This patch fixes demangling of template aliases as template-template
arguments, and also fixes function pointers and references as
not type template parameters. All of these can be properly
demangled now, so I've ported over the test
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ms-template-callbacks.cpp. All of these
tests pass
llvm-svn: 338340
Any of these template argument kinds can be represented with an expression, so
accept them in this constructor.
Patch by Balaji Iyer!
rdar://41459965
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49766
llvm-svn: 338338
Also refactors some existing code to materialize addresses for the large code
model so it can be shared between G_GLOBAL_VALUE and G_BLOCK_ADDR.
This implements PR36390.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49903
llvm-svn: 338337
When emitting a bug report, it is important to highlight which argument of the
call-expression is causing the problem.
Before:
warning: Null pointer argument in call to string comparison function
strcmp(a, b);
^~~~~~~~~~~~
After:
warning: Null pointer argument in call to string comparison function
strcmp(a, b);
^ ~
Affects other output modes as well, not just text.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50028
llvm-svn: 338333
Summary:
Before my change, BlockingMutex used Windows critial sections. Critical
sections can only be initialized by calling InitializeCriticalSection,
dynamically.
The primary sanitizer allocator expects to be able to reinterpret zero
initialized memory as a BlockingMutex and immediately lock it.
RegionInfo contains a mutex, and it placement new is never called for
it. These objects are accessed via:
RegionInfo *GetRegionInfo(uptr class_id) const {
DCHECK_LT(class_id, kNumClasses);
RegionInfo *regions = reinterpret_cast<RegionInfo *>(SpaceEnd());
return ®ions[class_id];
}
The memory comes from the OS without any other initialization.
For various reasons described in the comments, BlockingMutex::Lock would
check if the object appeared to be zero-initialized, and it would lazily
call the LinkerInitialized constructor to initialize the critical
section. This pattern is obviously racy, and the code had a bunch of
FIXMEs about it.
The best fix here is to use slim reader writer locks, which can start
out zero-initialized. They are available starting in Windows Vista. I
think it's safe to go ahead and use them today.
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49893
llvm-svn: 338331
The vector contains the SDNodes that these functions create. The number of nodes is always a small number so we should use SmallVector to avoid a heap allocation.
llvm-svn: 338329
This patch adds support for demangling r-value references, new
operators such as the ""_foo operator, lambdas, alias types,
nullptr_t, and various other C++11'isms.
There is 1 failing test remaining in this file, which appears to
be related to back-referencing. This type of problem has the
potential to get ugly so I'd rather fix it in a separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50013
llvm-svn: 338324
Summary:
This patch mostly copies the existing Instruction Flow, and stage descriptions
from the mca README. I made a few text tweaks, but no semantic changes,
and made reference to the "default pipeline." I also removed the internals
references (e.g., reference to class names and header files). I did leave the
LSUnit name around, but only as an abbreviated word for the load-store unit.
Reviewers: andreadb, courbet, RKSimon, gbedwell, filcab
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49692
llvm-svn: 338319
This is exchanging a sub-of-1 with add-of-minus-1:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/plKAH
This is another step towards improving select-of-constants codegen (see D48970).
x86 is the motivating target, and those diffs all appear to be wins. PPC and AArch64 look neutral.
I've limited this to early combining (!LegalOperations) in case a target wants to reverse it, but
I think canonicalizing to 'add' is more likely to produce further transforms because we have more
folds for 'add'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49924
llvm-svn: 338317
Do not warn when the other message-send-expression is correctly wrapped
in a different autorelease pool.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49921
llvm-svn: 338314
From the bug report, the runtime needs to initialize the nproc variables
(inside middle init) for each root when the task is encountered, otherwise,
a segfault can occur.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36720
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49996
llvm-svn: 338313
Summary:
We usually don't have trailing newlines in the short help strings. This just adds
unnecessary extra lines when printing the help text of these commands.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50015
llvm-svn: 338311
The patch introduces dominator analysis for VPBlockBases and extend
VPlan's GraphTraits specialization with the required interfaces. Dominator
analysis will be necessary to perform some H-CFG transformations and
to introduce VPLoopInfo (LoopInfo analysis on top of the VPlan representation).
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, mkuper, hfinkel, mssimpso
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48815
llvm-svn: 338310
Summary:
This patch adds a new macro _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VECTOR_EXTENSION for detecting
whether a vector extension (\_\_attribute\_\_((vector_size(num_bytes)))) is
available.
On the top of that, this patch implements the following API:
* all constructors
* operator[]
* copy_from
* copy_to
It also defines simd_abi::native to use vector extension, if available.
In GCC and Clang, certain values with vector extension are passed by registers,
instead of memory.
Based on D41148.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MaskRay, lichray, sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41376
llvm-svn: 338309
Just to be consistent with the rest.
I should have done that in the commit itself, but the filepaths
is one thing i forgot to verify :S
llvm-svn: 338307
Yes, i erroneously assumed that the "after" was meant,
but i was wrong:
> I really meant "performed before", for cases like 4u / -2,
> where -2 is implicitly converted to UINT_MAX - 2 before
> the computation. Conversions that are performed after
> a computation aren't part of the computation at all,
> so I think it's much clearer that they're not in scope
> for this sanitizer.
llvm-svn: 338306
Also, make SerializationTraits for pairs forward the actual pair
template type arguments to the underlying serializer. This allows, for example,
std::pair<StringRef, bool> to be passed as an argument to an RPC call expecting
a std::pair<std::string, bool>, since there is an underlying serializer from
StringRef to std::string that can be used.
llvm-svn: 338305
OpenCL block literal structs have different fields which are now correctly
identified in the debug info.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49930
llvm-svn: 338299
Thinking about it more it might be possible for the later nodes to be folded in getNode in such a way that the other created nodes are left dead. This can cause use counts to be incorrect on nodes that aren't dead.
So its probably safer to leave this alone.
llvm-svn: 338298
The Builder sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android is failing
starting with rL338287 / D48959.
It runs the tests via android_compile.py, so i'm not sure this
is actually *this* issue:
https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=316
but this seems oddly similar to the other XFAIL'ed cases...
Right now that seems to be the only failing builder,
so i *think* it makes sense to try to just blacklist it for now.
llvm-svn: 338296
Summary:
When OMPT is not supported the __kmp_omp_task() function is passed the parameters in the wrong order. This is a fix related to patch D47709.
Reviewers: Hahnfeld, sconvent, caomhin, jlpeyton
Reviewed By: Hahnfeld
Subscribers: guansong, openmp-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50001
llvm-svn: 338295
Summary:
The lib paths are not correctly picked up for OpenEmbedded sysroots (like arm-oe-linux-gnueabi) for 2 reasons:
1. OpenEmbedded sysroots are of the form <sysroot>/usr/lib/<triple>/x.y.z. This form is handled in clang but only for Freescale vendor.
2. 64-bit OpenEmbedded sysroots may not have a /usr/lib dir. So they cannot find /usr/lib64 as it is referenced as /usr/lib/../lib64 in clang.
This is a follow-up to the llvm patch: D48861
Reviewers: dlj, rengolin, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, hfinkel, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rsmith, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48862
llvm-svn: 338294
Summary:
Normally, inling does not happen if caller does not have
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" attibute but callee has it.
However, alwaysinline may force callee to be inlined.
In this case, if the caller has the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute, copy the attribute to caller.
Reviewers: efriedma, a.elovikov, lebedev.ri, jyknight
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50000
llvm-svn: 338292
This test fails if clang is configure with, for example, gold as the
default linker. It does not appear that this test really relies on lld
so make the checks accept ld, ld.gold and ld.bfd too.
llvm-svn: 338290
Zachary Turner