Implement computeKnownBitsForTargetInstr for G_AMDGPU_BUFFER_LOAD_UBYTE
and G_AMDGPU_BUFFER_LOAD_USHORT. This allows generic combines to remove
some unnecessary G_ANDs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89316
The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
Fixes selection for scalar G_SMULH/G_UMULH. Also switches to using
tablegen selected add/sub, which switch to the signed version of the
opcode. This matches the current DAG behavior. We can't drop the
manual selection for add/sub yet, because it's still both for VALU
add/sub and for G_PTR_ADD.
Use intermediate instructions, unlike with buffer stores. This is
necessary because of the need to have an internal way to distinguish
between signed and unsigned extloads. This introduces some duplication
and near duplication with the buffer store selection path. The store
handling should maybe be moved into legalization to match and
eliminate the duplication.
Jay Foad