The 128/256 bit version of these instructions require an 'x' or 'y' suffix to
disambiguate the memory form in att syntax.
We were allowing the same suffix in intel syntax, but it appears gas does not
do that.
gas does allow the 'x' and 'y' suffix on register and broadcast forms even
though its not needed. We were allowing it on unmasked register form, but not on
masked versions or on masked or unmasked broadcast form.
While there fix some test coverage holes so they can be extended with the 'x'
and 'y' suffix tests.
llvm-svn: 359418
Summary:
We should always be able to accept AVX512 registers and instructions in llvm-mc. The only subtarget mode that should be checked is 16-bit vs 32-bit vs 64-bit mode.
I've also removed all the mattr/mcpu lines from test RUN lines to be consistent with this. Most were due to AVX512, but a few were for other features.
Fixes PR36202
Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, bkramer
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42824
llvm-svn: 324106
-Don't print the 'x' suffix for the 128-bit reg/mem VEX encoded instructions in Intel syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Don't print the 'y' suffix for the 256-bit reg/reg VEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with the EVEX versions.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes to be used for the reg/mem forms when we're assembling using Intel syntax.
-Allow the 'x' and 'y' suffixes on the reg/reg EVEX encoded instructions in Intel or AT&T syntax. This is consistent with what VEX was already allowing.
This should fix at least some of PR28850.
llvm-svn: 286787
Added intrinsics for the instructions. CC parameter of the intrinsics was changed from i8 to i32 according to the spec.
By Igor Breger (igor.breger@intel.com)
llvm-svn: 236714
Craig Topper