- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
Summary:
* Follows the convention of the tablegen-generated dialects.
* Ensures that vague linkage rules place the definitions in the dialect's object files.
* Allows code that uses RTTI to include MLIR headers (compiled without RTTI) without
type_info link errors.
Reviewers: rriddle
Reviewed By: rriddle
Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, frgossen, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78039
In cmake, it is redundant to have a target list under target_link_libraries()
and add_dependency(). This patch removes the redundant dependency from
add_dependency().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74929
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
In cmake, it is redundant to have a target list under target_link_libraries()
and add_dependency(). This patch removes the redundant dependency from
add_dependency().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74929
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
In cmake, it is redundant to have a target list under target_link_libraries()
and add_dependency(). This patch removes the redundant dependency from
add_dependency().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74929
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Instead of creating extra libraries we don't really need, collect a
list of all dialects and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75221
In the previous state, we were relying on forcing the linker to include
all libraries in the final binary and the global initializer to self-register
every piece of the system. This change help moving away from this model, and
allow users to compose pieces more freely. The current change is only "fixing"
the dialect registration and avoiding relying on "whole link" for the passes.
The translation is still relying on the global registry, and some refactoring
is needed to make this all more convenient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74461
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
* Fixes use of anonymous namespace for static methods.
* Uses explicit qualifiers(mlir::) instead of wrapping the definition with the namespace.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 286222654
Introduce support for applying the stripe operator to sum expressions, as in
(x + A) # B = x + A - (x + A) mod B.
This is required to represent a combination of tiling and padding in the SDBM
framework, and is a valid SDBM construct that was not originally supported.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 269758807
Extend SDBM simplification patterns to support more cases where the addition of
two expressions each involving one or two variables would result in a sum
expression that only contains one variable and thus remains in the SDBM domain.
This is made possible by the new canonical structure of SDBM where the constant
term appears once. This simplification will be necessary to support
round-tripping of stripe expressions containing constant terms on the LHS
through affine expressions.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 269757732
Swap the allowed nesting of sum and diff expressions: now a diff expression can
contain a sum expression, but only on the left hand side. A difference of two
expressions sum must be canonicalized by grouping their constant terms in a
single expression. This change of sturcture became possible thanks to the
introduction of the "direct" super-kind. It is necessary to enable support of
sum expressions on the left hand side of the stripe expression.
SDBM expressions are now grouped into the following structure
- expression
- varying
- direct
- sum <- (term, constant)
- term
- symbol
- dimension
- stripe <- (term, constant)
- negation <- (direct)
- difference <- (direct, term)
- constant
The notation <- (...) denotes the types of subexpressions a compound
expression can combine.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 269337222
This better reflects how this kind of expressions is used and avoids the
potential confusion since the expression can take negative values. Term
expressions comprise dimensions, symbols and stripe expressions. In an SDBM
domain, a stripe expression always corresponds to a variable, input or
temporary. This expression can appear anywhere an input variable can,
including on the LHS of other stripe expressions.
PiperOrigin-RevId: 268486066
River Riddle