to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: XRayRecords now includes a PID field. Basic handlers fetch pid and tid each time they are called instead of caching the value. Added a testcase that calls fork and checks if the child TID is different from the parent TID to verify that the processes' TID are different in the trace.
Reviewers: dberris, Maknee
Reviewed By: dberris, Maknee
Subscribers: kpw, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49025
llvm-svn: 336769
Summary:
Turns out sizeof(packed) isn't as strong as we'd hoped. This makes sure
that when we initialize the padding, all 12 bytes will be zero.
Reviewers: dberris, kpw, eizan
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42494
llvm-svn: 323755
Summary:
This change allows the XRay basic (naive) mode logging implementation to
start writing the payload entries through the arg1 logging handler. This
implementation writes out the records that the llvm-xray tool and the
trace reader library will start processing in D38550.
This introduces a new payload record type which logs the data through
the in-memory buffer. It uses the same size/alignment that the normal
XRay record entries use. We use a new record type to indicate these new
entries, so that the trace reader library in LLVM can start reading
these entries.
Depends on D38550.
Reviewers: pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38551
llvm-svn: 314968
Summary:
This change starts differentiating tail exits from normal exits. We also
increase the version number of the "naive" log to version 2, which will
be the starting version where these records start appearing. In FDR mode
we treat the tail exits as normal exits, and are thus subject to the
same treatment with regard to record unwriting.
Updating the version number is important to signal older builds of the
llvm-xray tool that do not deal with the tail exit records must fail
early (and that users should only use the llvm-xray tool built after
the support for tail exits to get accurate handling of these records).
Depends on D37964.
Reviewers: kpw, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37965
llvm-svn: 313515
Summary:
This change attempts to remove all the dependencies we have on
std::mutex and any std::shared_ptr construction in global variables. We
instead use raw pointers to these objects, and construct them on the
heap. In cases where it's possible, we lazily initialize these pointers.
While we do not have a replacement for std::shared_ptr yet in
compiler-rt, we use this work-around to avoid having to statically
initialize the objects as globals. Subsequent changes should allow us to
completely remove our dependency on std::shared_ptr and instead have our
own implementation of the std::shared_ptr and std::weak_ptr semantics
(or completely rewrite the implementaton to not need these
standard-library provided abstractions).
Reviewers: dblaikie, kpw, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36078
llvm-svn: 309792
Summary:
Currently the FDR log writer, upon flushing, dumps a sequence of buffers from
its freelist to disk. A reader can read the first buffer up to an EOB record,
but then it is unclear how far ahead to scan to find the next threads traces.
There are a few ways to handle this problem.
1. The reader has externalized knowledge of the buffer size.
2. The size of buffers is in the file header or otherwise encoded in the log.
3. Only write out the portion of the buffer with records. When released, the
buffers are marked with a size.
4. The reader looks for memory that matches a pattern and synchronizes on it.
2 and 3 seem the most flexible and 2 does not rule 3 out.
This is an implementation of 2.
In addition, the function handler for fdr more aggressively checks for
finalization and makes an attempt to release its buffer.
Reviewers: pelikan, dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31384
llvm-svn: 298982
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 293015
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 290852
Depends on D21612 which implements the building blocks for the compiler-rt
implementation of the XRay runtime. We use a naive in-memory log of fixed-size
entries that get written out to a log file when the buffers are full, and when
the thread exits.
This implementation lays some foundations on to allowing for more complex XRay
records to be written to the log in subsequent changes. It also defines the format
that the function call accounting tool in D21987 will start building upon.
Once D21987 lands, we should be able to start defining more tests using that tool
once the function call accounting tool becomes part of the llvm distribution.
Reviewers: echristo, kcc, rnk, eugenis, majnemer, rSerge
Subscribers: sdardis, rSerge, dberris, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, majnemer, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21982
llvm-svn: 279805
Chandler Carruth