We try to perform this transform in InstSimplify but we aren't always
able to. Sometimes, we need to insert a bitcast if X and Y don't have
the same time.
llvm-svn: 216598
We supported transforming:
(gep i8* X, -(ptrtoint Y))
to:
(inttoptr (sub (ptrtoint X), (ptrtoint Y)))
However, this only fired if 'X' had type i8*. Generalize this to
support various types of different sizes. This results in much better
CodeGen, especially for pointers to packed structs.
llvm-svn: 216523
(X >> Z) & (Y >> Z) -> (X&Y) >> Z for all shifts.
(X >> Z) | (Y >> Z) -> (X|Y) >> Z for all shifts.
(X >> Z) ^ (Y >> Z) -> (X^Y) >> Z for all shifts.
These patterns were previously handled separately in visitAnd()/visitOr()/visitXor().
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4951
llvm-svn: 216443
Adding, removing, or changing non-pack parameters can change the ABI
classification of pack parameters. Clang and other frontends encode the
classification in the IR of the call site, but the callee side
determines it dynamically based on the number of registers consumed so
far. Changing the prototype affects the number of registers consumed
would break such code.
Dead argument elimination performs a similar task and already has a
similar check to avoid this problem.
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
llvm-svn: 216421
Take a StringRef instead of a "const char *".
Take a "std::error_code &" instead of a "std::string &" for error.
A create static method would be even better, but this patch is already a bit too
big.
llvm-svn: 216393
GlobalDCE deletes global vars and updates their initializers to nullptr
while leaving underlying constants to be cleaned up later by its uses.
The clean up may never happen, fix this by forcing it every time it's
safe to destroy constants.
Final patch by Rafael Espindola
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4931
<rdar://problem/17523868>
llvm-svn: 216390
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)
llvm-svn: 216371
CFE, with -03, would turn:
bool f(unsigned x) {
bool a = x & 1;
bool b = x & 2;
return a | b;
}
into:
%1 = lshr i32 %x, 1
%2 = or i32 %1, %x
%3 = and i32 %2, 1
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
This sort of thing exposes a nasty pathology in GCC, ICC and LLVM.
Instead, we would rather want:
%1 = and i32 %x, 3
%2 = icmp ne i32 %1, 0
Things get a bit more interesting in the following case:
%1 = lshr i32 %x, %y
%2 = or i32 %1, %x
%3 = and i32 %2, 1
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
Replacing it with the following sequence is better:
%1 = shl nuw i32 1, %y
%2 = or i32 %1, 1
%3 = and i32 %2, %x
%4 = icmp ne i32 %3, 0
This sequence is preferable because %1 doesn't involve %x and could
potentially be hoisted out of loops if it is invariant; only perform
this transform in the non-constant case if we know we won't increase
register pressure.
llvm-svn: 216343
Summary:
Fixes PR20425.
During slice building, if all of the incoming values of a PHI node are the same, replace the PHI node with the common value. This simplification makes alloca's used by PHI nodes easier to promote.
Test Plan: Added three more tests in phi-and-select.ll
Reviewers: nlewycky, eliben, meheff, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: zinovy.nis, hfinkel, baldrick, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4659
llvm-svn: 216299
Consider:
%add = add nuw i32 %a, -16777216
%and = and i32 %add, 255
Regardless of whether or not we demand the sign bit of %add, we cannot
replace -16777216 with 2130706432 without also removing 'nuw' from the
instruction.
llvm-svn: 216273
Consider:
%add = add nsw i32 %a, -16777216
%and = and i32 %add, 255
Regardless of whether or not we demand the sign bit of %add, we cannot
replace -16777216 with 2130706432 without also removing 'nsw' from the
instruction.
This fixes PR20377.
llvm-svn: 216261
In unreachable blocks it's legal to have instructions like "%x = op %x".
Such instuctions are not schedulable. Therefore the SLPVectorizer has to check for
unreachable blocks and ignore them.
Fixes bug 20646.
llvm-svn: 216256
In this case, we are creating an x86_fp80 slice for a union from C where
the padding bytes may contain real data. An x86_fp80 alloca is 16 bytes,
and that's just fine. We can't, however, use regular loads and stores to
access the slice, because the store size is only 10 bytes / 80 bits.
Instead, use memcpy and memset.
Fixes PR18726.
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5012
llvm-svn: 216248
Somewhat unnoticed in the original implementation of discriminators, but
it could cause instructions to end up in new, small,
DW_TAG_lexical_blocks due to the use of DILexicalBlock to track
discriminator changes.
Instead, use DILexicalBlockFile which we already use to track file
changes without introducing new scopes, so it works well to track
discriminator changes in the same way.
llvm-svn: 216239
This does not require -ffast-math, and it gives CSE/GVN more options to
eliminate duplicate expressions in, e.g.:
return ((x + 0.1234 * y) * (x - 0.1234 * y));
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4904
llvm-svn: 216169
Currently only "add nsw" are widened. This patch eliminates tons of "sext" instructions for 64 bit code (and the corresponding target code) in cases like:
int N = 100;
float **A;
void foo(int x0, int x1)
{
float * A_cur = &A[0][0];
float * A_next = &A[1][0];
for(int x = x0; x < x1; ++x).
{
// Currently only [x+N] case is widened. Others 2 cases lead to sext.
// This patch fixes it, so all 3 cases do not need sext.
const float div = A_cur[x + N] + A_cur[x - N] + A_cur[x * N];
A_next[x] = div;
}
}
...
> clang++ test.cpp -march=core-avx2 -Ofast -fno-unroll-loops -fno-tree-vectorize -S -o -
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4695
llvm-svn: 216160
If we have a scalar reduction, we can increase the critical path length if the loop we're unrolling is inside another loop. Limit, by default to 2, so the critical path only gets increased by one reduction operation.
llvm-svn: 216140
Because declarations of these functions can appear in places like autoconf
checks, they have to be handled somehow, even though we do not support
vararg custom functions. We do so by printing a warning and calling the
uninstrumented function, as we do for unimplemented functions.
llvm-svn: 216042
We can prove that a 'sub' can be a 'sub nsw' under certain conditions:
- The sign bits of the operands is the same.
- Both operands have more than 1 sign bit.
The subtraction cannot be a signed overflow in either case.
llvm-svn: 216037
Previously, the hint mechanism relied on clean up passes to remove redundant
metadata, which still showed up if running opt at low levels of optimization.
That also has shown that multiple nodes of the same type, but with different
values could still coexist, even if temporary, and cause confusion if the
next pass got the wrong value.
This patch makes sure that, if metadata already exists in a loop, the hint
mechanism will never append a new node, but always replace the existing one.
It also enhances the algorithm to cope with more metadata types in the future
by just adding a new type, not a lot of code.
llvm-svn: 215994
While this might seem like an obvious canonicalization, there is one subtle problem with it. The result of the original expression
is undef when x is NaN (remember, fast math flags), but the result of the select is always defined when x is NaN. This means that the
new expression is strictly more defined than the original one. One unfortunate consequence of this is that the transform is not reversible!
It's always legal to make increase the defined-ness of an expression, but it's not legal to reduce it. Thus, targets that prefer the original
form of the expression cannot reverse the transform to recover it. Another way to think of it is that the transform has lost source-level
information (the fast math flags), which is undesirable.
llvm-svn: 215825
While *most* (X sdiv 1) operations will get caught by InstSimplify, it
is still possible for a sdiv to appear in the worklist which hasn't been
simplified yet.
This means that it is possible for 0 - (X sdiv 1) to get transformed
into (X sdiv -1); dividing by -1 can make the transform produce undef
values instead of the proper result.
Sorry for the lack of testcase, it's a bit problematic because it relies
on the exact order of operations in the worklist.
llvm-svn: 215818
David Majnemer