Summary:
Experiments show that on Android the current values result in too much
of the memory consumption for all quarantined chunks.
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: mgorny, danalbert, srhines, llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Patch by Aleksey Shlyapnikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27873
llvm-svn: 290218
Summary:
With the previous modifications, the code works on ARM32. The random shuffle
test is unsupported on 32-bit platforms for the moment and being marked as
such. There is no hardware support for the checksum computation yet, this will
come at a later point.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rengolin, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27957
llvm-svn: 290201
Summary:
After rL289878/rL289881, the build on FreeBSD is broken, because
sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc attempts to include <utmp.h> and use
`struct utmp`, neither of which are supported anymore on FreeBSD.
Fix this by adding `&& !SANITIZER_FREEBSD` in a few places, and stop
intercepting utmp functions altogether for FreeBSD.
Reviewers: kubabrecka, emaste, eugenis, ed
Subscribers: ed, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27902
llvm-svn: 290167
In ASan, we have __asan_locate_address and __asan_get_alloc_stack, which is used in LLDB/Xcode to show the allocation backtrace for a heap memory object. This patch implements the same for TSan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27656
llvm-svn: 290119
Missed a couple of files:
- Using #pragma once
- Missing top-matter for headers
- Missing an include for <cstdint>
Follow-up on D25360.
llvm-svn: 290079
Summary:
Getting rid of the distance number altogether because:
- a person knowledgeable enough to know what the message means will also
know how to do hexadecimal math (with the help of a calculator)
- numbers outside INT_MIN - INT_MAX are hard to comprehend anyway
This unbreaks the case when you dynamically link a library with XRay and
it exits pre-main() with a not very informative static string.
Author: pelikan
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27894
llvm-svn: 290074
projects/compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_trampoline_x86_64.S:33:7: error: unexpected token in '.endm' directive
.endm SAVE_REGISTERS
^
projects/compiler-rt/lib/xray/xray_trampoline_x86_64.S:52:7: error: unexpected token in '.endm' directive
.endm RESTORE_REGISTERS
^
Remove the trailing name on the `.endm` which does not take the name of the
macro. This should bring the compiler-rt build bot back into working state.
llvm-svn: 289852
Summary:
With the recent changes to the Secondary, we use less bits for UnusedBytes,
which allows us in return to increase the bits used for Offset. That means
that we can use a Primary SizeClassMap allowing for a larger maximum size.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27816
llvm-svn: 289838
We already have an interceptor for __shared_weak_count::__release_shared, this patch handles __shared_count::__release_shared in the same way. This should get rid of TSan false positives when using std::future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27797
llvm-svn: 289831
Summary:
The layout of all registers saved on stack shouldn't deviate and will be reused in future trampolines as well.
While there, fix whitespace and clarify comments.
Author: mpel
Reviewers: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27799
llvm-svn: 289789
Objects may move during the garbage collection, and JVM needs
to notify ThreadAnalyzer about that. The new function
__tsan_java_find eliminates the need to maintain these
objects both in ThreadAnalyzer and JVM.
Author: Alexander Smundak (asmundak)
Reviewed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D27720
llvm-svn: 289682
Summary:
Now that we are not rounding up the sizes passed to the secondary allocator,
the memalign test could run out of aligned addresses to return for larger
alignments. We now reduce the size of the quarantine for that test, and
allocate less chunks for the larger alignments.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27760
llvm-svn: 289665
Summary:
I atually had an integer overflow on 32-bit with D27428 that didn't reproduce
locally, as the test servers would manage allocate addresses in the 0xffffxxxx
range, which led to some issues when rounding addresses.
At this point, I feel that Scudo could benefit from having its own combined
allocator, as we don't get any benefit from the current one, but have to work
around some hurdles (alignment checks, rounding up that is no longer needed,
extraneous code).
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubabrecka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27681
llvm-svn: 289572
This doesn't work at all on big-endian systems, even just reading in the
magic bytes in the binary .sancov file header gets byte order wrong.
llvm-svn: 289539
fatal error: error in backend: Global variable '__sancov_gen_' has an
invalid section specifier '__sancov_guards': mach-o section specifier
requires a segment and section separated by a comma.
llvm-svn: 289507
Summary:
This should improve the error messages generated providing a bit more
information when the failures are printed out. One example of a
contrived error looks like:
```
Expected: (Buffers.getBuffer(Buf)) != (std::error_code()), actual:
system:0 vs system:0
```
Because we're using error codes, the default printing gets us more
useful information in case of failure.
This is a follow-up on D26232.
Reviewers: rSerge
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27495
llvm-svn: 289501
This is used when building builtins for multiple targets as part
of LLVM runtimes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26653
llvm-svn: 289489
This target doesn't currently do anything, but it is required by
the runtimes build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27640
llvm-svn: 289420
In certain OS versions, it was possible that libmalloc replaced the sanitizer zone from being the default zone (i.e. being in malloc_zones[0]). This patch introduces a failsafe that makes sure we always stay the default zone. No testcase for this, because this doesn't reproduce under normal circumstances.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27083
llvm-svn: 289376
We currently have a interceptor for malloc_create_zone, which returns a new zone that redirects all the zone requests to our sanitizer zone. However, calling malloc_destroy_zone on that zone will cause libmalloc to print out some warning messages, because the zone is not registered in the list of zones. This patch handles this and adds a testcase for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27083
llvm-svn: 289375
Diana Picus