Use better heuristics to detect if a '{' might be the start of the constructor body
or not. Especially when there is a completion token.
Fix the test 'test/CodeCompletion/ctor-initializer.cpp ' when clang defaults to c++11
The problem was is how we recover invalid code in the ctor-init part as we skip the
function body. In particular, we want to know if a '{' is the begining of the body.
In C++03, we always consider it as the beginng of the body. The problem was that in
C++11, it may be the start of an initializer, so we skip over it, causing further
parse errors later. (It is important that we are able to parse correctly the rest
of the class definition, to know what are the class member, for example)
This commit is improving the heuristics to decide if the '{' is starting a function
body. The rules are the following: If we are not in a template argument, and that the
previous tokens are not an identifier, or a >, then it is much more likely to be the
function body. We verify that further by checking the token after the matching '}'
The commit also fix the behavior when there is a code_completion token in the
ctor-initializers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21502
llvm-svn: 285883
This commit improves code completion for properties that are declared in
Objective-C protocols by making sure that properties show up in completions
when they are accessed through a qualified id.
rdar://24426041
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25436
llvm-svn: 284007
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
This commit fixes the IdentifierIterator to actually include identifiers
from a PCH or precompiled preamble when there is also a global module
index. This was causing code-completion (outside of C++) and
typo-correction to be missing global identifiers defined in the
PCH/preamble. Typo-correction has been broken since we first started
using the module index, whereas code-completion only started relying on
identifier iterator in r232793.
rdar://problem/25642879
llvm-svn: 268471
Currently we return no results when completing inside of the brackets in
a 'char foo[]' declaration. Let the generic expression completion code
handle it instead. We could get fancier here (e.g. filter non-constant
expressions in contexts where VLAs are not allowed), but it's a strict
improvement over the existing version.
llvm-svn: 261217
Otherwise the stale module cache data may cause the test to fail. These
two tests are new and are the only instances of c-index-test with
-fmodules that doesn't have an explicit module cache path.
llvm-svn: 242710
So, iterate over the list of macros mentioned in modules, and make sure those
are in the master table.
This isn't particularly efficient, but hopefully it's something that isn't
done too often.
PR23929 and rdar://problem/21480635
llvm-svn: 240571
Various tests had sprung up over the years which had --check-prefix=ABC on the
RUN line, but "CHECK-ABC:" later on. This happened to work before, but was
strictly incorrect. FileCheck is getting stricter soon though.
Patch by Ron Ofir.
llvm-svn: 188174
Summary: Passes all tests (+ the new one with code completion), but needs a thorough review in part related to modules.
Reviewers: doug.gregor
Reviewed By: alexfh
CC: cfe-commits, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D41
llvm-svn: 164610
attached to a declaration in the completion string.
Since extracting comments isn't free, a new code completion option is
introduced.
A new code completion option that enables including brief comments
into CodeCompletionString should be a, err, code completion option.
But because ASTUnit caches global declarations during parsing before
even completion consumer is created, the option is duplicated as a
translation unit option (in both libclang and ASTUnit, like the option
to cache code completion results).
llvm-svn: 159539
Specifically, @[] and @{} didn't have a type associated with them; we now
use "NSArray *" and "NSDictionary *", respectively. @"" has the type
"NSString *". @(), unfortunately, has type "id", since it (currently) may
be either an NSNumber or an NSString.
Add a test for all the Objective-C at-expression completions.
<rdar://problem/11507708&11507668&11507711>
llvm-svn: 158533
includes a patch from Matthias Kleine with a regression testcase!
Adds a new iterator 'data_iterator' to OnDiskHashTable which doesn't try to
reconstruct the external_key from the internal_key, which is useful for traits
that don't store enough information to do that mapping in their key. Also
deletes the 'item_iterator' from OnDiskHashTable as dead code.
llvm-svn: 154784
Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
RTTI is disabled. Similarly, don't suggest throw or try as code
completion results when C++ exceptions are disabled. Fixes
<rdar://problem/9193560>.
llvm-svn: 129346
That bug concerned the well-formedness of code such as (&ovl)(a, b,
c). GCC rejects the code, while EDG accepts it. On further study of the
standard, I see no support for EDG's position: in particular, C++
[over.over] does not list this as a context where we can take the
address of an overloaded function, C++ [over.call.func] does not
reference the address-of operator at any point, and C++ [expr.call]
claims that the function argument in a call is either a function
lvalue or a pointer-to-function; (&ovl) is neither.
llvm-svn: 118620
declaration send or a variadic function call, collapse the ", ..."
into the parameter before it, so that we don't get a second
placeholder.
llvm-svn: 112579
while we're completing in the middle of a function call), also produce
"ordinary" name results that show what can be typed at that point.
llvm-svn: 100558
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
the "typed" text, first, then take into account
nested-name-specifiers, name hiding, etc. This means that the
resulting sort is actually alphabetical :)
llvm-svn: 93370
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
definitions from a precompiled header. This ensures that
code-completion with macro names behaves the same with or without
precompiled headers.
llvm-svn: 92497
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
specializations and class template partial specializations (they're
never named directly). Also, member access expressions only refer to
value declarations (fields, functions, enumerators, etc.) and
Objective-C property declarations; filter out everything else.
llvm-svn: 91133
declaration by providing patterns for "getter = <method>" and "setter
= <method>". As part of this, invented a new "pattern" result kind
that is merely a semantic string. The "pattern" result kind should
help with other kinds of code templates.
llvm-svn: 89277
code to find and add Objective-C methods (starting at an
ObjCContainerDecl) into a single, static function. Also, make sure
that we search into the implementations of classes and categories to
find even more methods.
llvm-svn: 89163
- Introduce more code-completion string "chunk" kinds that describe
symbols, the actual text that the user is expected to type, etc.
- Make the generation of macro results optional, since it can be
slow
- Make code-completion accessible through the C API, marshalling the
code-completion results through a temporary file (ick) to maintain
process separation.
The last doesn't have tests yet.
llvm-svn: 86306
lookup in a member access expression always start a
nested-name-specifier. Additionally, rank names that start
nested-name-specifiers after other names.
llvm-svn: 82663
that there is one more argument (the one following the comma) and make
the candidate non-viable if the function cannot accept any argument in
that position.
llvm-svn: 82625
results for other, textual completion. For call completion, we now
produce enough information to show the function call argument that we
are currently on.
llvm-svn: 82592
members found in base classes have the same ranking as members found
in derived classes. However, we will introduce an informative note for
members found in base classes, showing (as a nested-name-specifier)
the qualification to name the base class, to make it clear which
members are from bases.
llvm-svn: 82586
-code-completion-at=filename:line:column
which performs code completion at the specified location by truncating
the file at that position and enabling code completion. This approach
makes it possible to run multiple tests from a single test file, and
gives a more natural command-line interface.
llvm-svn: 82571
opening parentheses and after each comma. We gather the set of visible
overloaded functions, perform "partial" overloading based on the set
of arguments that we have thus far, and return the still-viable
results sorted by the likelihood that they will be the best candidate.
Most of the changes in this patch are a refactoring of the overloading
routines for a function call, since we needed to separate out the
notion of building an overload set (common to code-completion and
normal semantic analysis) and then what to do with that overload
set. As part of this change, I've pushed explicit template arguments
into a few more subroutines.
There is still much more work to do in this area. Function templates
won't be handled well (unless we happen to deduce all of the template
arguments before we hit the completion point), nor will overloaded
function-call operators or calls to member functions.
llvm-svn: 82549
a nested-name-specifier that describes how to refer to that name. For
example, given:
struct Base { int member; };
struct Derived : Base { int member; };
the code-completion result for a member access into "Derived" will
provide both "member" to refer to Derived::member (no qualification needed) and
"Base::member" to refer to Base::member (qualification included).
llvm-svn: 82476
enumerators when either the user intentionally wrote a qualified name
(in which case we just use that nested-name-specifier to match
the user's code) or when this is the first "case" statement and we
need a qualified name to refer to an enumerator in a different scope.
llvm-svn: 82474
"->", or "::" if we will be looking into a dependent context. It's not
wrong to use the "template" keyword, but it's to needed, either.
llvm-svn: 82307
template smarter, by taking into account which function template
parameters are deducible from the call arguments. For example,
template<typename RandomAccessIterator>
void sort(RandomAccessIterator first, RandomAccessIterator last);
will have a code-completion string like
sort({RandomAccessIterator first}, {RandomAccessIterator last})
since the template argument for its template parameter is
deducible. On the other hand,
template<class X, class Y>
X* dyn_cast(Y *Val);
will have a code-completion string like
dyn_cast<{class X}>({Y *Val})
since the template type parameter X is not deducible from the function
call.
llvm-svn: 82306
- after "using", show anything that can be a nested-name-specifier.
- after "using namespace", show any visible namespaces or namespace aliases
- after "namespace", show any namespace definitions in the current scope
- after "namespace identifier = ", show any visible namespaces or
namespace aliases
llvm-svn: 82251
look into the current scope for anything that could start a
nested-names-specifier. These results are ranked worse than any of the
results actually found in the lexical scope.
Perform a little more pruning of the result set, eliminating
constructors, __va_list_tag, and any duplication of declarations in
the result set. For the latter, implemented
NamespaceDecl::getCanonicalDecl.
llvm-svn: 82231
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
essence, code completion is triggered by a magic "code completion"
token produced by the lexer [*], which the parser recognizes at
certain points in the grammar. The parser then calls into the Action
object with the appropriate CodeCompletionXXX action.
Sema implements the CodeCompletionXXX callbacks by performing minimal
translation, then forwarding them to a CodeCompletionConsumer
subclass, which uses the results of semantic analysis to provide
code-completion results. At present, only a single, "printing" code
completion consumer is available, for regression testing and
debugging. However, the design is meant to permit other
code-completion consumers.
This initial commit contains two code-completion actions: one for
member access, e.g., "x." or "p->", and one for
nested-name-specifiers, e.g., "std::". More code-completion actions
will follow, along with improved gathering of code-completion results
for the various contexts.
[*] In the current -code-completion-dump testing/debugging mode, the
file is truncated at the completion point and EOF is translated into
"code completion".
llvm-svn: 82166
Argyrios Kyrtzidis