These three classes have no external dependencies, but they are used
from various low-level APIs. Moving them down to Utility improves
overall code layering (although it still does not break any particular
dependency completely).
The XCode project will need to be updated after this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49740
llvm-svn: 339127
Summary: This resolves unnecessary the header dependency from
Core to DataFormatters. Patch is necessary for the introduction of
C++ modules to the LLDB build system.
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47409
llvm-svn: 333342
that takes a prefix string. This simplifies the implementation and
allows plugins such as the Swift plugin to supply different prefixes
for return and error variables.
rdar://problem/39299889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46088
llvm-svn: 331235
so it can be shared across multiple language plugins.
In a multi-language project it is counterintuitive to have a result
variables reuse numbers just because they are using a different
language plugin in LLDB (but not for example, when they are
Objective-C versus C++, since they are both handled by Clang).
This is NFC on llvm.org except for the Go plugin.
rdar://problem/39299889
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46083
llvm-svn: 331234
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
ValueObject methods.
Using ArrayRef allows us to remove some overloads, work with more array-like
types, and avoid some std::vector temporaries.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32518
llvm-svn: 301441
This adjusts header file includes for headers and source files
in Core. In doing so, one dependency cycle is eliminated
because all the includes from Core to that project were dead
includes anyway. In places where some files in other projects
were only compiling due to a transitive include from another
header, fixups have been made so that those files also include
the header they need. Tested on Windows and Linux, and plan
to address failures on OSX and FreeBSD after watching the
bots.
llvm-svn: 299714
Summary:
Calling ValueObject::SetName from a sythetic child provider would change
the underying value object used for the non-synthetic child as well what
is clearly unintentional.
Reviewers: jingham, labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31371
llvm-svn: 299259
Summary:
After this change a sythetic child provider can generate a special child
named "$$dereference$$" what if present is used when "operator*" or
"operator->" used on a ValueObject. The goal of the change is to make
expressions like "up->foo" work inside the "frame variable" command.
Reviewers: labath, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31368
llvm-svn: 299251
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
With this patch, the only dependency left is from Utility
to Host. After this is broken, Utility will finally be
standalone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29909
llvm-svn: 295088
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
This concludes the changes I originally tried to make and then
had to back out. This way if anything is still broken, it
should be easier to bisect it back to a more specific changeset.
llvm-svn: 287367
The scanning algorithm had a few little subtleties that I
overlooked, but this patch should fix everything.
I still haven't changed the function to take a StringRef since
that has some trickle down effect and is mostly mechanical,
I just wanted to get the tricky part as isolated as possible.
llvm-svn: 287354
This argument was only used in one place in the codebase, and
it was in a non-critical log statement and can be easily
substituted for an equally meaningful field instead. The
payoff of computing this value is not worth the added
complexity.
llvm-svn: 287315
Apparently these two enormous functions were dead. Which is
good, since one was largely a copy of another function with
only a few minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 287308
Originally I converted this entire function and all dependents
to use StringRef, but there were some test failures that
were tricky to track down, as this is a complicated function.
So I'm starting over, this time in smaller increments.
llvm-svn: 287307
This is a large API change that removes the two functions from
StreamString that return a std::string& and a const std::string&,
and instead provide one function which returns a StringRef.
Direct access to the underlying buffer violates the concept of
a "stream" which is intended to provide forward only access,
and makes porting to llvm::raw_ostream more difficult in the
future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26698
llvm-svn: 287152
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
"frame variable" and "target variable" are trying to emulate the expression parser when doing things like:
(lldb) frame variable &my_struct.my_bitfield
And since the expression parser doesn't allow this, we shouldn't allow "frame variable" or "target variable" to succeed.
<rdar://problem/27208607>
llvm-svn: 274703
Currently, the DataExtractor::GetMaxU64Bitfield and GetMaxS64Bitfield
routines assume the incoming "bitfield_bit_offset" parameter uses
little-endian bit numbering, i.e. a bitfield_bit_offset 0 refers to
a bitfield whose least-significant bit coincides with the least-
significant bit of the surrounding integer.
On many big-endian systems, however, the big-endian bit numbering
is used for bit fields. Here, a bitfield_bit_offset 0 refers to
a bitfield whose most-significant bit conincides with the most-
significant bit of the surrounding integer.
Now, in principle LLDB could arbitrarily choose which semantics of
bitfield_bit_offset to use. However, there are two problems with
the current approach:
- When parsing DWARF, LLDB decodes bit offsets in little-endian
bit numbering on LE systems, but in big-endian bit numbering
on BE systems. Passing those offsets later on into the
DataExtractor routines gives incorrect results on BE.
- In the interim, LLDB's type layer combines byte and bit offsets
into a single number. I.e. instead of recording bitfields by
specifying the byte offset and byte size of the surrounding
integer *plus* the bit offset of the bit field within that field,
it simply records a single bit offset number.
Now, note that converting from byte offset + bit offset to a
single offset value and back is well-defined if we either use
little-endian byte order *and* little-endian bit numbering,
or use big-endian byte order *and* big-endian bit numbering.
Any other combination will yield incorrect results.
Therefore, the simplest approach would seem to be to always use
the bit numbering that matches the system byte order. This makes
storing a single bit offset valid, and makes the existing DWARF
code correct. The only place to fix is to teach DataExtractor
to use big-endian bit numbering on big endian systems.
However, there is only additional caveat: we also get bit offsets
from LLDB synthetic bitfields. While the exact semantics of those
doesn't seem to be well-defined, from test cases it appears that
the intent was for the user-provided synthetic bitfield offset to
always use little-endian bit numbering. Therefore, on a big-endian
system we now have to convert those to big-endian bit numbering
to remain consistent.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18982
llvm-svn: 266312
When the parent of an expression is anonymous, skip adding '.' or '->' before the expression name.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18005
llvm-svn: 263166
This patch adds support for printing global static const variables which are given a DW_AT_const_value DWARF tag by clang.
Fix for bug https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25653
Reviewers: clayborg, tberghammer
Subscribers: emaste, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15576
llvm-svn: 255887
This latter determination may or may not be possible on a per-language basis; and neither is mandatory to implement for any language
Use this knowledge in the ValueObjectPrinter to generalize the notion of IsObjCNil() and the respective printout
llvm-svn: 252663
In this way, when a language needs to tell itself things that are not bound to a type but to a value (imagine a base-class relation, this is not about the type, but about the ValueObject), it can do so in a clean and general fashion
The interpretation of the values of the flags is, of course, up to the language that owns the value (the value object's runtime language, that is)
llvm-svn: 252503
Summary:
Along with this, support for an optional argument to the "num_children"
method of a Python synthetic child provider has also been added. These have
been added with the following use case in mind:
Synthetic child providers currently have a method "has_children" and
"num_children". While the former is good enough to know if there are
children, it does not give any insight into how many children there are.
Though the latter serves this purpose, calculating the number for children
of a data structure could be an O(N) operation if the data structure has N
children. The new method added in this change provide a middle ground.
One can call GetNumChildren(K) to know if a child exists at an index K
which can be as large as the callers tolerance can be. If the caller wants
to know about children beyond K, it can make an other call with 2K. If the
synthetic child provider maintains state about it counting till K
previosly, then the next call is only an O(K) operation. Infact, all
calls made progressively with steps of K will be O(K) operations.
Reviewers: vharron, clayborg, granata.enrico
Subscribers: labath, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13778
llvm-svn: 250930
The ClangExpressionVariable::CreateVariableInList functions looked cute, but
caused more confusion than they solved. I removed them, and instead made sure
that there are adequate facilities for easily adding newly-constructed
ExpressionVariables to lists.
I also made some of the constructors that are common be generic, so that it's
possible to construct expression variables from generic places (like the ABI and
ValueObject) without having to know the specifics about the class.
llvm-svn: 249095
Also added some target-level search functions so that persistent variables and
symbols can be searched for without hand-iterating across the map of
TypeSystems.
llvm-svn: 249027
Pavel Labath