Recommits 212776 which was reverted in r212793. This has been committed
and recommitted a few times as I try to test it harder and find/fix more
issues. The most recent revert was due to an asan bot failure which I
can't seem to reproduce locally, though I believe I'm following all the
steps the buildbot does.
So I'm going to recommit this in the hopes of investigating the failure
on the buildbot itself... apologies in advance for the bot noise. If
anyone sees failures with this /please/ provide me with any
reproductions, etc.
llvm-svn: 213391
This reverts commit r212776.
Nope, still seems to be failing on the sanitizer bots... but hey, not
the msan self-host anymore, it's failing in asan now. I'll start looking
there next.
llvm-svn: 212793
Committed in r212205 and reverted in r212226 due to msan self-hosting
failure, I believe I've got that fixed by r212761 to Clang.
Original commit message:
"Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined
instructions."
llvm-svn: 212776
This reverts commit r212205.
Reverting this again, still seeing crashes when building compiler-rt...
Sorry for the continued noise, not sure why I'm failing to reproduce
this locally.
llvm-svn: 212226
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212205
This reverts commit r212085.
This breaks the sanitizer bot... & I thought I'd tried pretty hard not
to do that. Guess I need to try harder.
llvm-svn: 212089
Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
and I now believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 212085
Reverting this again, didn't mean to commit it - while r211872 fixes one
of the issues here, there are still others to figure out and address.
This reverts commit r211871.
llvm-svn: 211873
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined instructions.
llvm-svn: 211723
Seems my previous fix was insufficient - we were still not adding the
inlined function to the abstract scope list. Which meant it wasn't
flagged as inline, didn't have nested lexical scopes in the abstract
definition, and didn't have abstract variables - so the inlined variable
didn't reference an abstract variable, instead being described
completely inline.
llvm-svn: 209602
This was reverted in r208642 due to regressions surrounding file changes
within lexical scopes causing inlining information to be lost.
The issue was in LexicalScopes::getOrCreateInlinedScope, where I was
previously testing "isLexicalBlock" which is false for
"DILexicalBlockFile" (a scope used to represent changes in the current
file name) and assuming it was then a function (breaking out of the
inlined scope path and reaching for the parent non-inlined scopes). By
inverting the condition and testing for "isSubprogram" the correct
behavior is attained.
(also found some weirdness in Clang, see r208742 when reducing this test
case - the resulting test case doesn't apply with the Clang fix, but
I've added a more realistic test case to inline-scopes.ll which does
reproduce the issue and demonstrate the fix)
llvm-svn: 208748
(r207876 was reverted in r208131 after seeing some consistent buildbot
failure for MSVC 2012. The original commits were in r207724-r207726)
Takumi was nice enough to dig into this and locate this Microsoft
Connect issue:
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/814899/forward-as-tuple-debug-implementation-error
describing a bug in MSVC2012's forward_as_tuple implementation.
Since the parameters in this instance are trivial/small, pass them by
value (using make_tuple) instead of perfectly-forwarded tuple of rvalue
references (involving the broken forward_as_tuple). Hopefully this will
satisfy MSVC2012.
llvm-svn: 208364
Speculatively reverting due to a suspicious failure on a Windows
buildbot.
This reverts commit 10c37a012ea11596d44cd9059fe09c959caf30c8.
llvm-svn: 208131
Committed initially in r207724-r207726 and reverted due to compiler-rt
crashes in r207732.
Instead, fix this harder with unordered_map and store the LexicalScopes
by value in the map. This did necessitate moving the definition of
LexicalScope above the definition of LexicalScopes.
Let's see how the buildbots/compilers tolerate unordered_map::emplace +
std::piecewise_construct + std::forward_as_tuple...
llvm-svn: 207876
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
include/llvm/Analysis/DebugInfo.h to include/llvm/DebugInfo.h.
The reasoning is because the DebugInfo module is simply an interface to the
debug info MDNodes and has nothing to do with analysis.
llvm-svn: 159312
file. Since it should only be used when necessary propagate it through
the backend code generation and tweak testcases accordingly.
This helps with code like in clang's test/CodeGen/debug-info-line.c where
we have multiple #line directives within a single lexical block and want
to generate only a single block that contains each file change.
Part of rdar://10246360
llvm-svn: 141729
Eric Christopher