Passes that are run after the post-RA scheduler may insert instructions like
waitcnt which eliminate the need for certain noops. After this patch the
scheduler is still aware of possible latency from hazards but noops will
not be inserted until the dedicated hazard recognizer pass is run.
Depends on D89753.
Reviewed By: foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89754
Change waitcnt insertion to check the memory operand tokens to see if
flat memory operations access VMEM in the same way it does to check if
accessing LDS. This avoids adding waitcnt for counters for address
spaces that are not accessed.
In addition, only generate the pessimistic waitcnt 0 if a flat memory
operation appears to access both VMEM and LDS.
This benefits flat memory operations that explicitly specify the
address space as GLOBAL or LOCAL.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89618
Handle workitem intrinsics. There isn't really away to adequately test
this right now, since none of the known bits users are fine grained
enough to test the edge conditions. This triggers a number of
instances of the new 64-bit to 32-bit shift combine in the existing
tests.
tryLatency compares two sched candidates. For the top zone it prefers
the one with lesser depth, but only if that depth is greater than the
total latency of the instructions we've already scheduled -- otherwise
its latency would be hidden and there would be no stall.
Unfortunately it only tests the depth of one of the candidates. This can
lead to situations where the TopDepthReduce heuristic does not kick in,
but a lower priority heuristic chooses the other candidate, whose depth
*is* greater than the already scheduled latency, which causes a stall.
The fix is to apply the heuristic if the depth of *either* candidate is
greater than the already scheduled latency.
All this also applies to the BotHeightReduce heuristic in the bottom
zone.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72392
Summary:
Make use of both the - (1) clustered bytes and (2) cluster length, to decide on
the max number of mem ops that can be clustered. On an average, when loads
are dword or smaller, consider `5` as max threshold, otherwise `4`. This
heuristic is purely based on different experimentation conducted, and there is
no analytical logic here.
Reviewers: foad, rampitec, arsenm, vpykhtin
Reviewed By: rampitec
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kerbowa, hiraditya, t-tye, Anastasia, tpr, dstuttard, yaxunl, nhaehnle, wdng, jvesely, kzhuravl, thakis
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82393
Summary:
Make use of both the - (1) clustered bytes and (2) cluster length, to decide on
the max number of mem ops that can be clustered. On an average, when loads
are dword or smaller, consider `5` as max threshold, otherwise `4`. This heuristic
is purely based on different experimentation conducted, and there is no analytical
logic here.
Reviewers: foad, rampitec, arsenm, vpykhtin
Reviewed By: foad, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, Anastasia, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81085
Enable clausing of memory loads on gfx10 by adding a new pass to insert
the s_clause instructions that mark the start of each hard clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79792
Austin Kerbow