Given the following code:
```
void Foo(int);
void Baz()
{
Bar(sizeof int);
}
```
The error message which is printed today is this:
```
error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
```
There is no source location printed whatsoever, so fixing a compile break like this becomes extremely hard in a large codebase.
My change improves the error message. But it doesn't output a FixItHint because I wasn't able to figure out how to get the locations for left and right parens. So any tips would be appreciated.
```
<source>:7:6: error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
Bar(sizeof int);
^
```
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91129
PreferedType were not set when parsing compound literals, hence
designated initializers were not available as code completion suggestions.
This patch sets the preferedtype to parsed type for the following initializer
list.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/142.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92370
Reviewed by aaron.ballman, rsmith, wchilders
Highlights of review:
- avoid specifying an underlying type (unless such an enum is stored (or part of an abi?))
- avoid using enums as bit-fields, preferring unsigned bit-fields that we static_cast enumerators to. (MS's abi laysout enum bit-fields differently).
- clang-format, clang-format, clang-format.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D91035
Thank you!
Since these are scoped enumerators, they have to be prefixed by DeclaratorContext, so lets remove Context from the name, and return some characters to the multiverse.
Patch was reviewed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91011
Thank you to aaron, bruno, wyatt and barry for indulging me.
For example:
#define FOO(x) (x)
FOO({});
... forms a statement-expression after macro expansion. This warning
applies to '({' and '})' delimiting statement-expressions, '[[' and ']]'
delimiting attributes, and '::*' introducing a pointer-to-member.
The warning for forming these compound tokens across macro expansions
(or across files!) is enabled by default; the warning for whitespace
within the tokens is not, but is included in -Wall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86751
name annotation.
Instead, defer forming the member access expression or DeclRefExpr until
we build the use of ClassifyName's result. Just build an
UnresolvedLookupExpr to track the LookupResult until we're ready to
consume it.
This also reverts commit 2f7269b677 (other
than its testcase). That change was an attempted workaround for the same
problem.
instead of postfix-expressions, and improve error recovery for postfix
operators after unary-expressions.
This covers nullptr, __null, and some calls to type traits with special
parsing rules. We would previously not parse a postfix-expression suffix
for these expressions, so would reject expressions such as
__is_trivial(int)["foo"].
For the case where a postfix-expression suffix is *not* permitted after
a unary-expression (for example, after a new-expression or sizeof
expression), produce a diagnostic if one appears there anyway. That's
always ill-formed, but previously produced very bad diagnostics.
Summary:
This patch upstreams support for a new storage only bfloat16 C type.
This type is used to implement primitive support for bfloat16 data, in
line with the Bfloat16 extension of the Armv8.6-a architecture, as
detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
The bfloat type, and its properties are specified in the Arm Architecture
Reference Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/docs/ddi0487/latest/arm-architecture-reference-manual-armv8-for-armv8-a-architecture-profile
In detail this patch:
- introduces an opaque, storage-only C-type __bf16, which introduces a new bfloat IR type.
This is part of a patch series, starting with command-line and Bfloat16
assembly support. The subsequent patches will upstream intrinsics
support for BFloat16, followed by Matrix Multiplication and the
remaining Virtualization features of the armv8.6-a architecture.
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Luke Cheeseman
- Momchil Velikov
- Alexandros Lamprineas
- Luke Geeson
- Simon Tatham
- Ties Stuij
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, rjmccall, rsmith, liutianle, RKSimon, craig.topper, jfb, LukeGeeson, fpetrogalli
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: labrinea, majnemer, asmith, dexonsmith, kristof.beyls, arphaman, danielkiss, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76077
Summary:
Clang crashes when trying to finish function body. MaybeODRUseExprs is
not empty because of const static data member parsed in outer evaluation
context, upon call for isTypeIdInParens() function. It builds
annot_primary_expr, later parsed in ParseConstantExpression() in
inner constant expression evaluation context.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80925
This operator is intended for casting between
pointers to objects in different address spaces
and follows similar logic as const_cast in C++.
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60193
This reverts commit 61ba1481e2.
I'm reverting this because it breaks the lldb build with
incomplete switch coverage warnings. I would fix it forward,
but am not familiar enough with lldb to determine the correct
fix.
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:3958:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4633:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
^
lldb/source/Plugins/TypeSystem/Clang/TypeSystemClang.cpp:4889:11: error: enumeration values 'DependentExtInt' and 'ExtInt' not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]
switch (qual_type->getTypeClass()) {
Introduction/Motivation:
LLVM-IR supports integers of non-power-of-2 bitwidth, in the iN syntax.
Integers of non-power-of-two aren't particularly interesting or useful
on most hardware, so much so that no language in Clang has been
motivated to expose it before.
However, in the case of FPGA hardware normal integer types where the
full bitwidth isn't used, is extremely wasteful and has severe
performance/space concerns. Because of this, Intel has introduced this
functionality in the High Level Synthesis compiler[0]
under the name "Arbitrary Precision Integer" (ap_int for short). This
has been extremely useful and effective for our users, permitting them
to optimize their storage and operation space on an architecture where
both can be extremely expensive.
We are proposing upstreaming a more palatable version of this to the
community, in the form of this proposal and accompanying patch. We are
proposing the syntax _ExtInt(N). We intend to propose this to the WG14
committee[1], and the underscore-capital seems like the active direction
for a WG14 paper's acceptance. An alternative that Richard Smith
suggested on the initial review was __int(N), however we believe that
is much less acceptable by WG14. We considered _Int, however _Int is
used as an identifier in libstdc++ and there is no good way to fall
back to an identifier (since _Int(5) is indistinguishable from an
unnamed initializer of a template type named _Int).
[0]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/software/programmable/quartus-prime/hls-compiler.html)
[1]http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2472.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73967
Summary:
Clang performs expression based completion whenever it can't figure out
base of a member reference expression. It might be quite confusing in cases like
incomplete types. This patch disables that fallback.
Unfortunately `ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix` is quite tangled and this patch
adds more to it.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77570
Need to allow arrayshaping expression in a list of expressions, so use
ParseAssignmentExpression() when try to parse the base of the shaping
operation.
Summary:
Added basic representation and parsing/sema handling of array-shaping
operations. Array shaping expression is an expression of form ([s0]..[sn])base,
where s0, ..., sn must be a positive integer, base - a pointer. This
expression is a kind of cast operation that converts pointer expression
into an array-like kind of expression.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, jdoerfert
Subscribers: guansong, arphaman, cfe-commits, caomhin, kkwli0
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74144
Summary: Previously, we dropped the AST node for nonexistent member exprs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76764
In order to support non-user-named kernels, SYCL needs some way in the
integration headers to name the kernel object themselves. Initially, the
design considered just RTTI naming of the lambdas, this results in a
quite unstable situation in light of some device/host macros.
Additionally, this ends up needing to use RTTI, which is a burden on the
implementation and typically unsupported.
Instead, we've introduced a builtin, __builtin_unique_stable_name, which
takes a type or expression, and results in a constexpr constant
character array that uniquely represents the type (or type of the
expression) being passed to it.
The implementation accomplishes that simply by using a slightly modified
version of the Itanium Mangling. The one exception is when mangling
lambdas, instead of appending the index of the lambda in the function,
it appends the macro-expansion back-trace of the lambda itself in the
form LINE->COL[~LINE->COL...].
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76620
Normally clang avoids creating expressions when it encounters semantic
errors, even if the parser knows which expression to produce.
This works well for the compiler. However, this is not ideal for
source-level tools that have to deal with broken code, e.g. clangd is
not able to provide navigation features even for names that compiler
knows how to resolve.
The new RecoveryExpr aims to capture the minimal set of information
useful for the tools that need to deal with incorrect code:
source range of the expression being dropped,
subexpressions of the expression.
We aim to make constructing RecoveryExprs as simple as possible to
ensure writing code to avoid dropping expressions is easy.
Producing RecoveryExprs can result in new code paths being taken in the
frontend. In particular, clang can produce some new diagnostics now and
we aim to suppress bogus ones based on Expr::containsErrors.
We deliberately produce RecoveryExprs only in the parser for now to
minimize the code affected by this patch. Producing RecoveryExprs in
Sema potentially allows to preserve more information (e.g. type of an
expression), but also results in more code being affected. E.g.
SFINAE checks will have to take presence of RecoveryExprs into account.
Initial implementation only works in C++ mode, as it relies on compiler
postponing diagnostics on dependent expressions. C and ObjC often do not
do this, so they require more work to make sure we do not produce too
many bogus diagnostics on the new expressions.
See documentation of RecoveryExpr for more details.
original patch from Ilya
This change is based on https://reviews.llvm.org/D61722
Reviewers: sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: sammccall, rsmith
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69330
Suppress those diagnostics if lhs of a member expression contains
errors. Typo correction produces dependent expressions even in
non-template code, that led to spurious diagnostics before.
previous:
/tmp/t.cpp:6:17: error: use 'template' keyword to treat 'f' as a dependent template name
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^
template
/tmp/t.cpp:6:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bilder'; did you mean 'builder'?
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^~~~~~
builder
vs now:
/tmp/t.cpp:6:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'bilder'; did you mean 'builder'?
auto a = bilder.f<int>();
^~~~~~
builder
Original patch from Ilya.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65592
a dependent context.
This matches the GCC behavior.
We track the enclosing template depth when determining whether a
statement expression is within a dependent context; there doesn't appear
to be any other reliable way to determine this.
We previously assumed they were neither value- nor
instantiation-dependent under any circumstances, which would lead to
crashes and other misbehavior.
dependent contexts.
We previously assumed they were neither value- nor
instantiation-dependent under any circumstances, which would lead to
crashes and other misbehavior.
As per P1980R0, constraint expressions are unevaluated operands, and their constituent atomic
constraints only become constant evaluated during satisfaction checking.
Change the evaluation context during parsing and instantiation of constraints to unevaluated.
Summary:
CodeCompletion was not being triggered after successfully parsed
initializer lists, e.g.
```cpp
void foo(int, bool);
void bar() {
foo({1}^, false);
}
```
CodeCompletion would suggest the function foo as an overload candidate up until
the point marked with `^` but after that point we do not trigger signature help
since parsing succeeds.
This patch handles that case by failing in parsing expression lists whenever we
see a codecompletion token, in addition to getting an invalid subexpression.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73177
Implement support for C++2a requires-expressions.
Re-commit after compilation failure on some platforms due to alignment issues with PointerIntPair.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50360
A TemplateIdAnnotation represents only a template-id, not a
nested-name-specifier plus a template-id. Don't make a redundant copy of
the CXXScopeSpec and store it on the template-id annotation.
This slightly improves error recovery by more properly handling the case
where we would form an invalid CXXScopeSpec while parsing a typename
specifier, instead of accidentally putting the token stream into a
broken "annot_template_id with a scope specifier, but with no preceding
annot_cxxscope token" state.
Function trailing requires clauses now parsed, supported in overload resolution and when calling, referencing and taking the address of functions or function templates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is refe$
D41217 on Phabricator.
(recommit after fixing failing Parser test on windows)
llvm-svn: 374903
Part of C++20 Concepts implementation effort. Added Concept Specialization Expressions that are created when a concept is referenced with arguments, and tests thereof.
llvm-svn: 374882
Summary:
We don't know what context to use until the classification result is
consumed by the parser, which could happen in a different semantic
context. So don't build the expression that results from name
classification until we get to that point and can handle it properly.
This covers everything except C++ implicit class member access, which
is a little awkward to handle properly in the face of the protected
member access check. But it at least fixes all the currently-filed
instances of PR43080.
Reviewers: efriedma
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68896
llvm-svn: 374826
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368942
This commit adds a new builtin, __builtin_bit_cast(T, v), which performs a
bit_cast from a value v to a type T. This expression can be evaluated at
compile time under specific circumstances.
The compile time evaluation currently doesn't support bit-fields, but I'm
planning on fixing this in a follow up (some of the logic for figuring this out
is in CodeGen). I'm also planning follow-ups for supporting some more esoteric
types that the constexpr evaluator supports, as well as extending
__builtin_memcpy constexpr evaluation to use the same infrastructure.
rdar://44987528
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62825
llvm-svn: 364954
Summary:
By adding a hook to consume all tokens produced by the preprocessor.
The intention of this change is to make it possible to consume the
expanded tokens without re-runnig the preprocessor with minimal changes
to the preprocessor and minimal performance penalty when preprocessing
without recording the tokens.
The added hook is very low-level and reconstructing the expanded token
stream requires more work in the client code, the actual algorithm to
collect the tokens using this hook can be found in the follow-up change.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, nemanjai, kbarton, jsji, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59885
llvm-svn: 361007
Summary:
This patch implements the source location builtins `__builtin_LINE(), `__builtin_FUNCTION()`, `__builtin_FILE()` and `__builtin_COLUMN()`. These builtins are needed to implement [`std::experimental::source_location`](https://rawgit.com/cplusplus/fundamentals-ts/v2/main.html#reflection.src_loc.creation).
With the exception of `__builtin_COLUMN`, GCC also implements these builtins, and Clangs behavior is intended to match as closely as possible.
Reviewers: rsmith, joerg, aaron.ballman, bogner, majnemer, shafik, martong
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rnkovacs, loskutov, riccibruno, mgorny, kunitoki, alexr, majnemer, hfinkel, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37035
llvm-svn: 360937
We correct some typos in `ActOnArraySubscriptExpr` and
`ActOnOMPArraySectionExpr`, so when their result is `ExprError`, we can
end up correcting delayed typos in the same expressions again. In
general it is OK but when `NumTypos` is incorrect, we can hit the
assertion
> Assertion failed: (Entry != DelayedTypos.end() && "Failed to get the state for a TypoExpr!"), function getTypoExprState, file clang/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp, line 5219.
Fix by replacing some subscript `ExprResult` with typo-corrected expressions
instead of keeping the original expressions. Thus if original expressions
contained `TypoExpr`, we'll use corrected expressions instead of trying to
correct them again.
rdar://problem/47403222
Reviewers: rsmith, erik.pilkington, majnemer
Reviewed By: erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60848
llvm-svn: 359713
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
Shivanshu Goyal