function-like macro. Clang will attempt to correct the arguments by detecting
braced initializer lists:
1) If possible, suggest parentheses around arguments
containing braced lists which will give the proper number of arguments.
2) If a braced list is detected at the start of a macro argument, it cannot be
corrected by parentheses. Instead, just point out the location of these
braced lists.
llvm-svn: 186971
This is still a fairly odd test. Clang wants to run gcc for assembling. At
least with -### it only prints that instead of actually trying to run it with
-ccc-echo.
llvm-svn: 186945
These are cases where a scalar type is "destructed", usually due to
template instantiation (e.g. "obj.~T()", where 'T' is 'int'). This has
no actual effect and the analyzer should just skip over it.
llvm-svn: 186927
The analyzer doesn't currently expect CFG blocks with terminators to be
empty, but this can happen when generating conditional destructors for
a complex logical expression, such as (a && (b || Temp{})). Moreover,
the branch conditions for these expressions are not persisted in the
state. Even for handling noreturn destructors this needs more work.
This reverts r186498.
llvm-svn: 186925
bool, half, pointers and structs / unions containing any
of these are not allowed. Does not yet reject size_t and
related integer types that are also disallowed.
llvm-svn: 186908
Switch some warnings over to errors which should never have been warnings
in the first place. (Also, a minor fix to the preprocessor rules for
integer literals while I'm here.)
llvm-svn: 186903
Based on Peter Collingbourne's destructor patches.
Prior to this change, clang was considering ?1 to be the complete
destructor and the base destructor, which was wrong. This lead to
crashes when clang tried to emit two LLVM functions with the same name.
In this ABI, TUs with non-inline dtors might not emit a complete
destructor. They are emitted as inline thunks in TUs that need them,
and they always delegate to the base dtors of the complete class and its
virtual bases. This change uses the DeferredDecls machinery to emit
complete dtors as needed.
Currently in clang try body destructors can catch exceptions thrown by
virtual base destructors. In the Microsoft C++ ABI, clang may not have
the destructor definition, in which case clang won't wrap the virtual
virtual base destructor calls in a try-catch. Diagnosing this in user
code is TODO.
Finally, for classes that don't use virtual inheritance, MSVC always
calls the base destructor (?1) directly. This is a useful code size
optimization that avoids emitting lots of extra thunks or aliases.
Implementing it also means our existing tests continue to pass, and is
consistent with MSVC's output.
We can do the same for Itanium by tweaking GetAddrOfCXXDestructor, but
it will require further testing.
Reviewers: rjmccall
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1066
llvm-svn: 186828
A constructor for an abstract class does not call constructors for virtual
base classes, so it is not an error if no initializer is present for the
virtual base and the virtual base cannot be default initialized.
Also provide a (disabled by default, for now) warning for the case where a
virtual base class's initializer is ignored in an abstract class's constructor,
and address a defect in DR257 where it was not carried through to C++11's rules
for implicit deletion of special member functions.
Based on a patch by Maurice Bos.
llvm-svn: 186803
optimize, to follow the permissions granted in N3664. Under those rules, only
calls generated by new-expressions and delete-expressions are permitted to be
optimized, and direct calls to ::operator new and ::operator delete must be
treated as normal calls.
llvm-svn: 186799
The functionality is equivalent to the GCC attribute. Variables of tagged
types will be warned about as unused if they are not used in any way
except for possible (even non-trivial) ctors/dtors called. Useful for tagging
classes like std::string (which is not part of this commit).
llvm-svn: 186765
Every #include is surrounded by #if 0 in order to comment it out, which adds
lines. That is fixed up right after, but that all can be inside #if part
that is not processed, so fix up also after every end of a conditional part.
llvm-svn: 186763
A class with a field of non-POD-for-layout type is not POD-for-layout.
This computation should not depend on whether the field is of POD type
in the language sense.
Fixes PR16537.
Patch by Josh Magee.
llvm-svn: 186741
This is the same way GenericSelectionExpr works, and it's generally a
more consistent approach.
A large part of this patch is devoted to caching the value of the condition
of a ChooseExpr; it's needed to avoid threading an ASTContext into
IgnoreParens().
Fixes <rdar://problem/14438917>.
llvm-svn: 186738
Aaron Ballman