This avoids assertions later on on invalid code, but also
allows us to properly resolve mixed-staticity overloads.
llvm-svn: 111987
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
- When instantiating a friend type template, perform semantic
analysis on the resulting type.
- Downgrade the errors concerning friend type declarations that do
not refer to classes to ExtWarns in C++98/03. C++0x allows
practically any type to be befriended, and ignores the friend
declaration if the type is not a class.
llvm-svn: 100635
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
are for out of line declarations more easily. This simplifies the logic and
handles the case of out-of-line class definitions correctly. Fixes PR6107.
llvm-svn: 96729
Richard Smith