Currently instructions are folded very aggressively for AArch64 into the memory
operation, which can lead to the use of killed operands:
%vreg1<def> = ADDXri %vreg0<kill>, 2
%vreg2<def> = LDRBBui %vreg0, 2
... = ... %vreg1 ...
This usually happens when the result is also used by another non-memory
instruction in the same basic block, or any instruction in another basic block.
This fix teaches hasTrivialKill to not only check the LLVM IR that the value has
a single use, but also to check if the register that represents that value has
already been used. This can happen when the instruction with the use was folded
into another instruction (in this particular case a load instruction).
This fixes rdar://problem/18142857.
llvm-svn: 216634
Summary:
Introduce support::ulittleX_t::ref type to Support/Endian.h and use it in x86 JIT
to enforce correct endianness and fix unaligned accesses.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: ributzka, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5011
llvm-svn: 216631
This patch allows invalid DynamicLibrary instances to be
constructed, and fixes the const-correctness of the isValid()
method.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 216571
This teaches the AArch64 backend to deal with the operations required
to deal with the operations on v4f16 and v8f16 which are exposed by
NEON intrinsics, plus the add, sub, mul and div operations.
llvm-svn: 216555
The attached patch simplifies a few interfaces that don't need to take
ownership of a buffer.
For example, both parseAssembly and parseBitcodeFile will parse the
entire buffer before returning. There is no need to take ownership.
Using a MemoryBufferRef makes it obvious in the type signature that
there is no ownership transfer.
llvm-svn: 216488
consider:
long long *f(long long *b, long long *e) {
return b + (e - b);
}
we would lower this to something like:
define i64* @f(i64* %b, i64* %e) {
%1 = ptrtoint i64* %e to i64
%2 = ptrtoint i64* %b to i64
%3 = sub i64 %1, %2
%4 = ashr exact i64 %3, 3
%5 = getelementptr inbounds i64* %b, i64 %4
ret i64* %5
}
This should fold away to just 'e'.
N.B. This adds m_SpecificInt as a convenient way to match against a
particular 64-bit integer when using LLVM's match interface.
llvm-svn: 216439
Take a StringRef instead of a "const char *".
Take a "std::error_code &" instead of a "std::string &" for error.
A create static method would be even better, but this patch is already a bit too
big.
llvm-svn: 216393
This patch adds support to recognize division by uniform power of 2 and modifies the cost table to vectorize division by uniform power of 2 whenever possible.
Updates Cost model for Loop and SLP Vectorizer.The cost table is currently only updated for X86 backend.
Thanks to Hal, Andrea, Sanjay for the review. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D4971)
llvm-svn: 216371
This was added in r134994, to fix a memory leak;
three days later, r135248 switched
ContainedTys from being new-allocated to being allocated
via BumpPtrAllocator, and the earlier fix was never
reverted.
The destructor doesn't seem to ever actually be called
on Types anyway, so it's harmless, but if it were,
this'd be an invalid pointer.
This reverts r134994.
llvm-svn: 216354
This does nothing but remove the Record from the map, and
then re-add it, without actually changing it in between.
The Record's Name used to be changed before re-adding it
when the code was first committed in r137232, but the
name-changing lines were removed in r142510, and since
then this code seems to do nothing.
This was also the only caller of removeClass or removeDef,
so now RecordKeeper owns its Records unconditionally,
and could be unique_ptr-ified.
llvm-svn: 216349
Based on the STL class of the same name, it guards a mutex
while also allowing it to be unlocked conditionally before
destruction.
This eliminates the last naked usages of mutexes in LLVM and
clang.
It also uncovered and fixed a bug in callExternalFunction()
when compiled without USE_LIBFFI, where the mutex would never
be unlocked if the end of the function was reached.
llvm-svn: 216338
There's no need to do this if the user doesn't call va_start. In the
future, we're going to have thunks that forward these register
parameters with musttail calls, and they won't need these spills for
handling va_start.
Most of the test suite changes are adding va_start calls to existing
tests to keep things working.
llvm-svn: 216294
This patch contains the LLVM side of the fix of PR17239.
This bug that happens because the /link (clang-cl.exe argument) is
marked as "consume all remaining arguments". However, when inside a
response file, /link should only consume all remaining arguments inside
the response file where it is located, not the entire command line after
expansion.
My patch will change the semantics of the RemainingArgsClass kind to
always consume only until the end of the response file when the option
originally came from a response file. There are only two options in this
class: dash dash (--) and /link.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4899
Patch by Rafael Auler!
llvm-svn: 216280
This (mostly) reverts commit r216119.
Somewhere during the review Reid committed r214980 which fixed this
another way, and I neglected to check that the testcase still failed
before committing.
I've left test/CodeGen/X86/aligned-variadic.ll around in case it adds
extra coverage.
llvm-svn: 216246
Somewhat unnoticed in the original implementation of discriminators, but
it could cause instructions to end up in new, small,
DW_TAG_lexical_blocks due to the use of DILexicalBlock to track
discriminator changes.
Instead, use DILexicalBlockFile which we already use to track file
changes without introducing new scopes, so it works well to track
discriminator changes in the same way.
llvm-svn: 216239
isPow2DivCheap
That name doesn't specify signed or unsigned.
Lazy as I am, I eventually read the function and variable comments. It turns out that this is strictly about signed div. But I discovered that the comments are wrong:
srl/add/sra
is not the general sequence for signed integer division by power-of-2. We need one more 'sra':
sra/srl/add/sra
That's the sequence produced in DAGCombiner. The first 'sra' may be removed when dividing by exactly '2', but that's a special case.
This patch corrects the comments, changes the name of the flag bit, and changes the name of the accessor methods.
No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5010
llvm-svn: 216237
AtomicExpandLoadLinked is currently rather ARM-specific. This patch is the first of
a group that aim at making it more target-independent. See
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-August/075873.html
for details
The command line option is "atomic-expand"
llvm-svn: 216231
The profile data format was recently updated and the new indexing api
requires the code coverage tool to know the function's hash as well
as the function's name to get the execution counts for a function.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4994
llvm-svn: 216207
In both Clang and LLVM, this is a common pattern:
Size = sizeof(DeclRefExpr) + SomeExtraStuff;
void *Mem = Context.Allocate(Size, llvm::alignOf<DeclRefExpr>());
return new (Mem) DeclRefExpr(...);
The annoying thing is that because the default placement-new operator has a
nothrow specification, the compiler will insert a null check of Mem before
calling the DeclRefExpr constructor. This null check is redundant for us,
because we expect the allocation functions to never return null.
By annotating the allocator functions with returns_nonnull, we can optimize
away these checks. Compiling clang with a recent version of Clang and measuring
with:
$ perf stat -r20 bin/clang.patch -fsyntax-only -w gcc.c && perf stat -r20 bin/clang.orig -fsyntax-only -w gcc.c
Shows a 2.4% speed-up (+- 0.8%).
The pattern occurs in LLVM too. Measuring with -O3 (and now using bzip2.c
instead, because it's smaller):
$ perf stat -r20 bin/clang.patch -O3 -w bzip2.c && perf stat -r20 bin/clang.orig -O3 -w bzip2.c
Shows 4.4 % speed-up (+- 1%).
If anyone knows of a similar attribute we can use for MSVC, or some other
technique to get rid off the null check there, please let me know.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4989
llvm-svn: 216192
Juergen Ributzka