For multithreaded modules (i.e. modules with a shared memory), lld injects a
synthetic Wasm start function that is automatically called during instantiation
to initialize memory from passive data segments. Even though the module will be
instantiated separately on each thread, memory initialization should happen only
once. Furthermore, memory initialization should be finished by the time each
thread finishes instantiation. Since multiple threads may be instantiating their
modules at the same time, the synthetic function must synchronize them.
The current synchronization tries to atomically increment a flag from 0 to 1 in
memory then enters one of two cases. First, if the increment was successful, the
current thread is responsible for initializing memory. It does so, increments
the flag to 2 to signify that memory has been initialized, then notifies all
threads waiting on the flag. Otherwise, the thread atomically waits on the flag
with an expected value of 1 until memory has been initialized. Either the
initializer thread finishes initializing memory (i.e. sets the flag to 2) first
and the waiter threads do not end up blocking, or the waiter threads succesfully
start waiting before memory is initialized so they will be woken by the
initializer thread once it has finished.
One complication with this scheme is that there are various contexts on the Web,
most notably on the main browser thread, that cannot successfully execute a
wait. Executing a wait in these contexts causes a trap, and in this case would
cause instantiation to fail. The embedder must therefore ensure that these
contexts win the race and become responsible for initializing memory, since that
is the only code path that does not execute a wait.
Unfortunately, since only one thread can win the race and initialize memory,
this scheme makes it impossible to have multiple threads in contexts that cannot
wait. For example, it is not currently possible to instantiate the module on
both the main browser thread as well as in an AudioWorklet. To loosen this
restriction, this commit inserts an extra check so that the wait will not be
executed at all when memory has already been initialized, i.e. when the flag
value is 2. After this change, the module can be instantiated on threads in
non-waiting contexts as long as the embedder can guarantee either that the
thread will win the race and initialize memory (as before) or that memory has
already been initialized when instantiation begins. Threads in contexts that can
wait can continue racing to initialize memory.
Fixes (or at least improves) PR51702.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109722
Remove some unnecessary logging from wasm-ld when running under
`--verbose`. Unlike `-debug` this logging is available in release
builds. This change makes it little more minimal/readable.
Also, avoid compiling the `debugWrite` function in releaase builds
where it does nothing. This should remove a lot debug strings from
the binary, and avoid having to construct unused debug strings at
runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109583
In the case that TLS is used in the single-threaded program, and
therefore effectively lowered away, we still optionally create a
`__tls_base` symbols, but the code for setting it was assuming it was
always created.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109518
llvm::errs() is unbuffered. On a POSIX platform, composing a diagnostic
string may invoke the ::write syscall multiple times, which can be slow.
Buffer writes to a temporary SmallString when composing a single diagnostic to
reduce the number of ::write syscalls to one (also easier to read under
strace/truss).
For an invocation of ld.lld with 62000+ lines of
`ld.lld: warning: symbol ordering file: no such symbol: ` warnings (D87121),
the buffering decreases the write time from 1s to 0.4s (for /dev/tty) and
from 0.4s to 0.1s (for a tmpfs file). This can speed up
`relocation R_X86_64_PC32 out of range` diagnostic printing as well
with `--noinhibit-exec --no-fatal-warnings`.
Reviewed By: jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87272
Failing to do so results in `std::bad_function_call` being
thrown when a pass tries to emit a diagnostic.
I've copied the relevant test over from LLD-ELF's test suite.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thevinster
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109274
We end up calling resolveBranchVA(), which asserts for Undefineds.
As fix, just return early in Writer::run() if there are any diagnostics
after processing relocations (which is where undefined symbol errors are
emitted). This matches what the ELF port does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109079
Fixes PR51578 in practice.
Currently there's only enough room for a single thunk, which for real-life code
isn't enough. The error case only happens when there are many branch statements
very close to each other (0 or 1 instructions apart), with the function at the
finalization barrier small.
There's a FIXME on what to do if we hit this case, but that suggestion sounds
complicated to me (see end of PR51578 comment 5 for why).
Instead, just leave more room for thunks. Chromium's unit_tests links fine with
room for 3 thunks. Leave room for 100, which should fix this for most cases in
practice.
There's little cost for leaving lots of room: This slop value only determines
when we finalize sections, and we insert thunks for forward jumps into
unfinalized sections. So leaving room means we'll need a few more thunks, but
the thunk jump range is 128 MiB while a single thunk is just 12 bytes.
For Chromium's unit_tests:
With a slop of 3: thunk calls = 355418, thunks = 10903
With a slop of 100: thunk calls = 355426, thunks = 10904
Chances are 100 is enough for all use cases we'll hit in practice, but even
bumping it to 1000 would probably be fine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108930
- Move a few variables closer to their uses, remove some completely
(no behavior change)
- Add some comments
- Make maxPotentialThunks include calls to stubs. It's possible that
an earlier call to a stub late in the stub table will need a thunk,
and that inserted thunk could push a stub earlier in the stub table
out of range. This is unlikely to happen, but usually there are
way fewer stub calls than non-stub calls, so if we're doing a
conservative approximation here we might as well do it correctly.
(For chromium's unit_tests target, 134421/242639 stub calls are
direct calls without this change, compared to 134408/242639 with
this change)
No real, meaningful behavior difference.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108924
- Don't subtract thunkSize from branchRange. Most places care about
the actual maximal branch range. Subtract thunkSize in the one place
that wants to leave room for a thunk.
- Set it to 0x800_0000 instead of 0xFF_FFFF
- Subtract 4 for the positive branch direction since it's a
two's complement 24bit number sign-extended mutiplied by 4,
so its range is -0x800_0000..+0x7FF_FFFC
- Make boundary checks include the boundary values
This doesn't make a huge difference in practice. It's preparation
for a "real" fix for PR51578 -- but it also lets the repro in comment 0
in that bug place one more thunk before hitting the TODO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108897
The assert is harmless and thinks worked fine in builds with asserts enabled,
but it's still nice to fix the assert.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108853
We currently complain "could not open /LTCG: no such file or directory",
which isn't very useful. We could emit a warning when we see this flag, but
just ignoring it seems fine.
Final missing part of PR38799.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108799
This is what ld64 does. Deviating in behavior here can result
in some subtle duplicate symbol errors, as detailed in the objc.s test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108781
The previous logic was duplicated between symbol-initiated
archive loads versus flag-initiated loads (i.e. `-force_load` and
`-ObjC`). This resulted in code duplication as well as redundant work --
we would create Archive instances twice whenever we had one of those
flags; once in `getArchiveMembers` and again when we constructed the
ArchiveFile.
This was motivated by an upcoming diff where we load archive members
containing ObjC-related symbols before loading those containing
ObjC-related sections, as well as before performing symbol resolution.
Without this refactor, it would be difficult to do that while avoiding
loading the same archive member twice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108780
This was missed by {D107035}. This fix addresses the following warning:
loop variable 'personality' has type 'const uint32_t &' (aka 'const unsigned int &') but is initialized with type 'const unsigned long long' resulting in a copy [-Wrange-loop-analysis]
In addition to fixing the size, I also removed the const reference,
since there's no performance benefit to avoiding copies of integer-sized
values.
If multiple /manifestdependency: flags are passed, they are
naively deduped, but after that each of them should have an
effect, instead of just the last one.
Also, /manifestdependency: flags are allowed in .drectve sections
(from `#pragma comment(linker, ...`). To make the interaction between
/manifestdependency: flags enabling manifest by default but
/manifest:no overriding this work, add an explict ManifestKind::Default
state to represent no explicit /manifest flag being passed.
To make /manifestdependency: flags from input file .drectve sections
work with /manifest:embed, delay embedded manifest emission until
after input files have been read.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108628
This CL is small, but the description can be a little long because I'm
trying to sum up the status quo for Emscripten/Wasm EH/SjLj options.
First, this CL adds an option for Wasm SjLj (`-wasm-enable-sjlj`), which
handles SjLj using Wasm EH. The implementation for this will be added as
a followup CL, but this adds the option first to do error checking.
This also adds an option for Wasm EH (`-wasm-enable-eh`), which has been
already implemented. Before we used `-exception-model=wasm` as the same
meaning as enabling Wasm EH, but after we add Wasm SjLj, it will be
possible to use Wasm EH instructions for Wasm SjLj while not enabling
EH, so going forward, to use Wasm EH, `opt` and `llc` will need this
option. This only affects `opt` and `llc` command lines and does not
affect Emscripten user interface.
Now we have two modes of EH (Emscripten/Wasm) and also two modes of SjLj
(also Emscripten/Wasm). The options corresponding to each of are:
- Emscripten EH: `-enable-emscripten-cxx-exceptions`
- Emscripten SjLj: `-enable-emscripten-sjlj`
- Wasm EH: `-wasm-enable-eh -exception-model=wasm`
`-mattr=+exception-handling`
- Wasm SjLj: `-wasm-enable-sjlj -exception-model=wasm`
`-mattr=+exception-handling`
The reason Wasm EH/SjLj's options are a little complicated are
`-exception-model` and `-mattr` are common LLVM options ane not under
our control. (`-mattr` can be omitted if it is embedded within the
bitcode file.)
And we have the following rules of the option composition:
- Emscripten EH and Wasm EH cannot be turned on at the same itme
- Emscripten SjLj and Wasm SjLj cannot be turned on at the same time
- Wasm SjLj should be used with Wasm EH
Which means we now allow these combinations:
- Emscripten EH + Emscripten SjLj: the current default in `emcc`
- Wasm EH + Emscripten SjLj:
This is allowed, but only as an interim step in which we are testing
Wasm EH but not yet have a working implementation of Wasm SjLj. This
will error out (D107687) in compile time if `setjmp` is called in a
function in which Wasm exception is used.
- Wasm EH + Wasm SjLj:
This will be the default mode later when using Wasm EH. Currently Wasm
SjLj implementation doesn't exist, so it doesn't work.
- Emscripten EH + Wasm SjLj will not work.
This CL moves these error checking routines to
`WebAssemblyPassConfig::addIRPasses`. Not sure if this is an ideal place
to do this, but I couldn't find elsewhere. Currently some checking is
done within LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj, but these checks only run if
LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj runs so it may not run when Wasm EH is used. This
moves that to `addIRPasses` and adds some more checks.
Currently LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass is responsible for Emscripten EH
and Emscripten SjLj. Wasm EH transformations are done in multiple
places, including WasmEHPrepare, LateEHPrepare, and CFGStackify. But in
the followup CL, LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass will be also responsible for
a part of Wasm SjLj transformation, because WasmSjLj will also be using
several Emscripten library functions, and we will be sharing more than
half of the transformation to do that between Emscripten SjLj and Wasm
SjLj.
Currently we have `-enable-emscripten-cxx-exceptions` and
`-enable-emscripten-sjlj` but these only work for `llc`, because for
`llc` we feed these options to the pass but when we run the pass using
`opt` the pass will be created with no options and the default options
will be used, which turns both Emscripten EH and Emscripten SjLj on.
Now we have one more SjLj option to care for, LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass
needs a finer way to control these options. This CL removes those
default parameters and make LowerEmscriptenEHSjLj pass read directly
from command line options specified. So if we only run
`opt -wasm-lower-em-ehsjlj`, currently both Emscripten EH and Emscripten
SjLj will run, but with this CL, none will run unless we additionally
pass `-enable-emscripten-cxx-exceptions` or `-enable-emscripten-sjlj`,
or both. This does not affect users; this only affects our `opt` tests
because `emcc` will not call either `opt` or `llc`. As a result of this,
our existing Emscripten EH/SjLj tests gained one or both of those
options in their `RUN` lines.
Reviewed By: dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107685
In the case of weakly defined symbols in shared libraries we now
generate both an import and an export. The dynamic linker can then
choose how a winner from among all the shared libraries that define a
given symbol.
Previously any direct usage of a weakly defined symbol would use the
DSO-local definition (For example, even through there would be single
address for a weakly defined function, each DSO could end up directly
calling its local version).
Fixes: https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/13773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108413
In PIC mode we import function address via `GOT.mem` imports but for
direct function calls we still import the first class function.
However, if the function is never directly called we can avoid the first
class import completely.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108345
The convention is not to check the prefix before `error: `.
This gives flexibility if we need to rename ld64.lld to something else,
(e.g. a while ago we used ld64.lld.darwinnew).
Address post follow up comment in D108016. Avoid creating isec for
LLVM segments since we are skipping over it.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108167
There was an instance of a third-party archive containing multiple
_llvm symbols from different files that clashed with each other
producing duplicate symbols. Symbols under the LLVM segment
don't seem to be producing any meaningful value, so just ignore them.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108016
In e72403f96d, we added the flag
"--no-dynamicbase" for disabling the dynamicbase flag which we set
by default. At the time, ld.bfd didn't have any corresponding
option (as ld.bfd defaulted to not setting the flag). Almost at
the same time, corresponding options were added to ld.bfd for
disabling it (while it was being enabled by default), with a
different name, "--disable-dynamicbase".
Thus add the "--disable-dynamicbase" option. Make this default
one advertised in the help listing, but keep the "--no-dynamicbase"
form as an alias. Also improve checking for the last option set
if there are multiple ones on the same command line.
Also add corresponding disable options for a lot of other flags
that we set by default, also added in ld.bfd in the same commit:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=514b4e191d5f46de8e142fe216e677a35fa9c4bb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107930
When enable CSPGO for ThinLTO, there are profile cfg mismatch warnings that will cause lld-link errors (with /WX)
due to source changes (e.g. `#if` code runs for profile generation but not for profile use)
To disable it we have to use an internal "/mllvm:-no-pgo-warn-mismatch" option.
In contrast clang uses option ”-Wno-backend-plugin“ to avoid such warnings and gcc has an explicit "-Wno-coverage-mismatch" option.
Add "lto-pgo-warn-mismatch" option to lld COFF/ELF to help turn on/off the profile mismatch warnings explicitly when build with ThinLTO and CSPGO.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104431
When enable CSPGO for ThinLTO, there are profile cfg mismatch warnings that will cause lld-link errors (with /WX).
To disable it we have to use an internal "/mllvm:-no-pgo-warn-mismatch" option.
In contrast clang uses option ”-Wno-backend-plugin“ to avoid such warnings and gcc has an explicit "-Wno-coverage-mismatch" option.
Add this "lto-pgo-warn-mismatch" option to lld to help turn on/off the profile mismatch warnings explicitly when build with ThinLTO and CSPGO.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104431
Now that we have https://reviews.llvm.org/D105539 we can
use objdump -d to actually check for instruction sequences
rather than binary blobs.
This is just an example of how to do that we should followup
with a wider ranging conversion of existing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106897
Clang diagnostics refer to identifier names in quotes.
This patch makes inline remarks conform to the convention.
New behavior:
```
% clang -O2 -Rpass=inline -Rpass-missed=inline -S a.c
a.c:4:25: remark: 'foo' inlined into 'bar' with (cost=-30, threshold=337) at callsite bar:0:25; [-Rpass=inline]
int bar(int a) { return foo(a); }
^
```
Reviewed By: hoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107791
This adds thin archives to the map file test.
I noticed that we had this test-case in our downstream
testsuite but it wasn't in the upstream testing.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107555
This patch enables compressed input sections on big-endian targets by
checking the target endianness and selecting an appropriate `Chdr`
structure.
Fixes PR51369
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107635
See: http://45.33.8.238/macm1/15677/step_10.txt
This is a test that has `REQUIRES: x86` which means it never ran
before; I don't have a MachO environment but based on the FileCheck
output it looks like it should be sufficient to remove one CHECK line.
Copy relocation on a non-default version symbol is unsupported and can crash at
runtime. Fortunately there is a one-line fix which works for most cases:
ensure `getSymbolsAt` unconditionally returns `ss`.
If two non-default version symbols are defined at the same place and both
are copy relocated, our implementation will copy relocated them into different
addresses. The pointer inequality is very unlikely an issue. In GNU ld, copy
relocating version aliases seems to create more pointer inequality problems than
us.
(
In glibc, sys_errlist@GLIBC_2.2.5 sys_errlist@GLIBC_2.3 sys_errlist@GLIBC_2.4
are defined at the same place, but it is unlikely they are all copy relocated in
one executable. Even if so, the variables are read-only and pointer inequality
should not be a problem.
)
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107535
Currently version script patterns are ignored for .symver produced
non-default version (single @) symbols. This makes such symbols
not localizable by `local:`, e.g.
```
.symver foo3_v1,foo3@v1
.globl foo_v1
foo3_v1:
ld.lld --version-script=a.ver -shared a.o
```
This patch adds the support:
* Move `config->versionDefinitions[VER_NDX_LOCAL].patterns` to `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].localPatterns`
* Rename `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].patterns` to `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].nonLocalPatterns`
* Allow `findAllByVersion` to find non-default version symbols when `includeNonDefault` is true. (Note: `symtab` keys do not have `@@`)
* Make each pattern check both the unversioned `pat.name` and the versioned `${pat.name}@${v.name}`
* `localPatterns` can localize `${pat.name}@${v.name}`. `nonLocalPatterns` can prevent localization by assigning `verdefIndex` (before `parseSymbolVersion`).
---
If a user notices new `undefined symbol` errors with a version script containing
`local: *;`, the issue is likely due to a missing `global:` pattern.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107234
Now that D95204 switched default to new Darwin backend, rename some CMake
targets to match.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107516
Remnant after D72803.
Distributions who want to customize the string can customize
LLD_VERSION_STRING instead.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, mstorsjo, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107416
Due to an assembler design flaw (IMO), `.symver foo,foo@v1` produces two symbols `foo` and `foo@v1` if `foo` is defined.
* `v1 {};` produces both `foo` and `foo@v1`, but GNU ld only produces `foo@v1`
* `v1 { foo; };` produces both `foo@@v1` and `foo@v1`, but GNU ld only produces `foo@v1`
* `v2 { foo; };` produces both `foo@@v2` and `foo@v1`, matching GNU ld. (Tested by symver.s)
This patch implements the GNU ld behavior by reusing the symbol redirection mechanism
in D92259. The new test symver-non-default.s checks the first two cases.
Without the patch, the second case will produce `foo@v1` and `foo@@v1` which
looks weird and makes foo unnecessarily default versioned.
Note: `.symver foo,foo@v1,remove` exists but the unfortunate `foo` will not go
away anytime soon.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107235
Currently version script patterns are ignored for .symver produced
non-default version (single @) symbols. This makes such symbols
not localizable by `local:`, e.g.
```
.symver foo3_v1,foo3@v1
.globl foo_v1
foo3_v1:
ld.lld --version-script=a.ver -shared a.o
# In a.out, foo3@v1 is incorrectly exported.
```
This patch adds the support:
* Move `config->versionDefinitions[VER_NDX_LOCAL].patterns` to `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].localPatterns`
* Rename `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].patterns` to `config->versionDefinitions[versionId].nonLocalPatterns`
* Allow `findAllByVersion` to find non-default version symbols when `includeNonDefault` is true. (Note: `symtab` keys do not have `@@`)
* Make each pattern check both the unversioned `pat.name` and the versioned `${pat.name}@${v.name}`
* `localPatterns` can localize `${pat.name}@${v.name}`. `nonLocalPatterns` can prevent localization by assigning `verdefIndex` (before `parseSymbolVersion`).
---
If a user notices new `undefined symbol` errors with a version script containing
`local: *;`, the issue is likely due to a missing `global:` pattern.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107234
GNU ld doesn't support multiple SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS output sections (it restores
the address after an SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS section, so consecutive SHF_TLS
SHT_NOBITS sections will have conflicting address ranges).
That said, `threadBssOffset` implements limited support for consecutive SHF_TLS
SHT_NOBITS sections. (SHF_TLS SHT_PROGBITS following a SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS can still be
incorrect.)
`.` in an output section description of an SHF_TLS SHT_NOBITS section is
incorrect. (https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2021-July/151974.html)
This patch saves the end address of the previous tbss section in
`ctx->tbssAddr`, changes `dot` in the beginning of `assignOffset` so
that `.` evaluation will be correct.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107208
This is available in GNU ld 2.35 and can be seen as a shortcut for multiple
--export-dynamic-symbol, or a --dynamic-list variant without the symbolic intention.
In the long term, this option probably should be preferred over --dynamic-list.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107317
This does the same fix as D107237 but for a couple more options,
converting all remaining cases of such options to accept both
forms, for consistency. This fixes building e.g. openldap, which
uses --image-base=<value>.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107253
This option is a subset of -Bsymbolic-functions. It applies to STB_GLOBAL
STT_FUNC definitions.
The address of a vague linkage function (STB_WEAK STT_FUNC, e.g. an inline
function, a template instantiation) seen by a -Bsymbolic-functions linked
shared object may be different from the address seen from outside the shared
object. Such cases are uncommon. (ELF/Mach-O programs may use
`-fvisibility-inlines-hidden` to break such pointer equality. On Windows,
correct dllexport and dllimport are needed to make pointer equality work.
Windows link.exe enables /OPT:ICF by default so different inline functions may
have the same address.)
```
// a.cc -> a.o -> a.so (-Bsymbolic-functions)
inline void f() {}
void *g() { return (void *)&f; }
// b.cc -> b.o -> exe
// The address is different!
inline void f() {}
```
-Bsymbolic-non-weak-functions is a safer (C++ conforming) subset of
-Bsymbolic-functions, which can make such programs work.
Implementations usually emit a vague linkage definition in a COMDAT group. We
could detect the group (with more code) but I feel that we should just check
STB_WEAK for simplicity. A weak definition will thus serve as an escape hatch
for rare cases when users want interposition on definitions.
GNU ld feature request: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27871
Longer write-up: https://maskray.me/blog/2021-05-16-elf-interposition-and-bsymbolic
If Linux distributions migrate to protected non-vague-linkage external linkage
functions by default, the linker option can still be handy because it allows
rapid experiment without recompilation. Protected function addresses currently
have deep issues in GNU ld.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102570
ld64 seems to handle common symbols in bitcode rather
bizarrely. They follow entirely different precedence rules from their
non-bitcode counterparts. I initially tried to emulate ld64 in D106597,
but I'm not sure the extra complexity is worth it, especially given that
common symbols are not, well, very common.
This diff accords common bitcode symbols the same precedence as regular
common symbols, just as we treat all other pairs of bitcode and
non-bitcode symbol types. The tests document ld64's behavior in detail,
just in case we want to revisit this.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107027
This is somewhat of a repeat of D66658 but for sections in PT_TLS
segments. Although such sections don't need to be aligned such that
address and offset are congruent modulo the page size, they do need
to be congruent modulo the segment alignment, otherwise the
whole PT_TLS will be unaligned. We therefore use the normal calculation
to determine the section's address within the PT_LOAD rather than
bailing out early due to being SHT_NOBITS.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106987
This is a similar problem to D66658, where we are too aggressive in not
aligning NOBITS sections, and the tests are based on the ones added for
that fix. If a .tbss section is first in a PT_TLS segment (i.e. there is
no .tdata section) then, although it doesn't need to be aligned such
that address and offset are congruent modulo the page size, they do need
to be congruent modulo the segment alignment, otherwise the whole PT_TLS
will be unaligned.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106986
This matches ld64's behavior, and makes it easier to fit LLD
into existing build systems.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107011
clang may place dynamic initializations for explicitly specialized class
template static data members in comdat.
Such in-comdat SHT_INIT_ARRAY was an abuse but we have to work around it for a while.
Change removeUnusedSyntheticSections() to actually remove empty
SyntheticSections in inputSections.
In addition to doing what removeUnusedSyntheticSections() was meant
to do, this will also make the shuffle-sections tests, which shuffles
inputSections, less sensitive to empty Synthetic Sections that
will not appear in the final image.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106427
Change-Id: I589eaf596472161a4395fb658aea0fad73318088
The test accidentally tested something else that makes lld fail
with a different (correct-looking) error that wasn't the one the
test tries to test for. (The test case before this change makes
ld64 hang in an infinite loop.)
Leave the name section in the output when using the --strip-debug
flag. This treats it more like ELF symbol tables, as the name
section has similar uses at runtime (e.g. wasm engines understand
it and it can be used for symbolization at runtime).
Fixes https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/issues/14623
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106728
These symbols are somewhat interesting in that they create non-existing
segments, which as far as I know is the only way to create segments
that don't contain any sections.
Final part of part of PR50760. Like D106629, but for segments instead
of sections. I'm not aware of anything that needs this in practice.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106767
Fixes the output segment name if both -rename_section and
-rename_segment are used and the post-section-rename segment
name is the same as the pre-segment-rename segment name to
match ld64's behavior.
The motivation is that segment$start$ can create section-less segments,
and this makes a corner case in the interaction between segment$start and
-rename_segment in the upcoming segment$start patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106766
__heap_base was not aligned. In practice, it will often be aligned
simply because it follows the stack, but when the stack is placed at the
beginning (with the --stack-first option), the __heap_base might be
unaligned. It could even be byte-aligned.
At least wasi-libc appears to expect that __heap_base is aligned:
659ff41456/dlmalloc/src/malloc.c (L5224)
While WebAssembly itself does not appear to require any alignment for
memory accesses, it is sometimes required when sharing a pointer
externally. For example, WASI might expect alignment up to 8:
https://github.com/WebAssembly/WASI/blob/main/phases/snapshot/docs.md#-timestamp-u64
This issue got introduced with the addition of the --stack-first flag:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46141
I suspect the lack of alignment wasn't intentional here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106499
With this, libclang_rt.profile_osx.a can be linked, that is coverage
and PGO-instrumented builds should now work with lld.
section$start and section$end symbols can create non-existing sections.
They're also undefined symbols that are only magic if there isn't a
regular symbol with their name, which means the need to be handled
in treatUndefined() instead of just looping over all existing
sections and adding start and end symbols like the ELF port does.
To represent the actual symbols, this uses absolute symbols that
get their value updated once an output section is layed out.
segment$start and segment$end are still missing for now, but they produce a
nicer error message after this patch.
Main part of PR50760.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106629
We lacked a test for bitcode symbol precedence. We assumed that
they followed the same rules as their regular symbol counterparts, but
never had a test to verify that we were matching ld64's behavior. It
turns out that we were largely correct, though we deviate from ld64 when
there are bitcode and non-bitcode symbols of the same name. The test
added in this diff both verifies our behavior and documents the
differences.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106596
We had a comment that claimed that defined symbols had priority
over common symbols if they occurred in the same archive. In fact, they
appear to have equal precedence. Our implementation already does this,
so I'm just updating the test comment. Also added a few other test
comments along the way for readability.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106595
In particular, relocations to absolute symbols or literal sections can
be handled in equalsConstant(), since their output addresses will not
change across each iteration of ICF. Offsets and addends can also be
dealt with entirely in equalsConstant(), making the code somewhat easier
to reason about. Only ConcatInputSections need to be handled in
equalsVariable().
LLD-ELF's implementation takes a similar approach.
Although this should make ICF do less work, in practice it seems like
there is no stat sig difference in time taken when linking
chromium_framework.
This refactor is motivated by an upcoming diff which improves ICF's handling of
addends.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106212
I found icf.s a bit hard to work with as it was not possible to
extend any of the functions `_a` ... `_k` to test new relocation /
referent types without modifying every single one of them. Additionally,
their one-letter names were not descriptive (though the comments
helped).
I've renamed all the functions to reflect the feature they are testing,
and shrunk them so that they contain just enough to test that one
feature.
I've also added tests for non-zero addends (via the
`_abs1a_ref_with_addend` and `_defined_ref_with_addend_1` functions).
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106211
segment$start$/segment$end$ symbols allow creating segments without
sections, so getting the segment address off the first section
won't work there. Storing the address on the segment is arguably a
bit simpler too.
No behavior change, part of PR50760.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106665
Thomas Lively