Summary: Update status page and test synopsis. Add synopsis in <cmath>.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80456
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
This implements the relaxed requirements on the std::array constructors of span,
where the type only needs to be convertible to the element type of the span.
Note that the previous tests were not sufficient, as the const array<T, n> constructor
was only tested for compile time and the array<T, N> only during runtime.
Restructure the tests so that we can test conversions as well as both constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75706
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
I am however not aware of the libc++ stand on the desired behaviour.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
Summary: The return type modification has already been implemented in rL364840 and rL365290.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc!
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70275
Summary:
This patch implements https://wg21.link/P0325.
Please mind that at it is my first contribution to libc++, so I may have forgotten to abide to some conventions.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, lichray
Reviewed By: ldionne, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, dexonsmith, zoecarver, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69882
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
This was previously committed as r372778 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 373092
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 372778
Summary: Completes P0357R3, which was merged into the C++20 Working Draft in San Diego.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54722
llvm-svn: 357423
Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.
Reviewed as https://reviews.llvm.org/D47344
new_delete_resource().allocate(n, a) has basically two permissible results:
* Return an appropriately sized and aligned block.
* Throw bad_alloc.
Before this patch, libc++'s new_delete_resource would do a third and impermissible thing, which was
to return an appropriately sized but inappropriately under-aligned block. This is now fixed.
(This came up while I was stress-testing unsynchronized_pool_resource on my MacBook. If we can't
trust the default resource to return appropriately aligned blocks, pretty much everything breaks.
For similar reasons, I would strongly support just patching __libcpp_allocate directly, but I don't
care to die on that hill, so I made this patch as a <memory_resource>-specific workaround.)
llvm-svn: 355763
Revert "[libc++] Fix <atomic> failures on GCC"
Revert "[libc++] Change memory_order to an enum class"
Revert "[libc++] decoupling Freestanding atomic<T> from libatomic.a"
The lldb formatter nededs to be updated. Shafik and Louis will
coordinate to do so.
llvm-svn: 355417
Louis Dionne