r355343 was landed and was reverted in r355363 due to build breakage.
This patch adds Linux/Windows support on top of r355343.
In this patch, Darwin should be working with testing case. Linux should be working,
I will enable the testing case in a follwup diff. Windows/Other should be building.
Correct implementation for Other platforms will be added.
Thanks David for reviewing the original diff, helping me with issues on Linux, and
giving suggestions for adding support for Other platforms.
llvm-svn: 355701
Summary:
The changes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44847 cause load time failure
due to lprofMergeValueProfData in Android libs enabled with profile generation:
"dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol "lprofMergeValueProfData" referenced by..."
Marking lprofMergeValueProfData as hidden so the correct in-module definition
is picked by the linker.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: efriedma, xur, davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55893
llvm-svn: 354064
Summary:
Before this change, check-profile would run, but all tests would be
marked unsupported on Windows. This is the new status of 'check-profile'
after this change:
Testing Time: 6.66s
Expected Passes : 29
Expected Failures : 5
Unsupported Tests : 39
I moved many tests that exercise posix-y features like dlopen and DSOs
into the Posix subdirectory, and ran the tests on Linux to validate my
changes.
These are the remaining tests that I handled on a case by case basis:
- instrprof-path.c
Passes, Fixed some path portability issues
- instrprof-gcov-exceptions.test
Passes, the FileCheck actually succeeds on Windows, so I RUNX'd it
- instrprof-icall-promo.test
XFAILed, probably due to C++ ABI differences in vtables
- instrprof-merge-match.test
- instrprof-merge.c
- instrprof-merging.cpp
XFAILed, These seem like real bugs that need fixing
- instrprof-version-mismatch.c
XFAILed, Overriding the weak version symbol doesn't work
- instrprof-without-libc.c
UNSUPPORTED, test needs an executable symbol table, Windows has none
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, void
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57853
llvm-svn: 353435
Summary: Add a test for coverage for function definition like void foo() { }.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53601
llvm-svn: 345625
Summary:
The goal of the patch in D49853 is to display counter on the line of function definition.
So some tests need to be fixed.
Reviewers: marco-c, davidxl
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: sylvestre.ledru, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49854
llvm-svn: 344229
Summary:
The goal of D49916 is to remove some hit counters from lines like '}'.
So as a consequence, the tests must be fixed.
FYI, after holidays, I'll add more tests.
Reviewers: marco-c, davidxl
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers, sylvestre.ledru
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49917
llvm-svn: 342718
Summary: Some tests are broken if patch in D49659 is accepted so this patch fixes them.
Reviewers: marco-c
Reviewed By: marco-c
Subscribers: dberris, delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49721
llvm-svn: 342661
Right now, the counters are added in regards of the number of successors
for a given BasicBlock: it's good when we've only 1 or 2 successors (at
least with BranchInstr). But in the case of a switch statement, the
BasicBlock after switch has several predecessors and we need know from
which BB we're coming from.
So the idea is to revert what we're doing: add a PHINode in each block
which will select the counter according to the incoming BB. They're
several pros for doing that:
- we fix the "switch" bug
- we remove the function call to "__llvm_gcov_indirect_counter_increment"
and the lookup table stuff
- we replace by PHINodes, so the optimizer will probably makes a better
job.
Patch by calixte!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51619
llvm-svn: 341977
Summary:
This will make the behavior of __gcov_flush match the GCC behavior.
I would like to rename __gcov_flush to __llvm_gcov_flush (in case of programs linking to libraries built with different compilers), but I guess we can't for compatibility reasons.
Reviewers: davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: samsonov, vitalybuka, pcc, kcc, junbuml, glider, fhahn, eugenis, dvyukov, davidxl, srhines, chh, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48538
llvm-svn: 336365
__gcov_flush is hidden.
For applications to dump profiling data of selected .so files,
they can use dlsym to find and call llvm_gcov_flush in each .so file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45454
llvm-svn: 336019
Another CFG optimisation patch (280364) has broken bad profile tests, and this
is a similar attempt to fix the test without changing the semantics.
llvm-svn: 280373
(Part-1 merging API is in profile runtime)
This patch implements a portable file opening API
with exclusive access for the process. In-process
profile merge requires profile file update to be
atomic/fully sychronized.
llvm-svn: 271864
Make sure inline virtual function's address is properly recorded and
dumped in raw profile so that value profiling does not loss tracking.
(Second part of the test will be enabled after the lowering bug is fixed
in LLVM)
llvm-svn: 271528
Manman Ren