Much of PR32037's compile time regression is due to getTargetConstantBitsFromNode always creating large (>64bit) APInts during the bitcasting from the source data to the destination bitwidth.
This commit avoids this bitcast stage if the data is already the correct bitwidth.
llvm-svn: 305284
This step is just intended to reduce code duplication rather than change any functionality.
A follow-up would be to replace PPCTargetLowering::spliceIntoChain() usage with this new helper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33649
llvm-svn: 305192
First possible step towards merging SSE/AVX memory folding pattern fragments.
Also allows us to remove the duplicate non-temporal load logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33902
llvm-svn: 305184
I was looking closer at the x86 test diffs in D33866, and the first change seems like it
shouldn't happen in the first place. So this patch will resolve that.
Using Agner's tables and AMD docs, vperm2f128 and vinsertf128 have identical timing for
any given CPU model, so we should be able to interchange those without affecting perf.
But as we can see in some of the diffs here, using vperm2f128 allows load folding, so
we should take that opportunity to reduce code size and register pressure.
A secondary advantage is making AVX1 and AVX2 codegen more similar. Given that vperm2f128
was introduced with AVX1, we should be selecting it in all of the same situations that we
would with AVX2. If there's some reason that an AVX1 CPU would not want to use this
instruction, that should be fixed up in a later pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33938
llvm-svn: 305171
If we know that both operands of an unsigned integer vector comparison are non-negative,
then it's safe to directly use a signed-compare-greater-than instruction (the only non-equality
integer vector compare predicate provided by SSE/AVX).
We're intentionally not changing the condition code to signed in order to preserve the
existing transforms that use min/max/psubus below here.
This should solve PR33276:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33276
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33862
llvm-svn: 304909
This creates a new library called BinaryFormat that has all of
the headers from llvm/Support containing structure and layout
definitions for various types of binary formats like dwarf, coff,
elf, etc as well as the code for identifying a file from its
magic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33843
llvm-svn: 304864
Summary:
The patch makes instruction count the highest priority for
LSR solution for X86 (previously registers had highest priority).
Reviewers: qcolombet
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30562
From: Evgeny Stupachenko <evstupac@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 304824
Summary:
Expanding the loop idiom test for memcpy to also recognize
unordered atomic memcpy. The only difference for recognizing
an unordered atomic memcpy and instead of a normal memcpy is
that the loads and/or stores involved are unordered atomic operations.
Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html
Patch by Daniel Neilson!
Reviewers: reames, anna, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames, anna
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33243
llvm-svn: 304806
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
In testing, we've found yet another miscompile caused by the new tables.
And this one is even less clear how to fix (we could teach it to fold
a 16-bit load instead of the 32-bit load it wants, or block folding
entirely).
Also, the approach to excluding instructions seems increasingly to not
scale well.
I have left a more detailed analysis on the review log for the original
patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32684) along with suggested path
forward. I will land an additional test case that I wrote which covers
the code that was miscompiling (folding into the output of `pextrw`) in
a subsequent commit to keep this a pure revert.
For each commit reverted here, I've restricted the revert to the
non-test code touching the x86 fold table emission until the last commit
where I did revert the test updates. This means the *new* test cases
added for `insertps` and `xchg` remain untouched (and continue to pass).
Reverted commits:
r304540: [X86] Don't fold into memory operands into insertps in the ...
r304347: [TableGen] Adapt more places to getValueAsString now ...
r304163: [X86] Don't fold away the memory operand of an xchg.
r304123: Don't capture a temporary std::string in a StringRef.
r304122: Resubmit "[X86] Adding new LLVM TableGen backend that ..."
Original commit was in r304088, and after a string of fixes was reverted
previously in r304121 to fix build bots, and then re-landed in r304122.
llvm-svn: 304762
We currently generate BUILD_VECTOR as a tree of UNPCKL shuffles of the same type:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 2, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 1>
Step 2: unpcklps X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
The issue is because we are not placing sequential vector elements together early enough, we fail to recognise many combinable patterns - consecutive scalar loads, extractions etc.
Instead, this patch unpacks progressively larger sequential vector elements together:
e.g. for v4f32:
Step 1: unpcklps 0, 2 ==> X: <?, ?, 1, 0>
: unpcklps 1, 3 ==> Y: <?, ?, 3, 2>
Step 2: unpcklpd X, Y ==> <3, 2, 1, 0>
This does mean that we are creating UNPCKL shuffle of different value types, but the relevant combines that benefit from this are quite capable of handling the additional BITCASTs that are now included in the shuffle tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33864
llvm-svn: 304688
Since r288804, we try to lower build_vectors on AVX using broadcasts of
float/double. However, when we broadcast integer values that happen to
have a NaN float bitpattern, we lose the NaN payload, thereby changing
the integer value being broadcast.
This is caused by ConstantFP::get, to which we pass the splat i32 as
a float (by bitcasting it using bitsToFloat). ConstantFP::get takes
a double parameter, so we end up lossily converting a single-precision
NaN to double-precision.
Instead, avoid any kinds of conversions by directly building an APFloat
from the splatted APInt.
Note that this also fixes another piece of code (broadcast of
subvectors), that currently isn't susceptible to the same problem.
Also note that we could really just use APInt and ConstantInt
throughout: the constant pool type doesn't matter much. Still, for
consistency, use the appropriate type.
llvm-svn: 304590
This might give a few better opportunities to optimize these to memcpy
rather than loops - also a few minor cleanups (StringRef-izing,
templating (to avoid std::function indirection), etc).
The SmallVector::assign(iter, iter) could be improved with the use of
SFINAE, but the (iter, iter) ctor and append(iter, iter) need it to and
don't have it - so, workaround it for now rather than bothering with the
added complexity.
(also, as noted in the added FIXME, these assign ops could potentially
be optimized better at least for non-trivially-copyable types)
llvm-svn: 304566
Summary:
Add an early combine to match patterns such as:
(i16 bitcast (v16i1 x))
->
(i16 movmsk (v16i8 sext (v16i1 x)))
This combine needs to happen early enough before
type-legalization scalarizes the result of the setcc.
Reviewers: igorb, craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: delena, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33311
llvm-svn: 304406
Summary:
This is a continuation of the work started in D29872 . Passing the carry down as a value rather than as a glue allows for further optimizations. Introducing setcccarry makes the use of addc/subc unecessary and we can start the removal process.
This patch only introduce the optimization strictly required to get the same level of optimization as was available before nothing more.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33374
llvm-svn: 304404
Summary: LiveRangeShrink pass moves instruction right after the definition with the same BB if the instruction and its operands all have more than one use. This pass is inexpensive and guarantees optimal live-range within BB.
Reviewers: davidxl, wmi, hfinkel, MatzeB, andreadb
Reviewed By: MatzeB, andreadb
Subscribers: hiraditya, jyknight, sanjoy, skatkov, gberry, jholewinski, qcolombet, javed.absar, krytarowski, atrick, spatel, RKSimon, andreadb, MatzeB, mehdi_amini, mgorny, efriedma, davide, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32563
llvm-svn: 304371
After transforming FP to ST registers:
- Do not add the ST register to the livein lists, they are reserved so
we do not need to track their liveness.
- Remove the FP registers from the livein lists, they don't have defs or
uses anymore and so are not live.
- (The setKillFlags() call is moved to an earlier place as it relies on
the FP registers still being present in the livein list.)
llvm-svn: 304342
This adds a callback to the LLVMTargetMachine that lets target indicate
that they do not pass the machine verifier checks in all cases yet.
This is intended to be a temporary measure while the targets are fixed
allowing us to enable the machine verifier by default with
EXPENSIVE_CHECKS enabled!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33696
llvm-svn: 304320
The frame pointer (when used as frame pointer) is a reserved register.
We do not track liveness of reserved registers and hence do not need to
add them to the basic block livein lists.
llvm-svn: 304274
TargetPassConfig is not useful for targets that do not use the CodeGen
library, so we may just as well store a pointer to an
LLVMTargetMachine instead of just to a TargetMachine.
While at it, also change the constructor to take a reference instead of a
pointer as the TM must not be nullptr.
llvm-svn: 304247
Summary:
Currently FPOWI defaults to Legal and LegalizeDAG.cpp turns Legal into Expand for this opcode because Legal is a "lie".
This patch changes the default for this opcode to Expand and removes the hack from LegalizeDAG.cpp. It also removes all the code in the targets that set this opcode to Expand themselves since they can just rely on the default.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, nemanjai, javed.absar, andrew.w.kaylor, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33530
llvm-svn: 304215
This was reverted due to buildbot breakages and I was not familiar
with this code to investigate it. But while trying to get a
useful backtrace for the author, it turns out the fix was very
obvious. Resubmitting this patch as is, and will submit the
fix in a followup so that the fix is not hidden in the larger
CL.
llvm-svn: 304122
This reverts commit 28cb1003507f287726f43c771024a1dc102c45fe as well
as all subsequent followups. llvm-tblgen currently segfaults with
this change, and it seems it has been broken on the bots all
day with no fixes in preparation. See, for example:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86-windows-msvc2015/
llvm-svn: 304121
X86 backend holds huge tables in order to map between the register and memory forms of each instruction.
This TableGen Backend automatically generated all these tables with the appropriate flags for each entry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32684
llvm-svn: 304088
Some register-register instructions can be encoded in 2 different ways, this happens when 2 register operands can be folded (separately).
For example if we look at the MOV8rr and MOV8rr_REV, both instructions perform exactly the same operation, but are encoded differently. Here is the relevant information about these instructions from Intel's 64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual:
Opcode Instruction Op/En 64-Bit Mode Compat/Leg Mode Description
8A /r MOV r8,r/m8 RM Valid Valid Move r/m8 to r8.
88 /r MOV r/m8,r8 MR Valid Valid Move r8 to r/m8.
Here we can see that in order to enable the folding of the output and input registers, we had to define 2 "encodings", and as a result we got 2 move 8-bit register-register instructions.
In the X86 backend, we define both of these instructions, usually one has a regular name (MOV8rr) while the other has "_REV" suffix (MOV8rr_REV), must be marked with isCodeGenOnly flag and is not emitted from CodeGen.
Automatically generating the memory folding tables relies on matching encodings of instructions, but in these cases where we want to map both memory forms of the mov 8-bit (MOV8rm & MOV8mr) to MOV8rr (not to MOV8rr_REV) we have to somehow point from the MOV8rr_REV to the "regular" appropriate instruction which in this case is MOV8rr.
This field enable this "pointing" mechanism - which is used in the TableGen backend for generating memory folding tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32683
llvm-svn: 304087
Simon Pilgrim