This is a GNU attribute that allows split stacks to be turned off on a
per-function basis.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3817
llvm-svn: 209167
The conventional form is '<action> to silence this warning'.
Also call the diagnostic an 'issue' rather than a 'message' because the latter
term is more widely used with reference to message expressions.
llvm-svn: 209052
caused us to perform copy-initialization for the parameters of an allocation
function called by a new-expression multiple times, resulting in us rejecting
allocations that passed non-copyable parameters (and much worse things in
MSVC compat mode, where we potentially called this function multiple times).
llvm-svn: 208724
The base class is the culprit/risk here - a sealed/final derived class
with virtual functions and a non-virtual dtor can't accidentally be
polymorphically destroyed (if the base class's dtor is protected - which
also suppresses this warning).
llvm-svn: 208449
This lets us diagnose and perform more complete semantic analysis when faced
with errors in the function body or declaration.
By recovering here we provide more consistent diagnostics, particularly during
interactive editing.
llvm-svn: 208394
A template declaration of a template name can be null in case we have a dependent name or a set of function templates.
Hence use dyn_cast_or_null instead of dyn_cast. Also improve the diagnostic emitted in this case.
llvm-svn: 208313
C++. This seems like a pointless (and indeed harmful) restriction to me, so
I've suggested removing it to -core and disabled this diagnostic by default.
llvm-svn: 208254
Libraries specify enabled/disabled features using macro defs of 0/1, in such cases the -Wconstant-logical-operand
is noise.
rdar://15410291
llvm-svn: 207386
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
-Wc++11-compat-deprecated-writable-strings. It's neither a C++11 compatibility
warning nor a deprecated feature, it's just ill-formed.
In passing, add that warning to -Wdeprecated, where it belongs.
llvm-svn: 206833
Warn on std::abs() with unsigned argument.
Suggest std::abs as replacement for the C absolute value functions.
Suggest C++ headers if the specific std::abs overload is not found.
llvm-svn: 206340
Parse of nested name spacifier is modified so that it properly recovers
if colon is mistyped as double colon in case statement.
This patch fixes PR15133.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2870
llvm-svn: 206135
If the C-style type cast is applied to the overloaded
function and the destination type is function type,
then Clang will crash with assertion failure. For example,
void foo(int);
void foo(int, int);
void bar() {
typedef void (ft)(int);
ft p = (ft)foo;
}
In this case, the overloaded function foo will be cast to
a function type, which should be considered as an error.
But, unfortunately, since the function resolution is using
canonical type, the matched function will be returned, and
result in SEGV.
This patch fixes this issue by removing the assertion and
add some error diagnostics as the one in static_cast.
llvm-svn: 206133
declaration is not visible. Previously we didn't find hidden friend names in
this redeclaration lookup, because we forgot to treat it as a redeclaration
lookup. Conversely, we did find some local extern names, but those don't
actually conflict with a namespace-scope using declaration, because the only
conflicts we can get are scope conflicts, not conflicts due to the entities
being members of the same namespace.
llvm-svn: 206011
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
obviously won't work. Specifically, don't suggest methods (static or
not) from unrelated classes when the expression is a method call
through a specific object.
llvm-svn: 205653
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
meaningful to odr-use the VarDecl inside a variable template. (Separately, it'd
be nice to track referenced-ness for templates, and warn on unused ones, but
that's really a distinct issue...)
Move a test that generates and tests a warning-suppressing error out to its own
test file, so it doesn't have weird effects on the other tests in the same file.
llvm-svn: 205448
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
While investigating some debug info issues, Eric and I came across a
particular template case where the location of a decl was quite
different from the range of the same decl. It might've been rather
helpful if the dumper had actually showed us this.
llvm-svn: 205396
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
The exception is return statements that include control-flow,
which are clearly doing something "interesting".
99% of the cases I examined for -Wunreachable-code that fired
on return statements were not interesting enough to warrant
being in -Wunreachable-code by default. Thus the move to
include them in -Wunreachable-code-return.
This simplifies a bunch of logic, including removing the ad hoc
logic to look for std::string literals.
llvm-svn: 204307
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
This can possibly be refined later, but right now the experience
is so incomprehensible for a user to understand what is going on
this isn't a useful warning.
llvm-svn: 203336
This patch fixes PR18964. In linkage computation, assertion fails when
an old invalid declaration's linkage mismatches with the current
decl's one.
llvm-svn: 203168
I have mixed feelings about this one. It's used all over the codebase,
and is analogous to the current heuristic for ordinary C string literals.
This requires some ad hoc pattern matching of the AST. While the
test case mirrors what we see std::string in libc++, it's not really
testing the libc++ headers.
llvm-svn: 203091
Sometimes do..while() is used to create a scope that can be left early.
In such cases, the unreachable 'while()' test is not usually interesting
unless it actually does something that is observable.
llvm-svn: 203051
Summary:
This is needed to allow MSVC's <atomic> header to properly parse.
It uses _Atomic as a class-id.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2948
llvm-svn: 202901
const char *format = "%s";
std::experimental::string_view view = "foo";
printf(format, view);
In this case, not only warn about a class type being used here, but also suggest that calling c_str() might be a good idea.
llvm-svn: 202461
or virtual functions, but permit that error to be downgraded to
a warning (with -Wno-error=incompatible-ms-struct), and officially
support this kind of dual, ABI-mixing layout.
The basic problem here is that projects which use ms_struct are often
not very circumspect about what types they annotate; for example,
some projects enable the pragma in a prefix header and then only
selectively disable it around system header inclusions. They may
only care about binary compatibility with MSVC for a subset of
those structs, but that doesn't mean they have no binary
compatibility concerns at all for the rest; thus we are essentially
forced into supporting this hybrid ABI. But it's reasonable for
us to at least point out the places where we're not making
any guarantees.
The original diagnostic was for dynamic classes, i.e. those with
virtual functions or virtual bases; I've extended it to include
all classes with bases, because we are not actually making any
attempt to duplicate MSVC's base subobject layout in ms_struct
(and it is indeed quite different from Itanium, even for
non-virtual bases).
rdar://16178895
llvm-svn: 202427
null comparison when the pointer is known to be non-null.
This catches the array to pointer decay, function to pointer decay and
address of variables. This does not catch address of function since this
has been previously used to silence a warning.
Pointer to bool conversion is under -Wbool-conversion.
Pointer to null comparison is under -Wtautological-pointer-compare, a sub-group
of -Wtautological-compare.
void foo() {
int arr[5];
int x;
// warn on these conditionals
if (foo);
if (arr);
if (&x);
if (foo == null);
if (arr == null);
if (&x == null);
if (&foo); // no warning
}
llvm-svn: 202216
The warnings fall into three groups.
1) Using an absolute value function of the wrong type, for instance, using the
int absolute value function when the argument is a floating point type.
2) Using the improper sized absolute value function, for instance, using abs
when the argument is a long long. llabs should be used instead.
From these two cases, an implicit conversion will occur which may cause
unexpected behavior. Where possible, suggest the proper absolute value
function to use, and which header to include if the function is not available.
3) Taking the absolute value of an unsigned value. In addition to this warning,
suggest to remove the function call. This usually indicates a logic error
since the programmer assumed negative values would have been possible.
llvm-svn: 202211
- Don't emit anything when we encounter a call to a conversion operator.
"bar(a & b)" instead of "bar(a & b.operator int())"
This preserves the semantics and is still idempotent if we print the AST multiple times.
- Properly print declarations of conversion operators.
"explicit operator bool();" instead of "bool operator _Bool();"
PR18776.
llvm-svn: 202167
We were previously checking at every destructor declaration, but that was a bit
excessive. Since the deleting destructor is emitted with the vtable, do the
check when the vtable is marked used.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2851
llvm-svn: 202046
DR18 previously forebode typedefs to be used as parameter types if they
were of type 'void'. DR577 allows 'void' to be used as a function
parameter type regardless from where it came.
llvm-svn: 201631
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
temporary in a decltype expression only applies if that temporary was created
by a function call, not by a function-style cast or other flavour of
expression.
llvm-svn: 201542
For some reason we have two bits of code handling this printing:
lib/AST/Decl.cpp: OS << "<anonymous namespace>";
lib/AST/TypePrinter.cpp: OS << "<anonymous namespace>::";
it would be nice if we only had one...
llvm-svn: 201437
and the class name is shadowed by another member. Recovery still needs
to be figured out, which is non-trivial since the parser has already gone
down a much different path than if it had recognized the class template
as type instead of seeing the member that shadowed the class template.
llvm-svn: 201360
These features are new in VS 2013 and are necessary in order to layout
std::ostream correctly. Currently we have an ABI incompatibility when
self-hosting with the 2013 stdlib in our convertible_fwd_ostream wrapper
in gtest.
This change adds another implicit attribute, MSVtorDispAttr, because
implicit attributes are currently the best way to make sure the
information stays on class templates through instantiation.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2746
llvm-svn: 201274
These flags control the inheritance model initially used by the
translation unit.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2741
llvm-svn: 201175
Introduce a notion of a 'current representation method' for
pointers-to-members.
When starting out, this is set to 'best case' (representation method is
chosen by examining the class, selecting the smallest representation
that would work given the class definition or lack thereof).
This pragma allows the translation unit to dictate exactly what
representation to use, similar to how the inheritance model keywords
operate.
N.B. PCH support is forthcoming.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2723
llvm-svn: 201105
Rather than simply saying "X is not a class or namespace", clarify what
X is by providing the aka type in the case where X is a type, or
pointing to the named declaration if there's an unambiguous one to refer
to. In the ambiguous case, the ambiguities are already enumerated
(though could be clarified by describing what kind of entities they are)
Included a few FIXMEs in tests where some further improvements could be
made.
llvm-svn: 201038
unique them and permits the implementation of dynamic_cast (and
anything else which knows it's working with a complete class
type) to compare their addresses directly.
rdar://16005328
llvm-svn: 201020
Summary:
This avoids false positives from -Wmicrosoft when name lookup would
normally succeed in standard C++. This triggered on a common CRTP
pattern in clang, where a derived class would have a private using decl
to pull in members of a dependent base:
class Verifier : InstVisitor<Verifier> {
private:
using InstVisitor<Verifier>::visit;
...
void anything() {
visit(); // warned here
}
};
Real access checks pass here because we're in the context of the
Verifier, but the -Wmicrosoft extension was just looking for the private
access specifier.
Reviewers: rsmith
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2679
llvm-svn: 201019
'operator delete' or 'operator delete[]' is an explicit exception
specification. Therefore we should diagnose 'void operator delete(void*)'
instead of 'void operator delete(void*) noexcept'.
This diagnostic remains an ExtWarn, since in practice people don't always
include the exception specification in such a declaration.
llvm-svn: 201002
If we are in the middle of defining the class, don't attempt to
validate previously annotated declarations. We may not have seen base
specifiers or virtual method declarations yet.
llvm-svn: 200959
type-dependent variable, even if the initializer isn't value-dependent. This
happens for ParenListExprs composed of non-value-dependent subexpressions, for
instance.
We should really give ParenListExprs (and InitListExprs) the type of the
initialized entity if they're used to represent a dependent initialization (and
if so, set them to be type-, value- and instantiation-dependent).
llvm-svn: 200954
In the following code:
struct A { static const int sz; };
template<class T> void f() { T arr[A::sz]; }
the array 'arr' is represented as a variable size array in the template.
If 'A::sz' gets value below in the translation unit, the array in
instantiation can turn into constant size array.
This change fixes PR18633.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2688
llvm-svn: 200899
Because in C++, "anonymous" doesn't mean "nameless" for records. In
other words, RecordDecl::isAnonymousStructOrUnion only returns true if
the record lacks a name *and* is not used as the type in an object's
declaration.
llvm-svn: 200868
When a lax conversion featured a vector and a non-vector, we were
only requiring the non-vector to be a scalar type, but really it
needs to be a real type (i.e. integral or real floating); it is
not reasonable to allow a pointer, member pointer, or complex
type here.
r198474 required lax conversions to match in "data size", i.e.
element size * element count, forbidding matches that happen
only because a vector is rounded up to the nearest power of two
in size. Unfortunately, the erroneous logic was repeated in
several different places; unify them to use the new condition,
so that it triggers for arbitrary conversions and not just
those performed as part of binary operator checking.
rdar://15931426
llvm-svn: 200810
redeclaration, not just when looking them up for a use -- we need the implicit
declaration to appropriately check various properties of them (notably, whether
they're deleted).
llvm-svn: 200729
With this change, we give different results for __alignof than MSVC, but
our record layout is compatible.
Some data member pointers also now have a size that is not a multiple of
their alignment.
Fixes PR18618.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2669
llvm-svn: 200585
a previously-computed linkage as an unsupportable error condition.
Per discussion on cfe-commits, this appears to be a
difficult-to-resolve flaw in our implementation approach;
we may pursue this as a language defect, but for now it's
better to diagnose it as unsupported than to produce
inconsistent results (or assertions). Anything that we can
do to limit how often this diagnostic fires, such as the
changes in r200380, is probably for the best, though.
llvm-svn: 200438
We would previously allow inappropriate inheritance keywords to appear
on class declarations. We would also allow inheritance keywords on
templates which were not fully specialized; this was divergent from
MSVC.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2585
llvm-svn: 200423
the linkage cache) when type-checking static local
variables.
There's a very deep problem here where the linkage of
a declaration can suddenly massively change as soon as
it's given a typedef name; these fixes, while optimizations
in their own right, are really just targeted workarounds.
rdar://15928125
llvm-svn: 200380
initialized from a constant expression in C++98, it can be used in
constant expressions, even if it was brace-initialized. Patch by
Rahul Jain!
llvm-svn: 200098
Previously, string literals were ignored in all logical expressions. This
reduces it to only ignore in logical and expressions.
assert(0 && "error"); // No warning
assert(0 || "error"); // Warn
Fixes PR17565
llvm-svn: 200056
override for the type of 'this', also clear it out (unless we're entering the
context of a lambda-expression, where it should be inherited).
llvm-svn: 199962
language options. This is not really ideal -- we should require the right
language options to be passed in, or not require language options to format a
name -- but it fixes a number of *obviously* wrong formattings. Patch by
Olivier Goffart!
llvm-svn: 199778
Checking in ActOnVariableDeclarator computes and caches the linkage using
the non-deduced auto type which defaults to external linkage. Depending on
how the auto type is deduced linkage can change and conflict with the
cached linkage, hitting asserts.
llvm-svn: 199774
Implement type trait primitives used in the latest edition of the Microsoft
standard C++ library type_traits header.
With this change we can parse much of the Visual Studio 2013 standard headers,
particularly anything that includes <type_traits>.
Fully implemented, available in all language modes:
* __is_constructible()
* __is_nothrow_constructible()
* __is_nothrow_assignable()
Partially implemented, semantic analysis WIP, available as MS extensions:
* __is_destructible()
* __is_nothrow_destructible()
llvm-svn: 199619
Check all default ctors, not just the first one we see. This brings
__has_nothrow_constructor() in line with the other unary type traits.
A C++ class can have multiple default constructors but clang was only checking
the first one written, presumably due to ambiguity in the GNU specification.
MSVC has the same bug, while g++ has the correct implementation which we now
match.
llvm-svn: 199618
String literal to char* conversion is deprecated in C++03, and is removed in
C++11. We still accept this conversion in C++11 mode as an extension, if we find
it in the best viable function.
llvm-svn: 199513
handling C++11 default initializers. Without this, other parts of Sema (such as
lambda capture) would think the default initializer is part of the surrounding
function scope.
llvm-svn: 199453
pointer, since this invokes undefined behavior. Based on a patch by Artyom
Skrobov! Handling of dependent exception specifications and some additional
testcases by me.
llvm-svn: 199452
attribute syntax. There's nothing generalized about this; it's one of
several first-class attribute syntaxes we support, all of which are
more-or-less equally general.
As discussed on cfe-commits, we may want to revisit this if we start allowing
this syntax as an extension in C (or if C adopts the syntax), but hopefully
this diagnostic wording will be crystal clear to everyone in the mean time.
llvm-svn: 199443
The MSVC ABI is rather finicky about the exact representation of it's
pointer-to-member representation. The exact position of when and where
it will go with one representation versus another appears to be when it
desires the pointer-to-member to be complete.
To properly implement this in clang, do several things:
- Give up on tracking the polymorphic nature of the class. It isn't
useful to Sema and is only pertinent when choosing CodeGen-time
details like whether the field-offset can be 0 instead of -1.
- Insist on locking-in the inheritance model when we ask our
pointer-to-member type to be complete. From there, grab the
underlying CXXRecordDecl and try to make *that* complete. Once we've
done this, we can calculate it's inheritance model and apply it using
an attribute.
N.B. My first bullet point is a lie. We will eventually care about the
specifics of whether or not a CXXRecordDecl is or is not polymorphic
because MSVC compatible mangling of such things depends on it. However,
I believe we will handle this in a rather different way.
llvm-svn: 199416
We would attempt to determine the inheritance relationship between
classes 'A' and 'B' during static_cast if we tried to convert from 'int
A::*' to 'int B::*'. However, the question "does A derive from B" is
not meaningful when 'A' isn't defined.
Handle this case by requiring that 'A' be defined.
This fixes PR18506.
llvm-svn: 199374
Changes made in r192200 fixed PR16992, which requested fixit suggesting
parenthesis if sizeof is followed by type-id. However expression in form
T() followed by ')' was incorrectly considered as a type-id if 'T' is
typedef name. This change fixes this case.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2440
llvm-svn: 199284
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
MSVC defines size_t without any explicit declarations. This change
allows us to be compatible with TUs that depend on this declaration
appearing from nowhere.
llvm-svn: 199190
consumable objects. These are useful for implementing error codes that
must be checked. Patch also includes some significant refactoring, which was
necesary to implement the new behavior.
llvm-svn: 199169
In preparation for making the Win32 triple imply MS ABI mode,
make all tests pass in this mode, or make them use the Itanium
mode explicitly.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2401
llvm-svn: 199130
The ABI requires the destructor to be invoked in the callee, but the
standard does not require access checks here so we avoid doing direct
access checks on the destructor.
If we end up needing to define an implicit destructor, we don't skip
access checks for the base class, etc. Those checks are effectively part
of generating the destructor definition, and aren't affected by which TU
the check is performed in.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2409
llvm-svn: 199120
Various attribute flavours are supported in C++98. Make it clear that this
compatibility warning relates specifically to C++11-style generalized
attributes.
llvm-svn: 199053
rules: instead of requiring flexible array members to be POD, require them to
be trivially-destructible. This seems to be the only constraint that actually
matters here (and even then, it's questionable whether this matters).
llvm-svn: 198983
issue 1430. Don't allow a pack expansion to be used as an argument to an alias
template unless the corresponding parameter is a parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 198833
type-specifier in C++. Some checks will assert in this case otherwise (in
particular, the access specifier may be missing if this happens inside a class
definition, due to a violation of an AST invariant).
llvm-svn: 198721
In all three checks, the note indicates a previous declaration and never a 'use'.
Before:
enum-scoped.cpp:92:6: note: previous use is here
enum Redeclare6 : int;
^
After:
enum-scoped.cpp:92:6: note: previous declaration is here
enum Redeclare6 : int;
^
llvm-svn: 198600
It was previously enabled in both but should only have been part of the drop-in
quirks mode that is 'MicrosoftMode' given that it's only useful for
compatibility with the Microsoft headers/runtime.
llvm-svn: 198548
Thisadds a new warning that warns on code like this:
if (memcmp(a, b, sizeof(a) != 0))
The warning looks like:
test4.cc:5:30: warning: size argument in 'memcmp' call is a comparison [-Wmemsize-comparison]
if (memcmp(a, b, sizeof(a) != 0))
~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
test4.cc:5:7: note: did you mean to compare the result of 'memcmp' instead?
if (memcmp(a, b, sizeof(a) != 0))
^ ~
)
test4.cc:5:20: note: explicitly cast the argument to size_t to silence this warning
if (memcmp(a, b, sizeof(a) != 0))
^
(size_t)( )
1 warning generated.
This found 2 bugs in chromium and has 0 false positives on both chromium and
llvm.
The idea of triggering this warning on a binop in the size argument is due to
rnk.
llvm-svn: 198063
Even g++ considers this a valid C++ identifier and it should only have been
visible in C mode.
Also drop the associated low-value diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 197995
This new warning detects when a function will recursively call itself on every
code path though that function. This catches simple recursive cases such as:
void foo() {
foo();
}
As well as more complex functions like:
void bar() {
if (test()) {
bar();
return;
} else {
bar();
}
return;
}
This warning uses the CFG. As with other CFG-based warnings, this is off
by default. Due to false positives, this warning is also disabled for
templated functions.
llvm-svn: 197853
Without this patch, record decls with invalid out-of-line method delcs would
sometimes be marked invalid, but not always. With this patch, they are
consistently never marked invalid.
(The code to do this was added in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20100809/033154.html
, but the test from that revision is still passing.)
As far as I can tell, this was the only place where a class was marked invalid
after its definition was complete.
llvm-svn: 197848
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
We would previously emit redundant diagnostics for the following code:
struct S {
virtual ~S() = delete;
void operator delete(void*, int);
void operator delete(void*, double);
} s;
First we would check on ~S() and error about the ambigous delete functions,
and then we would error about using the deleted destructor.
If the destructor is deleted, there's no need to check it.
Also, move the check from Sema::ActOnFields to CheckCompleteCXXClass. These
are run at almost the same time, called from ActOnFinishCXXMemberSpecification.
However, CHeckCompleteCXXClass may mark a defaulted destructor as deleted, and
if that's the case we don't want to check it.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2421
llvm-svn: 197509
to determine if a move function is the std::move function. This allows functions
like std::__1::move to also be treated a the move function.
llvm-svn: 197445
CXXScopeSpec when necessary while performing typo correction. This fixes
the crash reported in PR18213 (the problem existed since r185487, and
r193020 made it easier to hit).
llvm-svn: 197409
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
The tests were perhaps made too relaxed in r197164 when we switched to the new
MinGW ABI. This makes sure we check explicitly for an optional thiscall
attribute and nothing else.
We should still look into whether we should print these attributes at all in
these cases.
llvm-svn: 197252
declarations that might lifetime-extend multiple temporaries. In passing, fix a
crasher (PR18217) if an initializer was dependent and exactly the wrong shape,
and remove a bogus function (Expr::findMaterializedTemporary) now its last use
is gone.
llvm-svn: 197103
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
Methods are thiscall by default in the MS ABI, and also in MinGW targetting GCC 4.7 or later.
This changes the diagnostic from the technically correct but hard to understand:
virtual function 'foo' has different calling convention attributes ('void ()') than the function it overrides (which has calling convention 'void () __attribute__((thiscall))')
to the more intuitive and also correct:
'static' member function 'foo' overrides a virtual function
We already have a test for this. Let's just run it in both ABI modes.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2375
llvm-svn: 197055
Add back the test that was triggering the assertion (which I removed mistakenly thinking it was triggering just a warning and not an assertion). My error was brought to my attention by Rafael (Thanks!).
llvm-svn: 196721
within their namespace, and such a redeclaration isn't required to be a
definition any more.
Update DR status page to say Clang 3.4 instead of SVN and add new Clang 3.5
category (but keep Clang 3.4 yellow for now).
llvm-svn: 196481
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
Summary:
In general, this type node can be used to represent any type adjustment
that occurs implicitly without losing type sugar. The immediate use of
this is to adjust the calling conventions of member function pointer
types without breaking template instantiation.
Fixes PR17996.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2332
llvm-svn: 196451
nested-name-specifier, rather than crashing. (In fact, reject all
literal-operator-ids that have a non-namespace nested-name-specifier). The
grammar doesn't allow these in some cases, and in other cases does allow them
but instantiation will always fail.
llvm-svn: 196443
Clang currently croaks on the following:
struct X1 {
struct X2 {
int L = ([] (int i) { return i; })(2);
};
};
asserting that the containing lexical context of the lambda is not Sema's cur context, when pushing the lambda's decl context on.
This occurs because (prior to this patch) getContainingDC always returns the non-nested class for functions at class scope (even for inline member functions of nested classes (to account for delayed parsing of their bodies)). The patch addresses this by having getContainingDC always return the lexical DC for a lambda's call operator.
Link to the bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18052
Link to Richard Smith's feedback on phabricator: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2331
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 196423
The warning from cmake-clang-x64-msc16-R was:
test\SemaCXX\old-style-cast.cpp Line 6: cast to 'void **' from smaller integer type 'long'
llvm-svn: 195813
MSVC applies these to the following declaration only if present, otherwise
silently ignores them whereas we'll issue a warning.
Handling differs from ordinary attributes appearing in the same place, so add a
Sema test to make sure we get it right.
llvm-svn: 195577
data member definitions when the variable has an initializer
in its declaration.
For the following code:
struct S {
static const int x = 42;
};
const int S::x = 42;
This patch changes the diagnostic from:
a.cc:4:14: error: redefinition of 'x'
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:20: note: previous definition is here
static const int x = 42;
^
to:
a.cc:4:18: error: static data member 'x' already has an initializer
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:24: note: previous initialization is here
static const int x = 42;
^
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2235
llvm-svn: 195306
The previous patches tried to deduce the correct function type. I now realize
this is not possible in general. Consider
class foo {
template <typename T> static void bar(T v);
};
extern template void foo::bar(const void *);
We will only know that bar is static after a lookup, so we have to handle this
in the template instantiation code.
This patch reverts my previous two changes (but not the tests) and instead
handles the issue in DeduceTemplateArguments.
llvm-svn: 195154
logic was not handling typedefs as free functions. This was not
causing problems with the existing tests, but does with the microsoft
abi where they have to get a different calling convention.
I will try to refactor this into a method on Declarator in a second.
llvm-svn: 195050
Before this patch explicit template instatiations of member function templates
were failing with the microsoft abi and 32 bits. This was happening because
the expected and computed function types had different calling conventions.
This patch fixes it by considering the default calling convention in
GetFullTypeForDeclarator.
This fixes pr17973.
llvm-svn: 195032
Earlier versions discarded the state too soon, and did not track state changes,
e.g. when passing a temporary to a move constructor. Patch by
chris.wailes@gmail.com; review and minor fixes by delesley.
llvm-svn: 194900
the GNU documentation: the attribute only appertains to the label if it is
followed by a semicolon. Based on a patch by Aaron Ballman!
llvm-svn: 194869
By adding a default config.excludes pattern we can avoid individual
suppressions in subdirectories.
This matches LLVM's lit.cfg which also excludes a few other common non-test
filenames for consistency.
llvm-svn: 194814
where we didn't. Extend our constant evaluation for __builtin_strlen to handle
any constant array of chars, not just string literals, to match.
llvm-svn: 194762
bit fields of zero size. Warnings are generated in C++ mode and if
only such type is defined inside extern "C" block.
The patch fixed PR5065.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2151
llvm-svn: 194653
We already have builtins that are only available in GNU mode, so this
mirrors that.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2128
llvm-svn: 194615
This patch fixes PR8264. Duplicate qualifiers already are diagnozed,
now the same diagnostics is issued for duplicate function specifiers.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2025
llvm-svn: 194559
See http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-November/033369.html for discussion on cfe-dev.
This fix explicitly checks whether we are within the declcontext of a lambda's call operator - which is what I had intended to be true (and assumed would be true if getCurLambda returns a valid pointer) before checking whether a lambda can capture the potential-captures of the innermost lambda.
A deeper fix (that addresses why getCurLambda() returns a valid pointer when perhaps it shouldn't?) - as proposed by Richard Smith in http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17877 - has been suggested as a FIXME.
Patch was LGTM'd by Richard (just barely :)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2144
llvm-svn: 194448
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
bit more robust against future changes. This includes a slight diagnostic
improvement: if we know we're only trying to form a constant expression, take
the first diagnostic which shows the expression is not a constant expression,
rather than preferring the first one which makes the expression unfoldable.
llvm-svn: 194098
Similar C code isn't caught as it seems to hit a different code path.
Also, as the check is only done for record pointers, cases involving
an overloaded operator-> are not handled either. Note that the reason
this check is done in the parser instead of Sema is not related to
having enough knowledge about the current state as it is about being
able to fix up the parser's state to be able to recover and traverse the
correct code paths.
llvm-svn: 194002
If the sole distinction between two declarations is that one has a
__restrict qualifier then we should not consider it to be an overload.
Instead, we will consider it as an incompatible redeclaration which is
similar to how MSVC, ICC and GCC would handle it.
This fixes PR17786.
N.B. We must not mangle in __restrict into method qualifiers becase we
don't allow overloading between such declarations anymore. To do
otherwise would be a violation of the Itanium ABI.
llvm-svn: 193964
Flexible array members only work out if they are the last field of a
record, however virtual bases would give us many situations where the
flexible array member would overlap with the virtual base fields.
It is unlikely in the extreme that this behavior was intended by the
user so raise a diagnostic instead of accepting. This is will not
reject conforming code because flexible array members are an extension
in C++ mode.
llvm-svn: 193920
The determination of which diagnostics would be issued for certain
anonymous unions started to get a little ridiculous. Clean this up by
inverting the condition-tree's logic from dialect -> issue to
issue -> diagnostic.
As part of this cleanup, move ext_c99_flexible_array_member from
DiagnosticParseKinds.td to DiagnosticSemaKinds.td because it's driven by
Sema, not Parse.
Also, the liberty was taken to edit ext_c99_flexible_array_member to
match other, similar, diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 193919
Specifically, this warns when a character literal is added (using '+') to a
variable with type 'char *' (or any other pointer to character type). Like
-Wstring-plus-int, there is a fix-it to change "foo + 'a'" to "&foo['a']"
iff the character literal is on the right side of the string.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm!
llvm-svn: 193418
Change the uninitialized field warnings so that field initializers are checked
inside the constructor. Previously, in class initializers were checked
separately. Running one set of checks also simplifies the logic for preventing
duplicate warnings. Added new checks to warn when an uninitialized field is
used in base class initialization. Also fixed misspelling of uninitialized
and moved all code for this warning together.
llvm-svn: 193386
This patch fixes the typelocs of the conversion-operator and the conversion-operator-name and adds the parameters of the call operator to the FunctionProtoTypeLoc of the respective entities. Thus, when the template declarations (conversion operators) undergo deduction and instantiation/transformation/substitution - they add themselves to the local instantiation scope if needed.
This patch supports the following:
auto L = [](auto b) {
return [](auto a) ->decltype(a) { return a; };
};
int (*fp)(int) = L(8);
Richard LGTM'd this patch: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1831
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193294
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
Another attempt caused a test to fail (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091533.html) and also had to be reverted - my apologies - in my haste, i did not run all the tests - argh!
Now all the tests seem to pass - but a Fixme has been added - since I suspect Richard will find the fix a little inelegant ;) I shall try and work on a more elegant fix once I have had a chance to discuss with Richard or Doug at a later date.
Hopefully the third time;s a charm *fingers crossed*
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193230
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
lambdas nested within templates and themselves.
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193216
With this extension, friend function declarations will retain the language
linkage specified for previous declarations instead of emitting an error
diagnostic.
The feature is known to be compatible with GCC and MSVC and permits a
language to be specified indirectly where it cannot otherwise be written
directly in class scope.
Work is ongoing to improve linkage spec diagnostics.
Fixes PR17337.
Reviewed by Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 193206
Richard Trieu