Clang has a hack to accept definitions of structs with tag names which
have the same name as intrinsics. However, this hack didn't guard
against annotation tokens showing up in the token stream.
llvm-svn: 224909
(__is_pod, __is_signed, etc.) to normal identifiers if they are
encountered in certain places in the grammar where we know that prior
versions of libstdc++ or libc++ use them, to still allow the use of
these keywords as type traits. Fixes <rdar://problem/9836262> and PR10184.
llvm-svn: 162937
as a keyword for the __is_signed type trait. Cope with this conflict
via some hackish recovery: if we see a declaration of the form
static const bool __is_signed
then we stop treating __is_signed as a keyword and instead treat it as
an identifier. It's ugly, but it's better than making the __is_signed
type trait conditional on some language flag. Fixes PR9804.
llvm-svn: 130399
<tr1/hashtable> header, where a friend class template
std::tr1::__detail::_Map_base is declared with the wrong template
parameters. GCC doesn't catch the problem, so Clang does a little
back-flip to avoid diagnosing just this one instance of the problem.
llvm-svn: 100790
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
The problem this change addresses is that we treat __is_pod and
__is_empty as keywords in C++, because they are built-in type traits
in GCC >= 4.3. However, GNU libstdc++ 4.2 (and possibly earlier
versions) define implementation-detail struct templates named __is_pod
and __is_empty.
This commit solves the problem by recognizing
struct __is_pod
and
struct __is_empty
as special token sequences. When one of these token sequences is
encountered, the keyword (__is_pod or __is_empty) is implicitly
downgraded to an identifier so that parsing can continue. This is an
egregious hack, but it has the virtue of "just working" whether
someone is using libstdc++ 4.2 or not, without the need for special
flags.
llvm-svn: 80988
David Majnemer