-r --gc-sections is usually not useful because it just makes intermediate output
smaller. https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46700#c7 mentions a use case:
validating the absence of undefined symbols ealier than in the final link.
After D84129 (SHT_GROUP support in -r links), we can support -r
--gc-sections without extra code. So let's allow it.
Reviewed By: grimar, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84131
This patch clarifies the failing point of having input or output vectors
of differing types. Before, lowering would fail elsewhere (e.g. in
`fmul` creation) which may have been not immediately clear.
As a side effect, the `getElementType` and `getVectoryTy` functions
required the `const` qualifier to be added.
Reviewers: fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84374
This patch refactors `emitDebugInfo()` to make the length field be
inferred from its content. Besides, the `Visitor` class is removed in
this patch. The original `Visitor` class helps us determine an
appropriate length and emit the .debug_info section. These two
processes can be merged into one process. Besides, the length field
should be inferred when it's missing rather than when it's zero.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84008
This patch helps pull out some common helper functions for range list
and location list tables. NFC.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84383
When passing the -vector feature to LLVM (or equivalently the
-mno-vx command line argument to clang), the intent is that
generated code must not use any vector features (in particular,
no vector registers must be used).
However, there are some cases where we still could generate
such uses; these are all related to some of the additional
vector features (like +vector-enhancements-1). Since none
of those features are actually usable with -vector, just make
sure we disable them all if -vector is given.
Currently there are plenty of instructions that SCEVExpander creates but
does not track as created. IRBuilder allows specifying a callback
whenever an instruction is inserted. Use this to call
rememberInstruction automatically for each created instruction.
There are still a few rememberInstruction calls remaining, because in
some cases Inst::Create functions are used to construct instructions.
Suggested by @lebedev.ri in D75980.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, reames, sanjoy.google, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84326
This change replaces std::make_unique with manual construction of
std::unique_ptr to make the tests compatible with C++11
(std::make_unique is a C++14 feature).
libc++ supports std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr even in C++03 but
with some limitations: unique_ptr_array.pass.cpp and
shared_ptr_arg.pass.cpp fail to compile in C++03 mode and need to be
disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84394
Add support in LegalizerHelper for lowering G_SADDSAT etc. either
using add/subtract-with-overflow or using max/min instructions.
Enable this lowering for AMDGPU so it can be tested. The legalization
rules are still approximate and skips out on using the clamp bit to
treat these as legal, which has never been used before. This also
doesn't yet try to deal with expanding SALU cases.
The test is quite frafile, as the check lines match IR numbers and it is
not obvious why only a very small subset is checked.
Re-generate check lines, so further changes are more obvious.
The patch was reverted 27d52cd86a because of failures in
TestWeakSymbols.py. These have now been addressed in D83552.
The original commit message was:
This function was documented to overwrite entries with D76111, which was
adding a couple of similar functions. However, this function (unlike the
functions added in that patch) was/is not actually overwriting variables
-- any pre-existing variables would get ignored.
This behavior does not seem to be intentional. In fact, before the refactor in
D41359, this function could introduce duplicate entries, which could
have very surprising effects both inside lldb and on other applications
(some applications would take the first value, some the second one; in
lldb, attempting to unset a variable could make the second variable
become active, etc.).
Overwriting seems to be the most reasonable behavior here, so change the
code to match documentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83306
Summary:
This is the next patch of [[ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76210 | D76210 ]].
This patch made a map in `InformationCache` for caching results.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, sstefan1, uenoku, homerdin, baziotis
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, uenoku, kuter, bbn, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83246
Summary: We do this already for output operands, but missed it for (non-tied) input operands.
Reviewers: arsenm, Petar.Avramovic
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, hiraditya, llvm-commits, kerbowa
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83763
This patch fixes a test failure in TestHistoryRecall caused by the move
of the `history` subcommand to the `session` command.
This change was introduced by commit 85fbb08fa2.
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
This patch moves the `history` subcommand from the `command` to `session`
command. I think it makes more sense to have it there because as the `command`
usage suggests, it should be used to manage custom LLDB commands.
However, `history` is essentially tied to a debugging session and holds
all the commands (not specifically custom ones).
This also makes it more discoverable by adding an alias for it (mimicking
the shell builtin).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84307
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
On systems where size() doesn't return unsigned long, this leads to an
overloading mismatch. Convert the constant to whatever type is used for
Q.size() on the system.
Currently popFromQueueImpl iterates over all candidates to find the best
one. While the candidate queue is small, this is not a problem. But it
becomes a problem once the queue gets larger. For example, the snippet
below takes 330s to compile with llc -O0, but completes in 3s with this
patch.
define void @test(i4000000* %ptr) {
entry:
store i4000000 0, i4000000* %ptr, align 4
ret void
}
This patch limits the number of candidates to check to 1000. This limit
ensures that it never triggers for test-suite/SPEC2000/SPEC2006 on X86
and AArch64 with -O3, while still drastically limiting the compile-time
in case of very large queues.
It would be even better to use a binary heap to manage to queue
(D83335), but some heuristics change the score of a node in the queue
after another node has been scheduled. I plan to address this for
backends that use the MachineScheduler in the future, but that requires
a more careful evaluation. In the meantime, the limit should help users
impacted by this issue.
The patch includes a slightly smaller version of the motivating example
as test case, to guard against the issue.
Reviewers: efriedma, paquette, niravd
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84328
Right now there is a branching for 2 functions based on whether target map has
symbols or not. In this commit these functions are merged into one.
Furthermore, emitting does not require inverse and map applying as it computes
the correct Range in a single step and thus reduces unnecessary overhead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83756
linalg.conv does not support memrefs with rank smaller than 3 as stated here:
https://www.tensorflow.org/versions/r2.0/api_docs/python/tf/nn/convolution
However it does not verify it and thus crashes with "LLVM ERROR: out of memory"
error for 1D case and "nWin > 0 && "expected at least one window dimension"" assertion
for 2D case. This commit adds check for that in the verification method.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84317
The lambda being used to check whether locales are supported was always
passing the value of alts from the last loop iteration due to the way that
python lambda captures work. Fix this by using a default argument capture.
To help debug future similar issues I also added a prefix to the config
test binary indicating which locale is being tested.
I originally found this issue when implementing a new executor that simply
collects test binaries in a given directory and was surprised to see many
additional executables other than the expected test binaries. I therefore
added the locale prefix to the test binaries and noticed that they were all
checking for cs_CZ.ISO8859-2.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84040
It is used for printing section headers in the GNU style
and the implementation can be simplified.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84330
Summary:
Use the built-in functionality BugType::SuppressOnSink
instead of a manual solution in StreamChecker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83120
Test case `test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll`
was failing due to malformed DwarfExpression.
This failure has been seen in lot of bots, for instance in:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/builds/18794
: 'RUN: at line 1'
/home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/llc
/home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/build/bin/FileCheck /home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll
home/buildbot/as-builder-4/lld-x86_64-ubuntu-fast/llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/WebAssembly/stackified-debug.ll:26:10: error: CHECK: expected string not found in input
CHECK: .int16 4 # Loc expr size
^
<stdin>:34:2: note: scanning from here
.int16 3 # Loc expr size
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
Loop bound inference is right now very limited as it supports only permutation maps and thus
it is impossible to implement convolution with linalg.generic as it requires more advanced
loop bound inference. This commits solves it for the convolution case.
Depends On D83158
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83191
This patch was reverted in 9d2da6759b due to assertion failure seen
in `test/DebugInfo/Sparc/subreg.ll`. Assertion failure was happening
due to malformed/unhandeled DwarfExpression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560
Summary:
If there was a single target to begin with, because a single target
can only occupy a single chunk, we couldn't increase granularity.
and would immediately give up.
Likewise, if we had multiple targets, if by the end we'd end up with
a single target, we wouldn't finish reducing it, it would always
end up being "interesting"
Reviewers: dblaikie, nickdesaulniers, diegotf
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84318
This reapplies commit d4020ef7c4, reverted in ac0edc5588 because it
broke build of LLDB. This commit contains appropriate changes for LLDB.
The original commit message is below.
Documentation on CreateProcessW states that maximal size of command line
is 32767 characters including ternimation null character. In the
function llvm::sys::commandLineFitsWithinSystemLimits this limit was set
to 32768. As a result if command line was exactly 32768 characters long,
a response file was not created and CreateProcessW was called with
too long command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83772
The revert was a misfire.
Remove the temporary flag PGSOIRPassOrTestOnly and the guard code which was used
for the staged rollout. This is a cleanup (NFC) as it's now false by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84057
Summary:
In the function `target`, memory deallocation and `target_data_end` is called
immediately returning from launching kernel. This might cause a race condition
that the corresponding memory is still being used by the kernel and a potential
issue that when the kernel starts to execute, its required data have already
been deallocated, especially when multiple kernels running concurrently. Since
nevertheless, we will block the thread issuing the target offloading at the end
of the target, we just move the synchronization ahead a little bit to make sure
the correctness.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, guansong, sstefan1, openmp-commits
Tags: #openmp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84381
This patch refactors the range list table to hold both the range list
table and the location list table.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84239
Summary:
llvm is missing support for DW_OP_implicit_value operation.
DW_OP_implicit_value op is indispensable for cases such as
optimized out long double variables.
For intro refer: DWARFv5 Spec Pg: 40 2.6.1.1.4 Implicit Location Descriptions
Consider the following example:
```
int main() {
long double ld = 3.14;
printf("dummy\n");
ld *= ld;
return 0;
}
```
when compiled with tunk `clang` as
`clang test.c -g -O1` produces following location description
of variable `ld`:
```
DW_AT_location (0x00000000:
[0x0000000000201691, 0x000000000020169b): DW_OP_constu 0xc8f5c28f5c28f800, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_piece 0x8, DW_OP_constu 0x4000, DW_OP_stack_value, DW_OP_bit_piece 0x10 0x40, DW_OP_stack_value)
DW_AT_name ("ld")
```
Here one may notice that this representation is incorrect(DWARF4
stack could only hold integers(and only up to the size of address)).
Here the variable size itself is `128` bit.
GDB and LLDB confirms this:
```
(gdb) p ld
$1 = <invalid float value>
(lldb) frame variable ld
(long double) ld = <extracting data from value failed>
```
GCC represents/uses DW_OP_implicit_value in these sort of situations.
Based on the discussion with Jakub Jelinek regarding GCC's motivation
for using this, I concluded that DW_OP_implicit_value is most appropriate
in this case.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2020-July/233057.html
GDB seems happy after this patch:(LLDB doesn't have support
for DW_OP_implicit_value)
```
(gdb) p ld
p ld
$1 = 3.14000000000000012434
```
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83560