The bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue() mechanism contains a system of bug
reporter visitors that recursively call each other in order to track where a
null or undefined value came from, where each visitor represents a particular
tracking mechanism (track how the value was stored, track how the value was
returned from a function, track how the value was constrained to null, etc.).
Each visitor is only added once per value it needs to track. Almost. One
exception from this rule would be FindLastStoreBRVisitor that has two operation
modes: it contains a flag that indicates whether null stored values should be
suppressed. Two instances of FindLastStoreBRVisitor with different values of
this flag are considered to be different visitors, so they can be added twice
and produce the same diagnostic twice. This was indeed the case in the affected
test.
With the current logic of this whole machinery, such duplication seems
unavoidable. We should be able to safely add visitors with different flag
values without constructing duplicate diagnostic pieces. Hence the effort
in this commit to de-duplicate diagnostics regardless of what visitors
have produced them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41258
llvm-svn: 321135
When trying to figure out where a null or undefined value came from,
parentheses and cast expressions are either completely irrelevant, or,
in the case of lvalue-to-rvale cast, straightforwardly lead us in the right
direction when we remove them.
There is a regression that causes a certain diagnostic to appear twice in the
path-notes.cpp test (changed to FIXME). It would be addressed in the next
commit.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41254
llvm-svn: 321133
When reporting certain kinds of analyzer warnings, we use the
bugreporter::trackNullOrUndefValue mechanism, which is part of public checker
API, to understand where a zero, null-pointer, or garbage value came from,
which would highlight important events with respect to that value in the
diagnostic path notes, and help us suppress various false positives that result
from values appearing from particular sources.
Previously, we've lost track of the value when it was written into a memory
region that is not a plain variable. Now try to resume tracking in this
situation by finding where the last write to this region has occured.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41253
llvm-svn: 321130
Since C++17, classes that have base classes can potentially be initialized as
aggregates. Trying to construct such objects through brace initialization was
causing the analyzer to crash when the base class has a non-trivial constructor,
while figuring target region for the base class constructor, because the parent
stack frame didn't contain the constructor of the subclass, because there is
no constructor for subclass, merely aggregate initialization.
This patch avoids the crash, but doesn't provide the actually correct region
for the constructor, which still remains to be fixed. Instead, construction
goes into a fake temporary region which would be immediately discarded. Similar
extremely conservative approach is used for other cases in which the logic for
finding the target region is not yet implemented, including aggregate
initialization with fields instead of base-regions (which is not C++17-specific
but also never worked, just didn't crash).
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40841
rdar://problem/35441058
llvm-svn: 321128
OS instead of inferring it from SDK / environment
The OS version is specified in -target should be used instead of the one in an
environment variable / SDK name.
rdar://35813850
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40998
llvm-svn: 321099
The Clang option -foptimization-record-file= controls which file an
optimization record is output to. Optimization records are output if you
use the Clang option -fsave-optimization-record. If you specify the
first option without the second, you get a warning that the command line
argument was unused. Passing -foptimization-record-file= should imply
-fsave-optimization-record.
This fixes PR33670
Patch by: Dmitry Venikov <venikov@phystech.edu>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39834
llvm-svn: 321090
Summary: This is to be consistent with latest Movidius MDK releases.
Also, don't inherit any gcc paths for shave triple.
Reviewers: jyknight
Subscribers: emaste, fedor.sergeev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41295
llvm-svn: 321080
Fixes regression from r320533.
This fixes the undefined behavior, but I'm not sure it's really right...
I think we end up with missing coverage for code in modules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41374
llvm-svn: 321052
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320982
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,
so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when
that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the cfe part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320978
There are 2 parts to getting the -fassociative-math command-line flag translated to LLVM FMF:
1. In the driver/frontend, we accept the flag and its 'no' inverse and deal with the
interactions with other flags like -ffast-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math.
This was mostly already done - we just need to translate the flag as a codegen option.
The test file is complicated because there are many potential combinations of flags here.
Note that we are matching gcc's behavior that requires 'nsz' and no-trapping-math.
2. In codegen, we map the codegen option to FMF in the IR builder. This is simple code and
corresponding test.
For the motivating example from PR27372:
float foo(float a, float x) { return ((a + x) - x); }
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -ffast-math -fno-associative-math -emit-llvm | egrep 'fadd|fsub'
%add = fadd nnan ninf nsz arcp contract float %0, %1
%sub = fsub nnan ninf nsz arcp contract float %add, %2
So 'reassoc' is off as expected (and so is the new 'afn' but that's a different patch).
This case now works as expected end-to-end although the underlying logic is still wrong:
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -ffast-math -fno-associative-math | grep xmm
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
subss %xmm1, %xmm0
We're not done because the case where 'reassoc' is set is ignored by optimizer passes. Example:
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -fassociative-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -emit-llvm | grep fadd
%add = fadd reassoc float %0, %1
$ ./clang -O2 27372.c -S -o - -fassociative-math -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math | grep xmm
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
subss %xmm1, %xmm0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39812
llvm-svn: 320920
This mimics FileCheck's --check-prefixes option.
The default prefix is "expected". That is, "-verify" is equivalent to
"-verify=expected".
The goal is to permit exercising a single test suite source file with different
compiler options producing different sets of diagnostics. While cpp can be
combined with the existing -verify to accomplish the same goal, source is often
easier to maintain when it's not cluttered with preprocessor directives or
duplicate passages of code. For example, this patch also rewrites some existing
clang tests to demonstrate the benefit of this feature.
Patch by Joel E. Denny, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39694
llvm-svn: 320908
The frontend currently groups diagnostics from the command line according to
diagnostic level, but that places all notes last. Fix that by emitting such
diagnostics in the order they were generated.
Patch by Joel E. Denny, thanks!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40995
llvm-svn: 320904
This patch introduces a specialized way to lower overflow-checked
multiplications with mixed-sign operands. This fixes link failures and
ICEs on code like this:
void mul(int64_t a, uint64_t b) {
int64_t res;
__builtin_mul_overflow(a, b, &res);
}
The generic checked-binop irgen would use a 65-bit multiplication
intrinsic here, which requires runtime support for _muloti4 (128-bit
multiplication), and therefore fails to link on i386. To get an ICE
on x86_64, change the example to use __int128_t / __uint128_t.
Adding runtime and backend support for 65-bit or 129-bit checked
multiplication on all of our supported targets is infeasible.
This patch solves the problem by using simpler, specialized irgen for
the mixed-sign case.
llvm.org/PR34920, rdar://34963321
Testing: Apart from check-clang, I compared the output from this fairly
comprehensive test driver using unpatched & patched clangs:
https://gist.github.com/vedantk/3eb9c88f82e5c32f2e590555b4af5081
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41149
llvm-svn: 320902
This ensures that when compiling for "arm64" __is_target_arch will succeed for
both "arm64" and "aarch64".
Thanks to Bob Wilson who pointed this out!
llvm-svn: 320853
Previously the attributes were emitted only for function definitions.
Patch adds emission of the attributes for function declarations.
llvm-svn: 320826
Summary:
Revision D38639 needs this commit in order to properly make open
definition calls on include statements work.
Patch by William Enright.
Reviewers: malaperle, krasimir, bkramer, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: malaperle, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits, arphaman, ilya-biryukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39375
llvm-svn: 320804
The initializeLocal function of UnaryTransformTypeLoc missed
the UnderlyingTInfo member. This caused a null-dereference
issue, as reported in PR23421. This patch correctly initializss
the UnderlyingTInfo.
llvm-svn: 320765
Summary:
In D41064, I proposed adding `#pragma clang diagnostic ignored
"-Wuser-defined-literals"` to some of libc++'s headers, since these
warnings are now triggered by clang's new `-std=gnu++14` default:
```
$ cat test.cpp
#include <string>
$ clang -std=c++14 -Wsystem-headers -Wall -Wextra -c test.cpp
In file included from test.cpp:1:
In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/string:470:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:763:29: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char> operator "" sv(const char *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:769:32: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<wchar_t> operator "" sv(const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:775:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char16_t> operator "" sv(const char16_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string_view:781:33: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string_view<char32_t> operator "" sv(const char32_t *__str, size_t __len)
^
In file included from test.cpp:1:
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4012:24: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char> operator "" s( const char *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4018:27: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<wchar_t> operator "" s( const wchar_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4024:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char16_t> operator "" s( const char16_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
/usr/include/c++/v1/string:4030:28: warning: user-defined literal suffixes not starting with '_' are reserved [-Wuser-defined-literals]
basic_string<char32_t> operator "" s( const char32_t *__str, size_t __len )
^
8 warnings generated.
```
Both @aaron.ballman and @mclow.lists felt that adding this workaround to
the libc++ headers was the wrong way, and it should be fixed in clang
instead.
Here is a proposal to do just that. I verified that this suppresses the
warning, even when -Wsystem-headers is used, and that the warning is
still emitted for a declaration outside of system headers.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, mclow.lists, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mclow.lists, aaron.ballman, andrew, emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41080
llvm-svn: 320755
There are many more expr types that can be a capability expr, like
CXXThisExpr, CallExpr, MemberExpr. Instead of enumerating all of them,
just check typeHasCapability for any type given.
Also add & and * operators to allowed unary operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41224
llvm-svn: 320753
Most of the -Wsign-compare warnings are due to the fact that
enums are signed by default in the MS ABI, while the
tautological comparison warnings trigger on x86 builds where
sizeof(size_t) is 4 bytes, so N > numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()
is always false.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41256
llvm-svn: 320750
This reverts commit 37e69667f748e1458b46483b7c1b8f9ba33eec44.
We're going to discuss its ramifications further before making a
conclusion.
llvm-svn: 320747
builtin macros
This patch implements the __is_target_arch, __is_target_vendor, __is_target_os,
and __is_target_environment Clang preprocessor extensions that were proposed by
@compnerd in Bob's cfe-dev post:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-November/056166.html.
These macros can be used to examine the components of the target triple at
compile time. A has_builtin(is_target_???) preprocessor check can be used to
check for their availability.
__is_target_arch allows you to check if an arch is specified without worring
about a specific subarch, e.g.
__is_target_arch(arm) returns 1 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_arch(armv7) returns 1 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_arch(armv6) returns 0 for the target arch "armv7"
__is_target_vendor and __is_target_environment match the specific vendor
or environment. __is_target_os matches the specific OS, but
__is_target_os(darwin) will match any Darwin-based OS. "Unknown" can be used
to test if the triple's component is specified.
rdar://35753116
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41087
llvm-svn: 320734
Summary:
InterlockedCompareExchange128 is a bit more complicated than the other
InterlockedCompareExchange functions, so it requires a bit more work. It
doesn't directly refer to 128bit ints, instead it takes pointers to
64bit ints for Destination and ComparandResult, and exchange is taken as
two 64bit ints (high & low). The previous value is written to
ComparandResult, and success is returned. This implementation does the
following in order to produce a cmpxchg instruction:
1. Cast everything to 128bit ints or int pointers, and glues together
the Exchange values
2. Reads from CompareandResult to get the comparand
3. Calls cmpxchg volatile (on X86 this will produce a lock cmpxchg16b
instruction)
1. Result 0 (previous value) is written back to ComparandResult
2. Result 1 (success bool) is zext'ed to a uchar and returned
Resolves bug https://llvm.org/PR35251
Patch by Colden Cullen!
Reviewers: rnk, agutowski
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: majnemer, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41032
llvm-svn: 320730
Summary:
If we write the following code, it goes over 100 columns, so we need to wrap it:
```
- (VeryLongReturnTypeName)veryLongMethodParameter:(VeryLongParameterName)thisIsAVeryLongParameterName
longMethodParameter:(LongParameterName)thisIsAlsoAnotherLongParameterName;
```
Currently, clang-format with the google style aligns the method parameter names on the first column:
```
- (VeryLongReturnTypeName)
veryLongMethodParameter:(VeryLongParameterName)thisIsAVeryLongParameterName
longMethodParameter:(LongParameterName)thisIsAlsoAnotherLongParameterName;
```
We'd like clang-format in the google style to align these to column 4 for Objective-C:
```
- (VeryLongReturnTypeName)
veryLongMethodParameter:(VeryLongParameterName)thisIsAVeryLongParameterName
longMethodParameter:(LongParameterName)thisIsAlsoAnotherLongParameterName;
```
Test Plan: make -j12 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41195
llvm-svn: 320714
update the type from the definition even if we didn't instantiate a definition.
We may have instantiated the definition in an earlier stage of semantic
analysis, after creating the DeclRefExpr but before we reach a point where a
complete expression type is required.
llvm-svn: 320709
Adding the new enumerator forced a bunch more changes into this patch than I
would have liked. The -Wtautological-compare warning was extended to properly
check the new comparison operator, clang-format needed updating because it uses
precedence levels as weights for determining where to break lines (and several
operators increased their precedence levels with this change), thread-safety
analysis needed changes to build its own IL properly for the new operator.
All "real" semantic checking for this operator has been deferred to a future
patch. For now, we use the relational comparison rules and arbitrarily give
the builtin form of the operator a return type of 'void'.
llvm-svn: 320707
Specifically, warn if:
* we find a character that the language standard says we must treat as an
identifier, and
* that character is not reasonably an identifier character (it's a punctuation
character or similar), and
* it renders identically to a valid non-identifier character in common
fixed-width fonts.
Some tools "helpfully" substitute the surprising characters for the expected
characters, and replacing semicolons with Greek question marks is a common
"prank".
llvm-svn: 320697
Under the Microsoft ABI, it is possible for an object not to have
a virtual table pointer of its own if all of its virtual functions
were introduced by virtual bases. In that case, we need to load the
vtable pointer from one of the virtual bases and perform the type
check using its type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41036
llvm-svn: 320638
Summary:
The backend should only emit data sharing code for the cases where it is needed.
A new function attribute is used by Clang to enable data sharing only for the cases where OpenMP semantics require it and there are variables that need to be shared.
Reviewers: hfinkel, Hahnfeld, ABataev, carlo.bertolli, caomhin
Reviewed By: ABataev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41123
llvm-svn: 320527
This patch is to add diagnose when a function name is
specified on the link clause. According to the OpenMP
spec, only the list items that exclude the function
name are allowed on the link clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40968
llvm-svn: 320521
This patch improves detection of ObjC header files.
Right now many ObjC headers, especially short ones, are categorized as C/C++.
Way of filtering still isn't the best, as most likely it should be token-based.
Contributed by jolesiak!
llvm-svn: 320479
The new check introduced in r318705 is useful, but suffers from a particular
class of false positives, namely, it does not account for
dispatch_barrier_sync() API which allows one to ensure that the asyncronously
executed block that captures a pointer to a local variable does not actually
outlive that variable.
The new check is split into a separate checker, under the name of
alpha.core.StackAddressAsyncEscape, which is likely to get enabled by default
again once these positives are fixed. The rest of the StackAddressEscapeChecker
is still enabled by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41042
llvm-svn: 320455
This is a follow-up from r314910. When a checker developer attempts to
dereference a location in memory through ProgramState::getSVal(Loc) or
ProgramState::getSVal(const MemRegion *), without specifying the second
optional QualType parameter for the type of the value he tries to find at this
location, the type is auto-detected from location type. If the location
represents a value beyond a void pointer, we thought that auto-detecting the
type as 'char' is a good idea. However, in most practical cases, the correct
behavior would be to specify the type explicitly, as it is available from other
sources, and the few cases where we actually need to take a 'char' are
workarounds rather than an intended behavior. Therefore, try to fail with an
easy-to-understand assertion when asked to read from a void pointer location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38801
llvm-svn: 320451
This adds a new command line option -mprefer-vector-width to specify a preferred vector width for the vectorizers. Valid values are 'none' and unsigned integers. The driver will check that it meets those constraints. Specific supported integers will be managed by the targets in the backend.
Clang will take the value and add it as a new function attribute during CodeGen.
This represents the alternate direction proposed by Sanjay in this RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-November/118734.html
The syntax here matches gcc, though gcc treats it as an x86 specific command line argument. gcc only allows values of 128, 256, and 512. I'm not having clang check any values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40230
llvm-svn: 320419
The two asserts are too aggressive. In C++ mode, an
enum is NOT considered an integral type, but an enum value
is allowed to be an enum. This patch relaxes the two asserts
to allow the enum value as well (as typechecking does).
llvm-svn: 320411
Summary:
This is a side-effect brought in by p0620r0, which allows other placeholder types (derived from `auto` and `decltype(auto)`) to be usable in a `new` expression with a single-clause //braced-init-list// as its initializer (8.3.4 [expr.new]/2). N3922 defined its semantics.
References:
http://wg21.link/p0620r0http://wg21.link/n3922
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39451
llvm-svn: 320401
Summary:
Clang was crashing when diagnosing an unused-lambda-capture for a VLA because
From.getVariable() is null for the capture of a VLA bound.
Warning about the VLA bound capture is not helpful, so only warn for the VLA
itself.
Fixes: PR35555
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, dim, rsmith
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, dim
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41016
llvm-svn: 320396
As reported in llvm bugzilla 32377.
Here’s a patch to add preinclude of stdc-predef.h.
The gcc documentation says “On GNU/Linux, <stdc-predef.h> is pre-included.” See https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/porting_to.html;
The preinclude is inhibited with –ffreestanding.
Basically I fixed the failing test cases by adding –ffreestanding which inhibits this behavior.
I fixed all the failing tests, including some in extra/test, there's a separate patch for that which is linked here
Note: this is a recommit after a test failure took down the original (r318669)
Patch By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34158
llvm-svn: 320391
microMIPS64R6 is removed from backend, and therefore frontend
will show an error when target is microMIPS64R6.
This is Clang part of patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35624
llvm-svn: 320351
The simulator variant of Darwin's platforms is removed in favor of a new
environment field.
The code that selects the platform and the version is split into 4 different
functions instead of being all in one function.
This is an NFC commit, although it slightly improves the
"invalid version number" diagnostic by displaying the environment variable
instead of -m<os>-version-min if the OS version was derived from the
environment.
rdar://35813850
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41035
llvm-svn: 320235
Summary:
There is no such library on NetBSD, the corresponding functions like dlopen(3) are in libc.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, eugenis
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: dberris, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41021
llvm-svn: 320220
This commit fixes a bug in IRGen where it generates completely broken
code for __fp16 vectors on X86. For example when the following code is
compiled:
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2; // these are vectors of __fp16.
void foo221() {
hv0 = hv1 + hv2;
}
clang generates the following IR, in which two i16 vectors are added:
@hv1 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv2 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
@hv0 = common global <4 x i16> zeroinitializer, align 8
define void @foo221() {
%0 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv1, align 8
%1 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* @hv2, align 8
%add = add <4 x i16> %0, %1
store <4 x i16> %add, <4 x i16>* @hv0, align 8
ret void
}
To fix the bug, this commit uses the code committed in r314056, which
modified clang to promote and truncate __fp16 vectors to and from float
vectors in the AST. It also fixes another IRGen bug where a short value
is assigned to an __fp16 variable without any integer-to-floating-point
conversion, as shown in the following example:
__fp16 a;
short b;
void foo1() {
a = b;
}
@b = common global i16 0, align 2
@a = common global i16 0, align 2
define void @foo1() #0 {
%0 = load i16, i16* @b, align 2
store i16 %0, i16* @a, align 2
ret void
}
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40112
llvm-svn: 320215
and fold together into a single function.
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
This re-commits r320122 and r320124, minus two changes:
* Comparisons between a constant and a non-constant expression of enumeration
type never warn, not even if the constant is out of range. We should be
warning about the creation of such a constant, not about its use.
* We do not use more precise bit-widths for comparisons against bit-fields.
The more precise diagnostics probably are the right thing, but we should
consider moving them under their own warning flag.
Other than the refactoring, this patch should only change the behavior for the
buggy cases (where the warnings didn't take into account that promotion from
signed to unsigned can leave a range of inaccessible values in the middle of
the promoted type).
llvm-svn: 320211
This is a follow-up to r320128. Eli pointed out that there is some gray
area in the language standard about whether the constant size is exact,
or a lower bound.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40940
llvm-svn: 320185
> Unify implementation of our two different flavours of -Wtautological-compare.
>
> In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
> positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
> for the comparison.
This caused a new warning in Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 64.
I thought we didn't use to warn (with out-of-range-compare) when comparing
against the boundaries of a type?
llvm-svn: 320162
This broke Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 63.
Did this use to fall under the "in-range" case before? I thought we
didn't use to warn when comparing against the boundaries of a type.
llvm-svn: 320133
There is no way to apply sanitizer suppressions to ObjC blocks. A
reasonable default is to have blocks inherit their parent's sanitizer
options.
rdar://32769634
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40668
llvm-svn: 320132
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
llvm-svn: 320122
This adds -std=c17, -std=gnu17, and -std=iso9899:2017 as language mode flags for C17 and updates the value of __STDC_VERSION__ to the value based on the C17 FDIS. Given that this ballot cannot succeed until 2018, it is expected that we (and GCC) will add c18 flags as aliases once the ballot passes.
llvm-svn: 320089
This behaves similar to the __has_cpp_attribute builtin macro in that it allows users to detect whether an attribute is supported with the [[]] spelling syntax, which can be enabled in C with -fdouble-square-bracket-attributes.
llvm-svn: 320088
Private variables are completely redefined in the outlined regions, so
we don't need to capture them. Patch adds this behavior to the
target-based regions.
llvm-svn: 320078
Summary:
This enables us to use information in Preprocessor when handling symbol
occurrences.
Reviewers: arphaman, hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: malaperle, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40884
llvm-svn: 320030
This is a follow up of r302131, in which we forgot to add SemaChecking
tests. Adding these tests revealed two problems which have been fixed:
- added missing intrinsic __qdbl,
- properly range checking ssat16 and usat16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40888
llvm-svn: 320019
Artem Dergachev