The function FoldSingleEntryPHINodes() is changed to return if
it has changed IR or not. This return value is used by RS4GC to
set the MadeChange flag respectively.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93810
Currently undef is used as a don’t-care vector when constructing a vector using a series of insertelement.
However, this is problematic because undef isn’t undefined enough.
Especially, a sequence of insertelement can be optimized to shufflevector, but using undef as its placeholder makes shufflevector a poison-blocking instruction because undef cannot be optimized to poison.
This makes a few straightforward optimizations incorrect, such as:
```
; https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44185
define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
%xv = insertelement <4 x float> %q, float %x, i32 2
%r = shufflevector <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %xv, <4 x i32> { 0, 6, 2, undef }
ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] is undef
}
=>
define <4 x float> @insert_not_undef_shuffle_translate_commute(float %x, <4 x float> %y, <4 x float> %q) {
%r = insertelement <4 x float> %y, float %x, i32 1
ret <4 x float> %r ; %r[3] = %y[3], incorrect if %y[3] = poison
}
Transformation doesn't verify!
ERROR: Target is more poisonous than source
```
I’d like to suggest
1. Using poison as insertelement’s placeholder value (IRBuilder::CreateVectorSplat should be patched too)
2. Updating shufflevector’s semantics to return poison element if mask is undef
Note that poison is currently lowered into UNDEF in SelDag, so codegen part is okay.
m_Undef() matches PoisonValue as well, so existing optimizations will still fire.
The only concern is hidden miscompilations that will go incorrect when poison constant is given.
A conservative way is copying all tests having `insertelement undef` & replacing it with `insertelement poison` & run Alive2 on it, but it will create many tests and people won’t like it. :(
Instead, I’ll simply locally maintain the tests and run Alive2.
If there is any bug found, I’ll report it.
Relevant links: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43958 , http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-November/137242.html
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93586
This patch updates isImpliedCondition/isKnownNonZero to look into select form of
and/or as well.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93845
This patch updates GVN to correctly return the modified status, if PRE
is performed on indices. It fixes a crash when building the test-suite
with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS and LTO.
EarlyCSE's handleBranchCondition says:
```
// If the condition is AND operation, we can propagate its operands into the
// true branch. If it is OR operation, we can propagate them into the false
// branch.
```
This holds for the corresponding select patterns as well.
This is a part of an ongoing work for disabling buggy select->and/or transformations.
See llvm.org/pr48353 and D93065 for more context
Proof:
and: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/MQWodU
or: https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/9GLbB_
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93842
This patch makes GVN recognize `select c1, c2, false` as well as `select c1, true, c2`
branch condition and propagate equality from these.
See llvm.org/pr48353, D93065
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93841
Previously the branch from the middle block to the scalar preheader & exit
was being set-up at the end of skeleton creation in completeLoopSkeleton.
Inserting SCEV or runtime checks may result in LCSSA phis being created,
if they are required. Adjusting branches afterwards may break those
PHIs.
To avoid this, we can instead create the branch from the middle block
to the exit after we created the middle block, so we have the final CFG
before potentially adjusting/creating PHIs.
This fixes a crash for the included test case. For the non-crashing
case, this is almost a NFC with respect to the generated code. The
only change is the order of the predecessors of the involved branch
targets.
Note an assertion was moved from LoopVersioning() to
LoopVersioning::versionLoop. Adjusting the branches means loop-simplify
form may be broken before constructing LoopVersioning. But LV only uses
LoopVersioning to annotate the loop instructions with !noalias metadata,
which does not require loop-simplify form.
This is a fix for an existing issue uncovered by D93317.
Following the discussion in D93065, this adds m_LogicalAnd() and
m_LogicalOr() matchers, that match A && B and A || B logical
operations, either as bitwise operations or select expressions.
As an example usage, LVI is adapted to use these matchers for its
condition reasoning.
The plan here is to switch other parts of LLVM that reason about
and/or of conditions to also support the select forms, and then
merge D93065 (or a variant thereof) to disable the poison-unsafe
select to and/or transform.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93827
If neon is disabled, LowerCTPOP will return SDValue() to indicate
that normal legalization should be used. However, ReplaceNodeResults
does not check for this and pushes the empty SDValue() onto the
result vector, which will subsequently result in a crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93825
The tests don't work with remote debugservers. This isn't a problem with
any particular test, but the test infrastructure itself, which is why
each of these tests has a @skipIfDarwinEmbedded decorator.
This patch replaces that with a central category-based solution. It also
moves the ad-hoc windows skipping mechanism there too.
We weren't consistently marking unary instructions as OneInput
and vid.v is really ZeroInput but we had no way to mark that.
This patch improves this by removing the error prone OneInput constraint.
Instead we just always look for the mask in the last operand.
It appears that the "CheckReg" variable used for the check on the broken
instruction was unitialized or garbage because it was also used for
VS1/VS2 constraints. I've scoped the variable locally to each check now.
I've gone through and set NoConstraint on instructions that don't have
a real VMConstraint and don't have a mask as the last operand.
I've also removed the unused enum values in RISCVBaseInfo.h. We
never use them in C++ and we have separate versions in a td file.
Reviewed By: HsiangKai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93784
Implement Bug 46698, making ODS synthesize a getType() method that returns a
specific C++ class for OneResult methods where we know that class. This eliminates
a common source of casts in things like:
myOp.getType().cast<FIRRTLType>().getPassive()
because we know that myOp always returns a FIRRTLType. This also encourages
op authors to type their results more tightly (which is also good for
verification).
I chose to implement this by splitting the OneResult trait into itself plus a
OneTypedResult trait, given that many things are using `hasTrait<OneResult>`
to conditionalize various logic.
While this changes makes many many ops get more specific getType() results, it
is generally drop-in compatible with the previous behavior because 'x.cast<T>()'
is allowed when x is already known to be a T. The one exception to this is that
we need declarations of the types used by ops, which is why a couple headers
needed additional #includes.
I updated a few things in tree to remove the now-redundant `.cast<>`'s, but there
are probably many more than can be removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93790
I am hoping to extend the reduction matching code, and it is
hard to distinguish "ReductionData" from "ReducedValueData".
So extend the tree/root metaphor to include leaves.
Another problem is that the name "OperationData" does not
provide insight into its purpose. I'm not sure if we can alter
that underlying data structure to make the code clearer.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
This is a tentative fix which addresses a PR raise regarding Case indentation when working with Whitesmiths Indentation
I could not find online any reference sources as to what the case indentation for Whitesmith's should be (or be allowed to be)
But according to the documentation, we don't obey the rules for Whitesmith's
```
In particular, the documentation states that this option is to "indent case labels one level from the switch statement. When false, use the same indentation level as for the switch statement."
```
The behaviour we add here is actually as the TODO in the tests used to state in {D67627}, but when {D82016} was added and I brought these tests out from being TODO I realized I changed the indentation.
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93806
In 35676a4f9a I've added handling for
non-trivial dominating conditions that imply non-zero on the true
branch. This adds the same support for the false branch.
The changes in pr45360.ll change block ordering and naming, but
don't change the control flow. The urem is still guaraded by a
non-zero check correctly.
Add tests for non-trivial conditions that imply non-zero on the
false branch rather than the true branch.
The last case already folds due to canonicalization.
Define vwredsumu/vwredsum/vfwredosum/vfwredsum
We work with @rogfer01 from BSC to come out this patch.
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93807
The dominating condition handling in isKnownNonZero() currently
only takes into account conditions of the form "x != 0" or "x == 0".
However, there are plenty of other conditions that imply non-zero,
a common one being "x s> 0".
Peculiarly, the handling for assumes was already dealing with more
general non-zero-ness conditions, so this just reuses the same
logic for the dominating condition case.
Check conditions that imply non-zero, even if they are not literally
"x != 0".
Using ctlz for testing, as explicit comparison might get folded by
other reasoning.
D71264 started using a context instruction in a computeKnownBits()
call. However, if aliasing between two GEPs is checked, then the
choice of context instruction will be different for alias(GEP1, GEP2)
and alias(GEP2, GEP1), which is not supposed to happen.
Resolve this by remembering which GEP a certain VarIndex belongs to,
and use that as the context instruction. This makes the choice of
context instruction predictable and symmetric.
It should be noted that this choice of context instruction is
non-optimal (just like the previous choice): The AA query result is
only valid at points that are reachable from *both* instructions.
Using either one of them is conservatively correct, but a larger
context may also be valid to use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93183
1. Add new methods to Async runtime API to support yielding async values
2. Add lowering from `async.yield` with value payload to the new runtime API calls
`async.value` lowering requires that payload type is convertible to LLVM and supported by `llvm.mlir.cast` (DialectCast) operation.
Reviewed By: csigg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93592
OpenMP 4.5 - Variables that appear in expressions for statement function definitions
may not appear in OpenMP Private, Firstprivate or Lastprivate clauses.
Test case : omp-private03.f90
Reviewed By: kiranchandramohan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93213
Fangrui Song