That used to fail in the last testcase function because after
%0:sreg_64.sub0 was folded into %3:sreg_32_xm0_xexec COPY, it
was further folded into S_STORE_DWORD_IMM. Its legal effective
subreg class is SReg_32 while instruction expects more restricted
SReg_32_XM0_EXEC. However, SIInstrInfo::isLegalRegOperand()
passed the legality check and it was caught in the verifier.
Borrowed code from the verifier to check for RC legality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69445
Stanislav Mekhanoshin