Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 398728732e [InstSimplify] add tests for undef + partial undef constant folding; NFC
These tests should probably go under a separate test file because they
should fold with just -constprop, but they're similar to the scalar
tests already in here.

llvm-svn: 348045
2018-11-30 22:51:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 4222716822 [InstSimplify] fp_binop X, undef --> NaN
The variable operand could be NaN, so it's always safe to propagate NaN.

llvm-svn: 327212
2018-03-10 16:51:28 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e5606b4fa5 [ConstantFold] fp_binop AnyConstant, undef --> NaN
With the updated LangRef ( D44216 / rL327138 ) in place, we can proceed with more constant folding.

I'm intentionally taking the conservative path here: no matter what the constant or the FMF, we can 
always fold to NaN. This is because the undef operand can be chosen as NaN, and in our simplified 
default FP env, nothing else happens - NaN just propagates to the result. If we find some way/need 
to propagate undef instead, that can be added subsequently.

The tests show that we always choose the same quiet NaN constant (0x7FF8000000000000 in IR text). 
There were suggestions to improve that with a 'NaN' string token or not always print a 64-bit hex 
value, but those are independent changes. We might also consider setting/propagating the payload of 
NaN constants as an enhancement.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44308

llvm-svn: 327208
2018-03-10 15:56:25 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 3675b8cece [InstSimplify] fix FP infinite hex constant values in tests; NFC
Really should improve this...

llvm-svn: 327144
2018-03-09 16:14:02 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 2ee7b9349d [ConstantFold] fp_binop undef, undef --> undef
These are uncontroversial and independent of a proposed LangRef edits (D44216).

I tried to fix tests that would fold away:
rL327004
rL327028
rL327030
rL327034

I'm not sure if the Reassociate tests are meaningless yet, but they probably will be 
as we add more folds, so if anyone has suggestions or wants to fix those, please do.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44258

llvm-svn: 327058
2018-03-08 20:42:49 +00:00
Sanjay Patel a87b74f72b [InstSimplify] add more tests for FP undef; NFC
llvm-svn: 327012
2018-03-08 15:39:39 +00:00
Sanjay Patel bf28a8fc01 [InstSimplify] add tests for FP with undef operand; NFC
Are any of these correct?

llvm-svn: 326241
2018-02-27 20:17:18 +00:00