Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Blaikie f55abeaf4c Revert "Revert "PR14606: debug info imported_module support""
This reverts commit r179840 with a fix to test/DebugInfo/two-cus-from-same-file.ll

I'm not sure why that test only failed on ARM & MIPS and not X86 Linux, even
though the debug info was clearly invalid on all of them, but this ought to fix
it.

llvm-svn: 179996
2013-04-22 06:12:31 +00:00
Eric Christopher 0e89ade8ff Revert "PR14606: debug info imported_module support"
This reverts commit r179836 as it seems to have caused test failures.

llvm-svn: 179840
2013-04-19 07:47:16 +00:00
David Blaikie 88564f3cf7 PR14606: debug info imported_module support
Adding another CU-wide list, in this case of imported_modules (since they
should be relatively rare, it seemed better to add a list where each element
had a "context" value, rather than add a (usually empty) list to every scope).
This takes care of DW_TAG_imported_module, but to fully address PR14606 we'll
need to expand this to cover DW_TAG_imported_declaration too.

llvm-svn: 179836
2013-04-19 06:57:04 +00:00
David Blaikie 5692e72f30 Revert "Adding DIImportedModules to DIScopes."
This reverts commit 342d92c7a0adeabc9ab00f3f0d88d739fe7da4c7.

Turns out we're going with a different schema design to represent
DW_TAG_imported_modules so we won't need this extra field.

llvm-svn: 178215
2013-03-28 02:44:59 +00:00
David Blaikie a26d70358f Adding DIImportedModules to DIScopes.
This is just the basic groundwork for supporting DW_TAG_imported_module but I
wanted to commit this before pushing support further into Clang or LLVM so that
this rather churny change is isolated from the rest of the work. The major
churn here is obviously adding another field (within the common DIScope prefix)
to all DIScopes (files, classes, namespaces, lexical scopes, etc). This should
be the last big churny change needed for DW_TAG_imported_module/using directive
support/PR14606.

llvm-svn: 178099
2013-03-27 00:07:26 +00:00
David Blaikie cc8d090163 Remove unused field in DISubprogram
llvm-svn: 177661
2013-03-21 20:28:52 +00:00
David Blaikie 43a729d165 Remove unused field in DICompileUnit
llvm-svn: 177590
2013-03-20 22:34:33 +00:00
David Blaikie 1ca2f36289 Refactor filename/directory in DICompileUnit into a DIFile
This is the next step towards making the metadata for DIScopes have a common
prefix rather than having to delegate based on their tag type.

llvm-svn: 176913
2013-03-13 00:01:35 +00:00
David Blaikie 452c3ff649 Remove unused "isMain" field from DICompileUnit
llvm-svn: 176910
2013-03-12 22:43:04 +00:00
David Blaikie a4f770d51c Update debug info test cases with empty SplitDebugFilename field.
This could be 'null' or the empty string, DIDescriptor::getStringField
coalesces the two cases anyway so it's just a matter of legible/efficient
representation.

The change in behavior of the DICompileUnit::get* functions could be
subsumed by the full verification check - but ideally that should just be an
assertion if we could front-load the actual debug info metadata failure paths.

llvm-svn: 176907
2013-03-12 22:25:36 +00:00
David Blaikie 47922fb006 Upgrading debug info test cases to be (more) compatible with the current debug info format.
These cases were found by further work to remove support for debug info
versioning. Common cleanups (other than changing the version info in the tag
field) included adding the last parameter to compile_units (recently added for
fission support) and other cases of trailing fields in lexical blocks, compile
units, and subprograms.

llvm-svn: 176834
2013-03-11 22:37:40 +00:00
David Blaikie 33111dfea0 Remove the (apparently) unnecessary debug info metadata indirection.
The main lists of debug info metadata attached to the compile_unit had an extra
layer of metadata nodes they went through for no apparent reason. This patch
removes that (& still passes just as much of the GDB 7.5 test suite). If anyone
can show evidence as to why these extra metadata nodes are there I'm open to
reverting this patch & documenting why they're there.

llvm-svn: 174266
2013-02-02 05:56:24 +00:00
Bill Wendling d7767125d5 Use the 'count' attribute to calculate the upper bound of an array.
The count attribute is more accurate with regards to the size of an array. It
also obviates the upper bound attribute in the subrange. We can also better
handle an unbound array by setting the count to -1 instead of the lower bound to
1 and upper bound to 0.

llvm-svn: 169312
2012-12-04 21:34:03 +00:00
Bill Wendling bfc0e5725f Add a 'count' field to the DWARF subrange.
The count field is necessary because there isn't a difference between the 'lo'
and 'hi' attributes for a one-element array and a zero-element array. When the
count is '0', we know that this is a zero-element array. When it's >=1, then
it's a normal constant sized array. When it's -1, then the array is unbounded.

llvm-svn: 169218
2012-12-04 06:20:49 +00:00
Eric Christopher 0f23b82147 Revert "Use the 'count' attribute instead of the 'upper_bound' attribute."
temporarily as it is breaking the gdb bots.

This reverts commit r167806/e7ff4c14b157746b3e0228d2dce9f70712d1c126.

llvm-svn: 167886
2012-11-13 23:30:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling f454dfb6b5 Use the 'count' attribute instead of the 'upper_bound' attribute.
If we have a type 'int a[1]' and a type 'int b[0]', the generated DWARF is the
same for both of them because we use the 'upper_bound' attribute. Instead use
the 'count' attrbute, which gives the correct number of elements in the array.
<rdar://problem/12566646>

llvm-svn: 167806
2012-11-13 02:31:47 +00:00
Devang Patel 107e8ec30d DISubrange supports unsigned lower/upper array bounds, so let's not fake it in the end while emitting DWARF. If a FE needs to encode signed lower/upper array bounds then we need to extend DISubrange or ad DISignedSubrange.
llvm-svn: 144937
2011-11-17 23:43:15 +00:00