Now that -mstack-probe-size is piped through to the backend via the function
attribute as on Windows x86, honour the value to permit handling of non-default
values for stack probes. This is needed /Gs with the clang-cl driver or
-mstack-probe-size with the clang driver when targeting Windows on ARM.
llvm-svn: 227667
This partially fixes PR13007 (ARM CodeGen fails with large stack
alignment): for ARM and Thumb2 targets, but not for Thumb1, as it
seems stack alignment for Thumb1 targets hasn't been supported at
all.
Producing an aligned stack pointer is done by zero-ing out the lower
bits of the stack pointer. The BIC instruction was used for this.
However, the immediate field of the BIC instruction only allows to
encode an immediate that can zero out up to a maximum of the 8 lower
bits. When a larger alignment is requested, a BIC instruction cannot
be used; llvm was silently producing incorrect code in this case.
This commit fixes code generation for large stack aligments by
using the BFC instruction instead, when the BFC instruction is
available. When not, it uses 2 instructions: a right shift,
followed by a left shift to zero out the lower bits.
The lowering of ARM::Int_eh_sjlj_dispatchsetup still has code
that unconditionally uses BIC to realign the stack pointer, so it
very likely has the same problem. However, I wasn't able to
produce a test case for that. This commit adds an assert so that
the compiler will fail the assert instead of silently generating
wrong code if this is ever reached.
llvm-svn: 225446
Debug info marks the first instruction without the FrameSetup flag
as being the end of the function prologue. Any CFI instructions in the
middle of the function prologue would cause debug info to end the prologue
too early and worse, attach the line number of the CFI instruction, which
incidentally is often 0.
llvm-svn: 224294
We use to track quite a few "adjusted" offsets through the FrameLowering code
to account for changes in the prologue instructions as we went and allow the
emission of correct CFA annotations. However, we were missing a couple of cases
and the code was almost impenetrable.
It's easier to just add any stack-adjusting instruction to a list and emit them
together.
llvm-svn: 222057
When we folded the DPR alignment gap into a push, we weren't noting the extra
distance from the beginning of the push to the FP, and so FP ended up pointing
at an incorrect offset.
The .cfi_def_cfa_offset directives are still wrong in this case, but I think
that can be improved by refactoring.
llvm-svn: 222056
We currently try to push an even number of registers to preserve 8-byte
alignment during a function's prologue, but only when the stack alignment is
prcisely 8. Many of the reasons for doing it apply also when that alignment > 8
(the extra store is often free, and can save another stack adjustment, though
less frequently for 16-byte stack alignment).
llvm-svn: 221321
We were making an attempt to do this by adding an extra callee-saved GPR (so
that there was an even number in the list), but when that failed we went ahead
and pushed anyway.
This had a couple of potential issues:
+ The .cfi directives we emit misplaced dN because they were based on
PrologEpilogInserter's calculation.
+ Unaligned stores can be less efficient.
+ Unaligned stores can actually fault (likely only an issue in niche cases,
but possible).
This adds a final explicit stack adjustment if all other options fail, so that
the actual locations of the registers match up with where they should be.
llvm-svn: 221320
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
Darwin prologues save their GPRs in two stages: a narrow push of r0-r7 & lr,
followed by a wide push of the remaining registers if there are any. AAPCS uses
a single push.w instruction.
It turns out that, on average, enough registers get pushed that code is smaller
in the AAPCS prologue, which is a nice property for M-class programmers. They
also have other options available for back-traces, so can hopefully deal with
the fact that FP & LR aren't adjacent in memory.
rdar://problem/15909583
llvm-svn: 209895
Mark up additional instructions which are part of the function prologue as
MachineFrameSetup. These instructions are part of the function prologue,
emitted by the PEI pass to setup the stack for use in the activating frame.
llvm-svn: 208153
The ARM::BLX instruction is an ARM mode instruction. The Windows on ARM target
is limited to Thumb instructions. Correctly use the thumb mode tBLXr
instruction. This would manifest as an errant write into the object file as the
instruction is 4-bytes in length rather than 2. The result would be a corrupted
object file that would eventually result in an executable that would crash at
runtime.
llvm-svn: 208152
remove it from the list of unspilled registers. Otherwise the following
attempt to keep the stack aligned by picking an extra GPR register to
spill will not work as it picks up r11.
llvm-svn: 208129
This fixes the memory leak introduced with the initial addition of support for
WoA stack probing. Now that the pseudo-instruction expansion can handle an
external symbol, use that to generate the load which simplifies the logic as
well as avoids the memory leak.
llvm-svn: 207737
This introduces the stack lowering emission of the stack probe function for
Windows on ARM. The stack on Windows on ARM is a dynamically paged stack where
any page allocation which crosses a page boundary of the following guard page
will cause a page fault. This page fault must be handled by the kernel to
ensure that the page is faulted in. If this does not occur and a write access
any memory beyond that, the page fault will go unserviced, resulting in an
abnormal program termination.
The watermark for the stack probe appears to be at 4080 bytes (for
accommodating the stack guard canaries and stack alignment) when SSP is
enabled. Otherwise, the stack probe is emitted on the page size boundary of
4096 bytes.
llvm-svn: 207615
When the list of VFP registers to be saved was non-contiguous (so multiple
vpush/vpop instructions were needed) these were being ordered oddly, as in:
vpush {d8, d9}
vpush {d11}
This led to the layout in memory being [d11, d8, d9] which is ugly and doesn't
match the CFI_INSTRUCTIONs we're generating either (so Dwarf info would be
broken).
This switches the order of vpush/vpop (in both prologue and epilogue,
obviously) so that the Dwarf locations are correct again.
rdar://problem/16264856
llvm-svn: 203655
The old system was fairly convoluted:
* A temporary label was created.
* A single PROLOG_LABEL was created with it.
* A few MCCFIInstructions were created with the same label.
The semantics were that the cfi instructions were mapped to the PROLOG_LABEL
via the temporary label. The output position was that of the PROLOG_LABEL.
The temporary label itself was used only for doing the mapping.
The new CFI_INSTRUCTION has a 1:1 mapping to MCCFIInstructions and points to
one by holding an index into the CFI instructions of this function.
I did consider removing MMI.getFrameInstructions completelly and having
CFI_INSTRUCTION own a MCCFIInstruction, but MCCFIInstructions have non
trivial constructors and destructors and are somewhat big, so the this setup
is probably better.
The net result is that we don't create temporary labels that are never used.
llvm-svn: 203204
The ARM backend has been using most of the MachO related subtarget
checks almost interchangeably, and since the only target it's had to
run on has been IOS (which is all three of MachO, Darwin and IOS) it's
worked out OK so far.
But we'd like to support embedded targets under the "*-*-none-macho"
triple, which means everything starts falling apart and inconsistent
behaviours emerge.
This patch should pick a reasonably sensible set of behaviours for the
new triple (and any others that come along, with luck). Some choices
were debatable (notably FP == r7 or r11), but we can revisit those
later when deficiencies become apparent.
llvm-svn: 198617
When trying to eliminate an "sub sp, sp, #N" instruction by folding
it into an existing push/pop using dummy registers, we need to account
for the fact that this might affect precisely how "fp" gets set in the
prologue.
We were attempting this, but assuming that *whenever* we performed a
fold it would make a difference. This is false, for example, in:
push {r4, r7, lr}
add fp, sp, #4
vpush {d8}
sub sp, sp, #8
we can fold the "sub" into the "vpush", forming "vpush {d7, d8}".
However, in that case the "add fp" instruction mustn't change, which
we were getting wrong before.
Should fix PR18160.
llvm-svn: 196725
We were trying to fold the stack adjustment into the wrong instruction in the
situation where the entire basic-block was epilogue code. Really, it can only
ever be valid to do the folding precisely where the "add sp, ..." would be
placed so there's no need for a separate iterator to track that.
Should fix PR18136.
llvm-svn: 196493
Previously, we clobbered callee-saved registers when folding an "add
sp, #N" into a "pop {rD, ...}" instruction. This change checks whether
a register we're going to add to the "pop" could actually be live
outside the function before doing so and should fix the issue.
This should fix PR18081.
llvm-svn: 196046
ARM prologues usually look like:
push {r7, lr}
sub sp, sp, #4
If code size is extremely important, this can be optimised to the single
instruction:
push {r6, r7, lr}
where we don't actually care about the contents of r6, but pushing it subtracts
4 from sp as a side effect.
This should implement such a conversion, predicated on the "minsize" function
attribute (-Oz) since I've yet to find any code it actually makes faster.
llvm-svn: 194264
ResolveFrameIndex had what appeared to be a very nasty hack for when the
frame-index referred to a callee-saved register. In this case it "adjusted" the
offset so that the address was correct if (and only if) the MachineInstr
immediately followed the respective push.
This "worked" for all forms of GPR & DPR but was only ever used to set the
frame pointer itself, and once this was put in a more sensible location the
entire state-tracking machinery it relied on became redundant. So I stripped
it.
The only wrinkle is that "add r7, sp, #0" might theoretically be slower (need
an actual ALU slot) compared to "mov r7, sp" so I added a micro-optimisation
that also makes emitARMRegUpdate and emitT2RegUpdate also work when NumBytes ==
0.
No test changes since there shouldn't be any functionality change.
llvm-svn: 194025
This function-attribute modifies the callee-saved register list and function
epilogue (specifically the return instruction) so that a routine is suitable
for use as an interrupt-handler of the specified type without disrupting
user-mode applications.
rdar://problem/14207019
llvm-svn: 191766
Introduction:
In case when stack alignment is 8 and GPRs parameter part size is not N*8:
we add padding to GPRs part, so part's last byte must be recovered at
address K*8-1.
We need to do it, since remained (stack) part of parameter starts from
address K*8, and we need to "attach" "GPRs head" without gaps to it:
Stack:
|---- 8 bytes block ----| |---- 8 bytes block ----| |---- 8 bytes...
[ [padding] [GPRs head] ] [ ------ Tail passed via stack ------ ...
FIX:
Note, once we added padding we need to correct *all* Arg offsets that are going
after padded one. That's why we need this fix: Arg offsets were never corrected
before this patch. See new test-cases included in patch.
We also don't need to insert padding for byval parameters that are stored in GPRs
only. We need pad only last byval parameter and only in case it outsides GPRs
and stack alignment = 8.
Though, stack area, allocated for recovered byval params, must satisfy
"Size mod 8 = 0" restriction.
This patch reduces stack usage for some cases:
We can reduce ArgRegsSaveArea since inner N*4 bytes sized byval params my be
"packed" with alignment 4 in some cases.
llvm-svn: 182237
1. VarArgStyleRegisters: functionality that emits "store" instructions for byval regs moved out into separated method "StoreByValRegs". Before this patch VarArgStyleRegisters had confused use-cases. It was used for both variadic functions and for regular functions with byval parameters. In last case it created new stack-frame and registered it as VarArg frame, that is wrong.
This patch replaces VarArgsStyleRegisters usage for byval parameters with StoreByValRegs method.
2. In ARMMachineFunctionInfo, "get/setVarArgsRegSaveSize" was renamed to "get/setArgRegsSaveSize". By the same reason. Sometimes it was used for variadic functions, and sometimes for byval parameters in regular functions. Actually, this property means the size of registers, that keeps arguments, and thats why it was renamed.
3. In ARMISelLowering.cpp, ARMTargetLowering class, in methods computeRegArea and StoreByValRegs, VARegXXXXXX was renamed to ArgRegsXXXXXX still by the same reasons.
llvm-svn: 180774
This patch lets the register scavenger make use of multiple spill slots in
order to guarantee that it will be able to provide multiple registers
simultaneously.
To support this, the RS's API has changed slightly: setScavengingFrameIndex /
getScavengingFrameIndex have been replaced by addScavengingFrameIndex /
isScavengingFrameIndex / getScavengingFrameIndices.
In forthcoming commits, the PowerPC backend will use this capability in order
to implement the spilling of condition registers, and some special-purpose
registers, without relying on r0 being reserved. In some cases, spilling these
registers requires two GPRs: one for addressing and one to hold the value being
transferred.
llvm-svn: 177774
This is a generic function (derived from PEI); moving it into
MachineFrameInfo eliminates a current redundancy between the ARM and AArch64
backends, and will allow it to be used by the PowerPC target code.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177111
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
This function is often used to decorate dangling instructions, so a
context reference is required to allocate memory for the operands.
Also add a corresponding MachineInstrBuilder method.
llvm-svn: 170797
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Saleem Abdulrasool