Summary: This patch changes the function profile output order to be deterministic. In order to make it easier to understand, hottest functions (with most total samples) is ordered first.
Reviewers: dnovillo, davidxl
Reviewed By: dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33111
llvm-svn: 302851
The SampleProfWriter emits function information in an order determined
by the string hash function. The situation is a bit brittle, because
changing the hash function can break the tests.
Instead of sorting the function samples to get a relaible ordering (that
might be too expensive), make the tests not depend on a particular
ordering of function samples.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32516
llvm-svn: 301419
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 253009
Summary:
This change addresses two possible instances of user error / confusion when
merging sampled profile data.
Previously any input that didn't match the raw or processed instrumented format
would automatically be interpreted as instrumented profile text format data.
No error would be reported during the merge.
Example:
If foo-sampled.profdata and bar-sampled.profdata are binary sampled profiles:
Old behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -output foobar-sampled.profdata
$ llvm-profdata show -sample foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foobar-sampled.profdata:1: Expected 'mangled_name:NUM:NUM', found lprofi
This change adds basic checks for valid input data when assuming text input.
It also makes error messages related to file format validity more specific about
the assumbed profile data type.
New behavior:
$ llvm-profdata merge foo-sampled.profdata bar-sampled.profdata -o foobar-sampled.profdata
error: foo.profdata: Unrecognized instrumentation profile encoding format
Perhaps you forgot to use the -sample option?
Reviewers: bogner, davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14558
llvm-svn: 252916
Summary:
This patch extends the 'show' and 'merge' commands in llvm-profdata to handle
sample PGO formats. Using the 'merge' command it is now possible to convert
one sample PGO format to another.
The only format that is currently not working is 'gcc'. I still need to
implement support for it in lib/ProfileData.
The changes in the sample profile support classes are needed for the
merge operation.
Reviewers: bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6065
llvm-svn: 221032
Dehao Chen