(re-apply r268810 as it exposed an uninitialized variable in ARM MFI.
Patch 268868 should fix that.)
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: vitalybuka, aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268869
(this is resubmit of r268529 with minor refactoring. r268529 was reverted
at r268536 due a memory sanitizer failure. I have not been able to
reproduce that failure and I checked all the variable used in my change
but I could not spot an issue. I did some refactoring and see if it will
give a clearer hint)
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: vitalybuka, aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268810
Summary:
Currently, when checking if a stack is "BigStack" or not, it doesn't count into spills and arguments. Therefore, LLVM won't reserve spill slot for this actually "BigStack". This may cause scavenger failure.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19896
llvm-svn: 268529
Weiming Zhao