The matcher crashes when a variadic function pointer is invoked because the
FunctionProtoType has fewer parameters than arguments.
Matching of non-variadic arguments now works.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114559
Reviewed-by: sammccall
This contributes follow-up work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491, which
allows for increased control over the matching of lambda captures. This also
updates the documentation for the `lambdaCapture` matcher.
Reviewed By: ymandel, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113575
This provides better support for `LambdaCapture`s by making them first-
class and allowing them to be bindable. In addition, this implements several
`LambdaCapture`-related matchers. This does not update how lambdas are
traversed. As a result, something like trying to match `lambdaCapture()` by
itself will not work - it must be used as an inner matcher.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491
Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are defined in
std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace. So the existing codes wouldn't be break after update
compiler.
And in case the compiler found std::coroutine_traits and
std::experimental::coroutine_traits at the same time, it would emit an
error for it.
The support for looking up std::experimental::coroutine_traits would be
removed in Clang16.
Reviewed By: lxfind, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This was originally committed in 277623f4d5
Reverted in f9ad1d1c77 due to breakages
outside of clang - lldb seems to have some strange/strong dependence on
"char [N]" versus "char[N]" when printing strings (not due to that name
appearing in DWARF, but probably due to using clang to stringify type
names) that'll need to be addressed, plus a few other odds and ends in
other subprojects (clang-tools-extra, compiler-rt, etc).
Looks like lldb has some issues with this - somehow it causes lldb to
treat a "char[N]" type as an array of chars (prints them out
individually) but a "char [N]" is printed as a string. (even though the
DWARF doesn't have this string in it - it's something to do with the
string lldb generates for itself using clang)
This reverts commit 277623f4d5.
Based on post-commit review discussion on
2bd8493847 with Richard Smith.
Other uses of forcing HasEmptyPlaceHolder to false seem OK to me -
they're all around pointer/reference types where the pointer/reference
token will appear at the rightmost side of the left side of the type
name, so they make nested types (eg: the "int" in "int *") behave as
though there is a non-empty placeholder (because the "*" is essentially
the placeholder as far as the "int" is concerned).
This reverts commit 2fbd254aa4, which broke the libc++ CI. I'm reverting
to get things stable again until we've figured out a way forward.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Summary: Now in libcxx and clang, all the coroutine components are
defined in std::experimental namespace.
And now the coroutine TS is merged into C++20. So in the working draft
like N4892, we could find the coroutine components is defined in std
namespace instead of std::experimental namespace.
And the coroutine support in clang seems to be relatively stable. So I
think it may be suitable to move the coroutine component into the
experiment namespace now.
But move the coroutine component into the std namespace may be an break
change. So I planned to split this change into two patch. One in clang
and other in libcxx.
This patch would make clang lookup coroutine_traits in std namespace
first. For the compatibility consideration, clang would lookup in
std::experimental namespace if it can't find definitions in std
namespace and emit a warning in this case. So the existing codes
wouldn't be break after update compiler.
Test Plan: check-clang, check-libcxx
Reviewed By: lxfind
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108696
Currently, `hasUnaryOperand` fails for the overloaded `operator*`. This patch fixes the bug and
adds tests for this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104389
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
This patch adds support for matching gtest's ASSERT_THAT, EXPECT_THAT, ON_CALL and EXPECT_CALL macros.
Reviewed By: ymandel, hokein
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103195
The new matcher additionally covers blocks and Objective-C methods.
This matcher actually makes sure that the statement truly belongs
to that declaration's body. forFunction() incorrectly reported that
a statement in a nested block belonged to the surrounding function.
forFunction() is now deprecated due to the above footgun, in favor of
forCallable(functionDecl()) when only functions need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102213
Required for capturing base specifier in matchers:
`cxxRecordDecl(hasDirectBase(cxxBaseSpecifier().bind("base")))`
Reviewed By: steveire, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69218
Summary: Try to enable the support for C++20 coroutine keywords for AST
Matchers.
Reviewers: sammccall, njames93, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96316
This reverts commit 6984e0d439.
While change by itself seems to be consistent with nullPointerConstant
docs of not matching "int i = 0;" but it's not clear why it's wrong and
9148302a2a author just forgot to update
the doc.
This reverts commit 9148302a (2019-08-22) which broke the pre-existing
unit test for the matcher. Also revert commit 518b2266 (Fix the
nullPointerConstant() test to get bots back to green., 2019-08-22) which
incorrectly changed the test to expect the broken behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96665
For example, before this patch we can use has() to get from a
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator to its operand, but hasParent doesn't get
back to the cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator. This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96113
With a matcher like
expr(anyOf(integerLiteral(equals(42)), unless(expr())))
and code such as
struct B {
B(int);
};
B func1() { return 42; }
the top-level expr() would match each of the nodes which are not spelled
in the source and then ignore-traverse to match the integerLiteral node.
This would result in multiple results reported for the integerLiteral.
Fix that by only running matching logic on nodes which are not skipped
with the top-level matcher.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95735
Add an operator overload to ArgumentAdaptingMatcherFunc to allow use of
mapAnyOf within hasAncestor, hasParent etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94864
This is a simple utility which allows matching on binaryOperator and
cxxOperatorCallExpr. It can also be extended to support
cxxRewrittenBinaryOperator.
Add generic support for MapAnyOfMatchers to auto-marshalling functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94129
Make it possible to compose a matcher for different base nodes.
This accepts one or more node matcher functors and zero or more
matchers, composing the latter into the former.
This allows composing of matchers where the same inner matcher name is
used for the same concept, but with a different node functor. Currently,
there is a limitation that the nodes must be in the same "clade", so
while
mapAnyOf(ifStmt, forStmt).with(hasBody(stmt()))
can be used, functionDecl can not be added to the tuple.
It is possible to use this in clang-query, but it will require changes
to the QueryParser, so is deferred to a future review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94127
Because we don't know in ASTMatchFinder whether we're matching in AsIs
or IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode, we need to traverse the lambda
twice, but store whether we're matching in nodes spelled in source or
not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93688
Felix Berger