[PPC64LE] ELFv2 ABI updates for the .opd section
The PPC64 Little Endian (PPC64LE) target supports the ELFv2 ABI, and as
such, does not have a ".opd" section. This is keyed off a _CALL_ELF=2
macro check.
The CALL_ELF check is not clearly documented at this time. The basis
for usage in this patch is from the gcc thread here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-11/msg01144.html
> Adding comment from Uli:
Looks good to me. I think the old-style JIT doesn't really work
anyway for 64-bit, but at least with this patch LLVM will compile
and link again on a ppc64le host ...
llvm-svn: 204614
The tests !defined(__ppc__) && !defined(__powerpc__) are not needed
or helpful when verifying that code is being compiled for a 64-bit
target. The simpler test provided by this revision is sufficient to
tell if the target is 64-bit.
llvm-svn: 187318
Both GCC and LLVM will implicitly define __ppc__ and __powerpc__ for
all PowerPC targets, whether 32- or 64-bit. They will both implicitly
define __ppc64__ and __powerpc64__ for 64-bit PowerPC targets, and not
for 32-bit targets. We cannot be sure that all other possible
compilers used to compile Clang/LLVM define both __ppc__ and
__powerpc__, for example, so it is best to check for both when relying
on either inside the Clang/LLVM code base.
This patch makes sure we always check for both variants. In addition,
it fixes one unnecessary check in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp.
(At least one of __ppc__ and __powerpc__ should always be defined when
compiling for a PowerPC target, no matter which compiler is used, so
testing for them is unnecessary.)
There are some places in the compiler that check for other variants,
like __POWERPC__ and _POWER, and I have left those in place. There is
no need to add them elsewhere. This seems to be in Apple-specific
code, and I won't take a chance on breaking it.
There is no intended change in behavior; thus, no test cases are
added.
llvm-svn: 187248
GCC warns about the attribute being ignored if it occurs after void*.
There seems to be some kind of incompatibility between clang and gcc here, but
I can't fathom who's right.
void* LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY foo(); // clang: hidden, gcc: default
LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY void *bar(); // clang: hidden, gcc: hidden
void LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY qux(); // clang: hidden, gcc: hidden
llvm-svn: 175394
blocks. We still don't have consensus if we should try to change clang or
the standard, but llvm should work with compilers that implement the current
standard and mangle those functions.
llvm-svn: 175267
Since functions with internal linkage don't have language linkage, it is valid
to overload them:
extern "C" {
static int foo();
static int foo(int);
}
So we mangle them.
llvm-svn: 175120
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
remove start/finishGVStub and the BufferState helper class from the
MachineCodeEmitter interface. It has the side-effect of not setting the
indirect global writable and then executable on ARM, but that shouldn't be
necessary.
llvm-svn: 91464
way for each TargetJITInfo subclass to allocate its own stubs. This
means stubs aren't as exactly-sized anymore, but it lets us get rid of
TargetJITInfo::emitFunctionStubAtAddr(), which lets ARM and PPC
support the eager JIT, fixing http://llvm.org/PR4816.
* Rename the JITEmitter's stub creation functions to describe the kind
of stub they create. So far, all of them create lazy-compilation
stubs, but they sometimes get used when far-call stubs are needed.
Fixing http://llvm.org/PR5201 will involve fixing this.
llvm-svn: 89715
This adds location info for all llvm_unreachable calls (which is a macro now) in
!NDEBUG builds.
In NDEBUG builds location info and the message is off (it only prints
"UREACHABLE executed").
llvm-svn: 75640
Make llvm_unreachable take an optional string, thus moving the cerr<< out of
line.
LLVM_UNREACHABLE is now a simple wrapper that makes the message go away for
NDEBUG builds.
llvm-svn: 75379
Make CalculateParameterAndLinkageAreaSize() Darwin-specific.
Remove SVR4 specific code from LowerCALL_Darwin() and LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS_Darwin().
Rename MachoABI to DarwinABI for consistency.
Rename ELF ABI to SVR4 ABI for consistency.
Factor out common call return lowering between the Darwin and SVR4 ABI.
Factor out common call lowering between the Darwin and SVR4 ABI.
llvm-svn: 74766
was actually passing a completely incorrect size to sys_icache_invalidate.
Instead of having the JITEmitter do this (which doesn't have the correct
size), just make the target sync its own stubs.
llvm-svn: 46354
which allows the code to be above the 2G marker. We still need to JIT emit
dyld stubs to support external, weak, common, etc globals, but that will
happen tomorrow.
llvm-svn: 32348
Will Schmidt