Use the content of the Polly wiki page[1] to create a new website. I do not yet
plan to officially promote this website, but it is already a solid base that we
can improve and peer review.
[1] http://wiki.llvm.org/Polly
llvm-svn: 130689
When an interfering live range ends at a dead slot index between two
instructions, make sure that the inserted copy instruction gets a slot index
after the dead ones. This makes it possible to avoid the interference.
Ideally, there shouldn't be interference ending at a deleted instruction, but
physical register coalescing can sometimes do that to sub-registers.
This fixes PR9823.
llvm-svn: 130687
This makes a difference if a live interval is referring to a deleted
instruction. It can be important to insert an instruction before or after a
deleted instruction to avoid interference.
llvm-svn: 130686
comments claimed it did this, but the LHS value was actually an unused variable.
The new system considers only the '-foo' part when comparing it for typos
against flags that have values, but still look at the whole string for flags
that don't. That way, we'll still correct '-inst=combine' to '-instcombine'.
llvm-svn: 130685
This test seeks a verbose comment in output. By default, "-integrated-as" sets verbose-asm. Cygming is not ready for -integrated-as yet.
llvm-svn: 130681
Invalid that was never read from again, causing non-type-template-parms to be
marked valid when in fact they weren't.
This was caught by GCC 4.6's -Wunused-but-set-variable warning.
llvm-svn: 130680
Devang, can we remove this call entirely? If I try that, "make check" passes
but the call has a side-effect of ensuring that the block's context exists in
the debug info. getContextDescriptor() is used in a void context for that side-
effect elsewhere in this file. Please take a look!
llvm-svn: 130679
Decl actually found via name lookup & overload resolution when that Decl
is different from the ValueDecl which is actually referenced by the
expression.
This can be used by AST consumers to correctly attribute references to
the spelling location of a using declaration, and otherwise gain insight
into the name resolution performed by Clang.
The public interface to DRE is kept as narrow as possible: we provide
a getFoundDecl() which always returns a NamedDecl, either the ValueDecl
referenced or the new, more precise NamedDecl if present. This way AST
clients can code against getFoundDecl without know when exactly the AST
has a split representation.
For an example of the data this provides consider:
% cat x.cc
namespace N1 {
struct S {};
void f(const S&);
}
void test(N1::S s) {
f(s);
using N1::f;
f(s);
}
% ./bin/clang -fsyntax-only -Xclang -ast-dump x.cc
[...]
void test(N1::S s) (CompoundStmt 0x5b02010 <x.cc:5:20, line:9:1>
(CallExpr 0x5b01df0 <line:6:3, col:6> 'void'
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01dd8 <col:3> 'void (*)(const struct N1::S &)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01d80 <col:3> 'void (const struct N1::S &)' lvalue Function 0x5b01a20 'f' 'void (const struct N1::S &)'))
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01e20 <col:5> 'const struct N1::S' lvalue <NoOp>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01d58 <col:5> 'N1::S':'struct N1::S' lvalue ParmVar 0x5b01b60 's' 'N1::S':'struct N1::S')))
(DeclStmt 0x5b01ee0 <line:7:3, col:14>
0x5b01e40 "UsingN1::;")
(CallExpr 0x5b01fc8 <line:8:3, col:6> 'void'
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01fb0 <col:3> 'void (*)(const struct N1::S &)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01f80 <col:3> 'void (const struct N1::S &)' lvalue Function 0x5b01a20 'f' 'void (const struct N1::S &)' (UsingShadow 0x5b01ea0 'f')))
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01ff8 <col:5> 'const struct N1::S' lvalue <NoOp>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01f58 <col:5> 'N1::S':'struct N1::S' lvalue ParmVar 0x5b01b60 's' 'N1::S':'struct N1::S'))))
Now we can tell that the second call is 'using' (no pun intended) the using
declaration, and *which* using declaration it sees. Without this, we can
mistake calls that go through using declarations for ADL calls, and have no way
to attribute names looked up with using declarations to the appropriate
UsingDecl.
llvm-svn: 130670
parameter node and use this to correctly mangle parameter
references in function template signatures.
A follow-up patch will improve the storage usage of these
fields; here I've just done the lazy thing.
llvm-svn: 130669
NestedNameSpecifierLoc. It predates when we had such an object.
Reference the NNSLoc directly in DREs, and embed it directly into the
MemberNameQualifier struct.
llvm-svn: 130668
Mostly trailing whitespace so that me editor nuking it doesn't muddy the
waters of subsequent commits that do change functionality.
Also nukes a stray statement that was harmless but redundant that
I introduced in r130666.
llvm-svn: 130667
a bitfield in the base class. DREs weren't using any bits here past the
normal Expr bits, so we have plenty of room. This makes the common case
of getting a Decl out of a DRE no longer need to do any masking etc.
Also, while here, clean up code to use the accessor methods rather than
directly poking these bits, and provide a nice comment for DREs that
includes the information previously attached to the bits going into the
pointer union.
No functionality changed here, but DREs should be a tad faster now.
llvm-svn: 130666
3 lines of code and improve a bunch of information in the libclang view
of the code.
Updates the two tests that exercise this with the new data, checking
that each new source location actually points back to the declared
template parameter.
llvm-svn: 130656
instead of 'int'.
The Embarcadero spec says 'unsigned int', not 'int'. That's what
'size_t' is on Windows, but for Clang using a 'size_t' that can be
larger than int seems more appropriate.
llvm-svn: 130653
functions already precluded dependent types from reaching them.
Also change one of the callers to not error when a trait is applied to
a dependent type. This is a perfectly reasonable pattern, and both Unary
and Binary type traits already support dependent types (by populating
the AST with a nonce value).
Remove the actual diagnostic, since these aren't errors.
llvm-svn: 130651
a switch with any default case. This both warns when an enumerator is
missing and asserts if a value sneaks through despite the warning.
While in there fix a bunch of coding style issues with this code.
llvm-svn: 130648
Rafael Espindola