Commit Graph

45 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer 942003acc6 Do (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1 rather than (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A | (C1 ^ C2)) == C2 when C1 ^ C2 is a power of 2.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14223

Patch by Amaury SECHET!

llvm-svn: 254518
2015-12-02 16:15:07 +00:00
David Blaikie a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
David Majnemer 3d6f80b619 InstCombine: FoldOrOfICmps harder
We may be in a situation where the icmps might not be near each other in
a tree of or instructions.  Try to dig out related compare instructions
and see if they combine.

N.B.  This won't fire on deep trees of compares because rewritting the
tree might end up creating a net increase of IR.  We may have to resort
to something more sophisticated if this is a real problem.

llvm-svn: 222928
2014-11-28 19:58:29 +00:00
Yi Jiang 1a4e73d7bf New InstCombine pattern: (icmp ult/ule (A + C1), C3) | (icmp ult/ule (A + C2), C3) to (icmp ult/ule ((A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) + max(C1, C2)), C3) under certain condition
llvm-svn: 216135
2014-08-20 22:55:40 +00:00
David Majnemer f1eda23514 Added InstCombine Transform for ((B | C) & A) | B -> B | (A & C)
Transform ((B | C) & A) | B --> B | (A & C)

Z3 Link: http://rise4fun.com/Z3/hP6p

Patch by Sonam Kumari!

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4865

llvm-svn: 215619
2014-08-14 06:41:38 +00:00
Suyog Sarda 52324c82cc This patch implements transform for pattern "( A & (~B)) | (A ^ B) -> (A ^ B)"
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4652

llvm-svn: 214477
2014-08-01 04:50:31 +00:00
Suyog Sarda 16d646594e This patch implements transform for pattern "(A & B) | ((~A) ^ B) -> (~A ^ B)".
Patch Credit to Ankit Jain !

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4655

llvm-svn: 214476
2014-08-01 04:41:43 +00:00
Suyog Sarda d64faf6cae Added InstCombine Transform for patterns:
"((~A & B) | A) -> (A | B)" and "((A & B) | ~A) -> (~A | B)"

Original Patch credit to Ankit Jain !!

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4591

llvm-svn: 213676
2014-07-22 18:09:41 +00:00
Stephen Lin c1c7a1309c Update Transforms tests to use CHECK-LABEL for easier debugging. No functionality change.
This update was done with the following bash script:

  find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
  while read NAME; do
    echo "$NAME"
    if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
      TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
      cp $NAME $TEMP
      sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
      while read FUNC; do
        sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
      done
      mv $TEMP $NAME
    fi
  done

llvm-svn: 186268
2013-07-14 01:42:54 +00:00
David Majnemer 1fae195557 Reorders two transforms that collide with each other
One performs: (X == 13 | X == 14) -> X-13 <u 2
The other: (A == C1 || A == C2) -> (A & ~(C1 ^ C2)) == C1

The problem is that there are certain values of C1 and C2 that
trigger both transforms but the first one blocks out the second,
this generates suboptimal code.

Reordering the transforms should be better in every case and
allows us to do interesting stuff like turn:
  %shr = lshr i32 %X, 4
  %and = and i32 %shr, 15
  %add = add i32 %and, -14
  %tobool = icmp ne i32 %add, 0

into:
  %and = and i32 %X, 240
  %tobool = icmp ne i32 %and, 224

llvm-svn: 179493
2013-04-14 21:15:43 +00:00
Bill Wendling 23242098e7 The transform is:
(or (bool?A:B),(bool?C:D)) --> (bool?(or A,C):(or B,D))

By the time the OR is visited, both the SELECTs have been visited and not
optimized and the OR itself hasn't been transformed so we do this transform in
the hopes that the new ORs will be optimized.

The transform is explicitly disabled for vector-selects until "codegen matures
to handle them better".

Patch by Muhammad Tauqir!

llvm-svn: 175380
2013-02-16 23:41:36 +00:00
Eli Friedman 41e509a33d More instcombine cleanup, towards improving debug line info.
llvm-svn: 131604
2011-05-18 23:58:37 +00:00
Eli Friedman 2395626605 Add an instcombine for constructs like a | -(b != c); a select is more
canonical, and generally leads to better code.  Found while looking at
an article about saturating arithmetic.

llvm-svn: 129545
2011-04-14 22:41:27 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 68531baea9 Teach InstCombine to merge (icmp ult (X + CA), C1) | (icmp eq X, C2) into (icmp ult (X + CA), C1 + 1) if C2 + CA == C1.
InstCombine creates these so now we compile x == 23 || x == 24 || x == 25 to
  %x.off = add i32 %x, -23
  %1 = icmp ult i32 %x.off, 3
instead of
  %x.off = add i32 %x, -23
  %1 = icmp ult i32 %x.off, 2
  %cmp3 = icmp eq i32 %x, 25
  %ret2 = or i1 %1, %cmp3

llvm-svn: 122248
2010-12-20 16:18:51 +00:00
Owen Anderson c237a849e3 Re-apply r113679, which was reverted in r113720, which added a paid of new instcombine transforms
to expose greater opportunities for store narrowing in codegen.  This patch fixes a potential
infinite loop in instcombine caused by one of the introduced transforms being overly aggressive.

llvm-svn: 113763
2010-09-13 17:59:27 +00:00
Eric Christopher 26abd3e0c2 Revert 113679, it was causing an infinite loop in a testcase that I've sent
on to Owen.

llvm-svn: 113720
2010-09-12 06:09:23 +00:00
Owen Anderson 70f4524427 Invert and-of-or into or-of-and when doing so would allow us to clear bits of the and's mask.
This can result in increased opportunities for store narrowing in code generation.  Update a number of
tests for this change.  This fixes <rdar://problem/8285027>.

Additionally, because this inverts the order of ors and ands, some patterns for optimizing or-of-and-of-or
no longer fire in instances where they did originally.  Add a simple transform which recaptures most of these
opportunities: if we have an or-of-constant-or and have failed to fold away the inner or, commute the order 
of the two ors, to give the non-constant or a chance for simplification instead.

llvm-svn: 113679
2010-09-11 05:48:06 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 8c35fb0739 Teach InstructionSimplify to fold (A & B) & A -> A & B and (A | B) | A -> A | B.
Reassociate does this but it doesn't catch all cases (e.g. if the operands are i1).

llvm-svn: 113651
2010-09-10 22:39:55 +00:00
Chris Lattner ec0e7b1643 revert r108320, I see the failures now...
llvm-svn: 108322
2010-07-14 06:16:35 +00:00
Chris Lattner 658680b2f5 reapply benjamin's instcombine patch, I don't see anything wrong with it and can't repro any problems with a manual self-host.
llvm-svn: 108320
2010-07-14 05:59:13 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 8f36402ac2 Nope, still breaks the release selfhost bots :(
llvm-svn: 108153
2010-07-12 16:38:48 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 07b695e052 Reapply the "or" half of r108136, which seems to be less problematic.
llvm-svn: 108152
2010-07-12 16:15:48 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer c719e8ae9e Revert r108141 again, sigh.
llvm-svn: 108148
2010-07-12 14:42:04 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer f578c36035 Reapply 108136 with an ugly pasto fixed.
llvm-svn: 108141
2010-07-12 13:44:00 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 9675e759cf Revert r108136 until I figure out why it broke selfhost.
llvm-svn: 108139
2010-07-12 12:35:49 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 35473faa50 instcombine: fold (x & y) | (~x & z) and (x & y) ^ (~x & z) into ((y ^ z) & x) ^ z which is one instruction shorter. (PR6773)
before:
  %and = and i32 %y, %x
  %neg = xor i32 %x, -1
  %and4 = and i32 %z, %neg
  %xor = xor i32 %and4, %and

after:
  %xor1 = xor i32 %z, %y
  %and2 = and i32 %xor1, %x
  %xor = xor i32 %and2, %z

llvm-svn: 108136
2010-07-12 11:54:45 +00:00
Chris Lattner fc13a0343c make these less sensitive to temporary naming.
llvm-svn: 97799
2010-03-05 08:43:33 +00:00
Chris Lattner 8e2c471614 don't turn (A & (C0?-1:0)) | (B & ~(C0?-1:0)) -> C0 ? A : B
for vectors.  Codegen is generating awful code or segfaulting
in various cases (e.g. PR6204).

llvm-svn: 95058
2010-02-02 02:43:51 +00:00
Chris Lattner 9518869423 add one more bitfield optimization, allowing clang to generate
good code on PR4216:

_test_bitfield:                                             ## @test_bitfield
	orl	$32962, %edi
	movl	$4294941946, %eax
	andq	%rdi, %rax
	ret

instead of:

_test_bitfield:
        movl    $4294941696, %ecx
        movl    %edi, %eax
        orl     $194, %edi
        orl     $32768, %eax
        andq    $250, %rdi
        andq    %rax, %rcx
        movq    %rdi, %rax
        orq     %rcx, %rax
        ret

Evan is looking into the remaining andq+imm -> andl optimization.

llvm-svn: 93147
2010-01-11 06:55:24 +00:00
Chris Lattner 2d91231d82 implement an instcombine xform needed by clang's codegen
on the example in PR4216.  This doesn't trigger in the testsuite,
so I'd really appreciate someone scrutinizing the logic for
correctness.

llvm-svn: 92458
2010-01-04 06:03:59 +00:00
Nick Lewycky a67519be12 Fix logic error in previous commit. The != case needs to become an or, not an
and.

llvm-svn: 92419
2010-01-02 16:14:56 +00:00
Nick Lewycky 357d41b3c1 Optimize pointer comparison into the typesafe form, now that the backends will
handle them efficiently. This is the opposite direction of the transformation
we used to have here.

llvm-svn: 92418
2010-01-02 15:25:44 +00:00
Chris Lattner 2e4be2c340 remove the instcombine transformations that are inserting nasty
pointer to int casts that confuse later optimizations.  See PR3351
for details.

This improves but doesn't complete fix 483.xalancbmk because llvm-gcc
does this xform in GCC's "fold" routine as well.  Clang++ will do
better I guess.

llvm-svn: 92408
2010-01-02 00:31:05 +00:00
Chris Lattner cd261c9c26 Implement PR5634.
llvm-svn: 90046
2009-11-29 00:51:17 +00:00
Chris Lattner 683eed3286 reapply r85085 with a bugfix to avoid infinite looping.
All of the 'demorgan' related xforms need to use 
dyn_castNotVal, not m_Not.

llvm-svn: 85119
2009-10-26 15:40:07 +00:00
Evan Cheng 8014a728b9 Revert 85085. It causes infinite looping during llvm-gcc build.
llvm-svn: 85090
2009-10-26 03:51:32 +00:00
Chris Lattner 2e6564d6ff Implement PR3266 & PR5276, folding:
not (or (icmp, icmp)) -> and(icmp, icmp)

llvm-svn: 85085
2009-10-26 01:06:31 +00:00
Chris Lattner 52880b29d2 convert or.ll to filecheck and merge or2 into it.
llvm-svn: 85083
2009-10-25 23:47:55 +00:00
Dan Gohman 1880092722 Change tests from "opt %s" to "opt < %s" so that opt doesn't see the
input filename so that opt doesn't print the input filename in the
output so that grep lines in the tests don't unintentionally match
strings in the input filename.

llvm-svn: 81537
2009-09-11 18:01:28 +00:00
Dan Gohman 72a13d2476 Use opt -S instead of piping bitcode output through llvm-dis.
llvm-svn: 81257
2009-09-08 22:34:10 +00:00
Dan Gohman 9737a63ed8 Change these tests to feed the assembly files to opt directly, instead
of using llvm-as, now that opt supports this.

llvm-svn: 81226
2009-09-08 16:50:01 +00:00
Tanya Lattner 5640bd186a Remove llvm-upgrade and update test cases.
llvm-svn: 47793
2008-03-01 09:15:35 +00:00
Reid Spencer ede8c3b92c For PR1319:
Make use of the END. facility on all files > 1K so that we aren't wasting CPU
cycles searching for RUN: lines that we'll never find.

llvm-svn: 36059
2007-04-15 07:38:21 +00:00
Reid Spencer 91948d4cad For PR1319:
Upgrade tests to work with new llvm.exp version of llvm_runtest.

llvm-svn: 36013
2007-04-14 20:13:02 +00:00
Reid Spencer 83b3d82672 Regression is gone, don't try to find it on clean target.
llvm-svn: 33296
2007-01-17 07:59:14 +00:00