This was changed recently with D90554 / f7eac51b9b
...because we had a regression testing blindspot for intrinsics
that are expected to be lowered to libcalls.
In general, we want the *size* cost for a scalar call to be cheap
even if the other costs are expensive - we expect it to just be
a branch with some optional stack manipulation.
It is likely that we will want to carve out some
exceptions/overrides to this rule as follow-up patches for
calls that have some general and/or target-specific difference
to the expected lowering.
This was noticed as a regression in unrolling, so we have a test
for that now along with a couple of direct cost model tests.
If the assumed scalarization costs for the oversized vector
calls are not realistic, that would be another follow-up
refinement of the cost models.
Clang supports compiling CUDA source files,
CUDA header files may contain CUDA specific code
that is why they have special extension, which
can be recognized by nvcc (CUDA compiler driver)
as CUDA source file.
Format them by default as well.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: tomilov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90780
See discussion in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45073 / https://reviews.llvm.org/D66324#2334485
the implementation is known-broken for certain inputs,
the bugreport was up for a significant amount of timer,
and there has been no activity to address it.
Therefore, just completely rip out all of misexpect handling.
I suspect, fixing it requires redesigning the internals of MD_misexpect.
Should anyone commit to fixing the implementation problem,
starting from clean slate may be better anyways.
This reverts commit 7bdad08429,
and some of it's follow-ups, that don't stand on their own.
This unit test code was using malloc without a corresponding free.
When the system malloc is not being overridden by the code under
test, it might an asan/lsan allocator that notices leaks.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91472
motivated by a refactoring in the new sparse code (yet to be merged), this avoids some lengthy code dup
Reviewed By: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91465
This library is only used in Flang at the moment and not tested withing LLVM.
Having it as a component is breaking llvm-config:
$ bin/llvm-config --shared-mode
llvm-config: error: component libraries and shared library
llvm-config: error: missing: [...]/lib/libLLVMFrontendOpenACC.a
This will reverted when unit-tests are provided for it.
Reviewed By: clementval
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91470
I think the check for whether the process is connected is totally bogus
in the first place, but on the off-chance that's it's not, we should
behave the same in synchronous and asynchronous mode.
This assertion ensures the input value isn't part of the vector when
growing is required. In such cases the vector will grow and the input
value is invalidated before being read from.
This found 14 failed Tests.
Reviewed By: bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84293
The code has a few sequence that looked like:
Ops.push_back(Ops[0]);
Ops.erase(Ops.begin());
And are equivalent to:
std::rotate(Ops.begin(), Ops.begin() + 1, Ops.end());
The latter has the advantage of never reallocating the vector, which
would be a bug in the original code as push_back would read from the
memory it deallocated.
When comparing arrays whose shapes do not conform, the contant folding
code ran into problems trying to get the value of an extent that did not
exist. There were actually two problems. First, the routine
"CheckConformance()" was returning "true" when the compiler was unable
to get the extent of an array. Second, the function
"ApplyElementwise()" was calling "CheckConformance()" prior to folding
the elements of two arrays, but it was ignoring the return value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91440
When the load value is folded into the sin/cos operation, the
AMDGPU library calls simplifier could still mark the function
as unmodified. Instead ensure if there is an early return,
return whether the load was folded into the sin/cos call.
Authored by MJDSys
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91401
I'm not why it was added to DAGToDAG oringally but it seems
to make sense alongside the non-TLS version: LowerGlobalAddress
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91432
Since RPATH initialization was disabled for the runtime libraries to
avoid overwriting RPATH unconditionally we need to explicity set up it
for the Win to Arm Linux cross builds.
See some details here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91099
dependency. NFC
Use findSingleDependency in place of FindDependencies and stop passing a
set of Instructions around. Modify FindDependencies to return a boolean
flag which indicates whether the dependencies it has found are all
valid.
Add a convenience matcher which handles
```
G_XOR %not_reg, -1
```
And a convenience matcher which returns true if an integer constant is
all-ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91459
Make it required. Since it's a module pass, optnone won't test it, so
extend the clang test to also use opt-bisect now that it's supported.
14/16 check-dfsan tests failed with NPM enabled, now all pass.
Reviewed By: leonardchan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91385
ValueTracking was using a more powerful abs() implementation. Roll
it into KnownBits::abs(). Also add an exhaustive test for abs(),
in both the poisoning and non-poisoning variants.
Clean up the logic for `err_fe_{pch,module,ast}_file_modified` to use a
`select` like other ASTReader diagnostics. There should be no
functionality change here, just a cleanup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91367
Support multi-dimension vector for InsertMap/ExtractMap op and update the
transformations. Currently the relation between IDs and dimension is implicitly
deduced from the types. We can then calculate an AffineMap based on it. In the
future the AffineMap could be part of the operation itself.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90995
Like inlineCallIfPossible and InlinerPass, after inlining mergeAttributesForInlining
should be called to merge callee's attributes to caller. But it is not called in
AlwaysInliner, causes caller's attributes inconsistent with inlined code.
Attached test case demonstrates that attribute "min-legal-vector-width"="512" is
not merged into caller without this patch, and it causes failure in SelectionDAG
when lowering the inlined AVX512 intrinsic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91446
This RUN line was added as a temporary measure to undo the damage done
by D79655. Everyone's build system should be fine by now.
Reviewed By: tlively
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91448
I only have a crash report for this. I could reproduce it with a slightly older
lldb by running an expression that called pthread_kill, but we started making modules
for our expression JIT code, so that no longer triggers the bug. I can't think of another
good way to test it but the fix is obvious.
All three diagnostics have a select between "PCH", "module", and "AST"
in the text. The most generic of these is "AST", so rename them from
`err_module_...` to `err_ast_...`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91436
Sanjay Patel