Initialize CommonOptionsParser with ZeroOrOne NumOccurrenceFlag so callers can
pass -list-checks without the need to pass additional positional parameters,
then add dummy file if none were supplied.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12070
Patch by Don Hinton!
llvm-svn: 245205
Added an additional ctor that takes a NumOccurrenceFlag parameter for the
SourcePaths option. This frees applications from always having to pass at least
one source file, e.g., -list-checks.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12069
Patch by Don Hinton!
llvm-svn: 245204
This allows the code generation to continue working even if a needed
value (that is reloaded anyway) was not yet demoted. Instead of
failing it will now create the location for future demotion to memory
and load from that location. The stores will use the same location and
by construction execute before the load even if the textual order in
the generated AST is otherwise.
Reviewers: grosser, Meinersbur
Subscribers: #polly
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12072
llvm-svn: 245203
There are some DLLs whose initializers depends on other DLLs'
initializers. The initialization order matters for them.
MSVC linker uses the order of the libraries from the command line.
LLD used ASCII-betical order. So they were incompatible.
This patch makes LLD compatible with MSVC.
llvm-svn: 245201
These only get generated if the target supports them. If one of the variants is not legal and the other is, and it is safe to do so, the other variant will be emitted.
For example on AArch32 (V8), we have scalar fminnm but not fmin.
Fix up a couple of tests while we're here - one now produces better code, and the other was just plain wrong to start with.
llvm-svn: 245196
PR24469 resulted because DeleteDeadInstruction in handleNonLocalStoreDeletion was
deleting the next basic block iterator. Fixed the same by resetting the basic block iterator
post call to DeleteDeadInstruction.
llvm-svn: 245195
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.
I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.
But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.
To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.
To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.
With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063
llvm-svn: 245193
This is a very minimal move support - it leaves the moved-from object in
a zombie state that is only valid for destruction and move assignment.
This seems fine to me, and leaving it in the default constructed state
would require adding more state to the object and potentially allocating
memory (!!!) and so seems like a Bad Idea.
llvm-svn: 245192
If we can ignore NaNs, fmin/fmax libcalls can become compare and select
(this is what we turn std::min / std::max into).
This IR should then be optimized in the backend to whatever is best for
any given target. Eg, x86 can use minss/maxss instructions.
This should solve PR24314:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11866
llvm-svn: 245187
This test case crashes the scalar code generation as we are not
consistent with the usage of the assumed context. To be precise, we
use the assumed context for the dependence analysis but not to
restrict the domains of the statements.
A step by step explanation of the problem is given in the test case.
llvm-svn: 245176
This option allows the user to provide additional information about parameter
values as an isl_set. To specify that N has the value 1024, we can provide
the context -polly-context='[N] -> {: N = 1024}'.
llvm-svn: 245175
Bitwise arithmetic can obscure a simple sign-test. If replacing the
mask with a truncate is preferable if the type is legal because it
permits us to rephrase the comparison more explicitly.
llvm-svn: 245171
analysis ...
It turns out that we *do* need the old CallGraph ported to the new pass
manager. There are times where this model of a call graph is really
superior to the one provided by the LazyCallGraph. For example,
GlobalsModRef very specifically needs the model provided by CallGraph.
While here, I've tried to make the move semantics actually work. =]
llvm-svn: 245170
We can set additional bits in a mask given that we know the other
operand of an AND already has some bits set to zero. This can be more
efficient if doing so allows us to use an instruction which implicitly
sign extends the immediate.
This fixes PR24085.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11289
llvm-svn: 245169
ByteSize and BitSize should not be size_t but unsigned, considering
1) They are at most 2^16 and 2^19, respectively.
2) BitSize is an argument to Type::getIntNTy which takes unsigned.
Also, use the correct utostr instead itostr and cache the string result.
Thanks to James Touton for reporting this!
llvm-svn: 245167
For cases where we TRUNCATE and then ZERO_EXTEND to a larger size (often from vector legalization), see if we can mask the source data and then ZERO_EXTEND (instead of after a ANY_EXTEND). This can help avoid having to generate a larger mask, and possibly applying it to several sub-vectors.
(zext (truncate x)) -> (zext (and(x, m))
Includes a minor patch to SystemZ to better recognise 8/16-bit zero extension patterns from RISBG bit-extraction code.
This is the first of a number of minor patches to help improve the conversion of byte masks to clear mask shuffles.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11764
llvm-svn: 245160
The July issue of TOPLAS contains a 50 page discussion of the AST generation
techniques used in Polly. This discussion gives not only an in-depth
description of how we (re)generate an imperative AST from our polyhedral based
mathematical program description, but also gives interesting insights about:
- Schedule trees: A tree-based mathematical program description that enables us
to perform loop transformations on an abstract level, while issues like the
generation of the correct loop structure and loop bounds will be taken care of
by our AST generator.
- Polyhedral unrolling: We discuss techniques that allow the unrolling of
non-trivial loops in the context of parameteric loop bounds, complex tile
shapes and conditionally executed statements. Such unrolling support enables
the generation of predicated code e.g. in the context of GPGPU computing.
- Isolation for full/partial tile separation: We discuss native support for
handling full/partial tile separation and -- in general -- native support for
isolation of boundary cases to enable smooth code generation for core
computations.
- AST generation with modulo constraints: We discuss how modulo mappings are
lowered to efficient C/LLVM code.
- User-defined constraint sets for run-time checks We discuss how arbitrary
sets of constraints can be used to automatically create run-time checks that
ensure a set of constrainst actually hold. This feature is very useful to
verify at run-time various assumptions that have been taken program
optimization.
Polyhedral AST generation is more than scanning polyhedra
Tobias Grosser, Sven Verdoolaege, Albert Cohen
ACM Transations on Programming Languages and Systems (TOPLAS), 37(4), July 2015
llvm-svn: 245157
infrastructure.
This AA was never used in tree. It's infrastructure also completely
overlaps that of TargetLibraryInfo which is used heavily by BasicAA to
achieve similar goals to those stated for this analysis.
As has come up in several discussions, the use case here is still really
important, but this code isn't helping move toward that use case. Any
progress on better supporting rich AA information for runtime library
environments would likely be better off starting from scratch or
starting from TargetLibraryInfo than from this base.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12028
llvm-svn: 245155
numbers in the key name "ehframe" or "eh_frame" in addition to the deprecated
"gcc" name (e.g. from a plugin.process.gdb-remote.target-definition-file
python file).
llvm-svn: 245151
Alexander Kornienko