Also use "unknown flag 'flag'" instead of "unknown flag: flag" for
consistency with the other ports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91970
This patch:
- adds an ld64.lld.darwinnew symlink for lld, to go with f2710d4b57,
so that `clang -fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` can be used to test new
Mach-O lld while it's in bring-up. (The expectation is that we'll
remove this again once new Mach-O lld is the defauld and only Mach-O
lld.)
- lets the clang driver know if the linker is lld (currently
only triggered if `-fuse-ld=lld` or `-fuse-ld=lld.darwinnew` is
passed). Currently only used for the next point, but could be used
to implement other features that need close coordination between
compiler and linker, e.g. having a diag for calling `clang++` instead
of `clang` when link errors are caused by a missing C++ stdlib.
- lets the clang driver pass `-demangle` to Mach-O lld (both old and
new), in addition to ld64
- implements -demangle for new Mach-O lld
- changes demangleItanium() to accept _Z, __Z, ___Z, ____Z prefixes
(and updates one test added in D68014). Mach-O has an extra
underscore for symbols, and the three (or, on Mach-O, four)
underscores are used for block names.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91884
This adds `--[no-]color-diagnostics[=auto,never,always]` to
the MachO port and harmonizes the flag in the other ports:
- Consistently use MetaVarName
- Consistently document the non-eq version as alias of the eq version
- Use B<> in the ports that have it (no-op, shorter)
- Fix oversight in COFF port that made the --no flag have the wrong
prefix
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91640
Just enough to consume some bitcode files and link them. There's more
to be done around the symbol resolution API and the LTO config, but I don't yet
understand what all the various LTO settings do...
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd, smeenai, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90663
We should have maxprot == initprot for all non-i386 architectures, which
is what ld64 does.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89420
Apple devtools use this to locate the dSYM files for a given
binary.
The UUID is computed based on an MD5 hash of the binary's contents. In order to
hash the contents, we must first write them, but LC_UUID itself must be part of
the written contents in order for all the offsets to be calculated correctly.
We resolve this circular paradox by first writing an LC_UUID with an all-zero
UUID, then updating the UUID with its real value later.
I'm not sure there's a good way to test that the value of the UUID is
"as expected", so I've just checked that it's present.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89418
Stub dylibs differ from "real" dylibs in that they lack any content in
their sections. What they do have are export tries and symbol tables,
which means we can still link against them. I am unclear how to
properly create these stub dylibs; XCode 11.3's `lipo` is able to create
stub dylibs, but those lack LC_ID_DYLIB load commands and are considered
invalid by most tooling. Newer versions of `lipo` aren't able to create
stub dylibs at all. However, recent SDKs in XCode still come with valid
stub dylibs, so it still seems worthwhile to support them. The YAML in
this diff's test was generated by taking a non-stub dylib and editing
the appropriate fields.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89012
They operate like Defined symbols but with no associated InputSection.
Note that `ld64` seems to treat the weak definition flag like a no-op for
absolute symbols, so I have replicated that behavior.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87909
Apparently this is used in real programs. I've handled this by reusing
the logic we already have for branch (function call) relocations.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87852
Not 100% sure but it appears that bundles are almost identical to
dylibs, aside from the fact that they do not contain `LC_ID_DYLIB`. ld64's code
seems to treat bundles and dylibs identically in most places.
Supporting bundles allows us to run e.g. XCTests, as all test suites are
compiled into bundles which get dynamically loaded by the `xctest` test runner.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87856
* Implement rebase opcodes. Rebase opcodes tell dyld where absolute
addresses have been encoded in the binary. If the binary is not loaded
at its preferred address, dyld has to rebase these addresses by adding
an offset to them.
* Support `-pie` and use it to test rebase opcodes.
This is necessary for absolute address references in dylibs, bundles etc
to work.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87199
In lit tests, we run each LLD invocation twice (LLD_IN_TEST=2), without shutting down the process in-between. This ensures a full cleanup is properly done between runs.
Only active for the COFF driver for now. Other drivers still use LLD_IN_TEST=1 which executes just one iteration with full cleanup, like before.
When the environment variable LLD_IN_TEST is unset, a shortcut is taken, only one iteration is executed, no cleanup for faster exit, like before.
A public API, lld::safeLldMain(), is also available when using LLD as a library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70378
* Move computation of systemLibraryRoots into a separate function, so we
can add more functionality to it without things becoming unwieldy
* Have `getSearchPaths` and related functions return by value instead of
by output parameter. NRVO should ensure that performance is unaffected.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87959
They cause their corresponding libraries / frameworks to be loaded via
`LC_LOAD_WEAK_DYLIB` instead of `LC_LOAD_DYLIB`.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87929
Handle the case where there are both common and non-common definitions
of the same symbol. Add a bunch of tests to ensure compatibility with ld64.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86910
On Unix, it is traditionally allowed to write variable definitions without
initialization expressions (such as "int foo;") to header files. These are
called tentative definitions.
The compiler creates common symbols when it sees tentative definitions. When
linking the final binary, if there are remaining common symbols after name
resolution is complete, the linker converts them to regular defined symbols in
a `__common` section.
This diff implements most of that functionality, though we do not yet handle
the case where there are both common and non-common definitions of the same
symbol.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86909
Remove all spurious `HelpHidden` flags from `lld/MachO/Options.td`. Add test for `HelpHidden` to `warnIfUnimplementedOption()` so that the empty `// handled elsewhere` case is unnecessary.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88160
The word "target" is overloaded, so lighten its load by using another word to denote the symbol or section to which a reloc points. While more stilted than "target", "referent" is rather less pompous than "designatum" or "denotatum". :P
Along the way, make a few neighboring variable names more descriptive.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, int3
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87584
Stifle the warning for unimplemented option `-dyamic`, since it is already the default. Add `Config::staticLink` and skeletal support for altering the flag, but otherwise leave the option `-static` as hidden and its warning in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88045
We didn't notice this earlier this we were only testing the export trie
encoded in a dylib, whose image base starts at zero. But a regular
executable contains `__PAGEZERO`, which means it has a non-zero image
base. This bug was discovered after attempting to run some programs that
performed `dlopen` on an executable.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87780
Digest the input `__LD,__compact_unwind` and produce the output `__TEXT,__unwind_info`. This is the initial commit with the major functionality.
Successor commits will add handling for ...
* `__TEXT,__eh_frame`
* personalities & LSDA
* `-r` pass-through
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86805
Found such a relocation while testing some real world programs.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86642
We can have GOT_LOAD relocations that reference `__dso_handle`.
However, our binding opcode encoder doesn't support binding to the DSOHandle
symbol. Instead of adding support for that, I decided it would be cleaner to
implement GOT_LOAD relaxation since `__dso_handle`'s location is always
statically known.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86641
These opcodes tell dyld to coalesce the overridden weak dysyms to this
particular symbol definition.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86575
Since there is no "weak lazy" lookup, function calls to weak symbols are
always non-lazily bound. We emit both regular non-lazy bindings as well
as weak bindings, in order that the weak bindings may overwrite the
non-lazy bindings if an appropriate symbol is found at runtime. However,
the bound addresses will still be written (non-lazily) into the
LazyPointerSection.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86573
Previously, we were only emitting regular bindings to weak
dynamic symbols; this diff adds support for the weak bindings too, which
can overwrite the regular bindings at runtime. We also treat weak
defined global symbols similarly -- since they can also be interposed at
runtime, they need to be treated as potentially dynamic symbols.
Note that weak bindings differ from regular bindings in that they do not
specify the dylib to do the lookup in (i.e. weak symbol lookup happens
in a flat namespace.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86572
Previously, the BindingEntry struct could only store bindings to offsets
within InputSections. Since the GOTSection and TLVPointerSections are
OutputSections, I handled those in a separate code path. However, this
makes it awkward to support weak bindings properly without code
duplication. This diff allows BindingEntries to point directly to
OutputSections, simplifying the upcoming weak binding implementation.
Along the way, I also converted a bunch of functions taking references
to symbols to take pointers instead. Given how much casting we do for
Symbol (especially in the upcoming weak binding diffs), it's cleaner
this way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86571
The re-exports list in a TAPI document can either refer to other inlined
TAPI documents, or to on-disk files (which may themselves be TBD or
regular files.) Similarly, the re-exports of a regular dylib can refer
to a TBD file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85404
Two things needed fixing for that to work:
1. getName() no longer returns null for DylibFiles constructed from TAPIs
2. markSubLibrary() now accepts .tbd as a possible extension
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86180
Nico Weber