According the build bots, clang is using the Registry class somewhere as well. Will reapply with appropriate clang changes at a later point.
llvm-svn: 258159
The Registry class constructs a linked list of nodes whose storage is inside static variables and nodes are added via static initializers. The trick is that those static initializers are in both the LLVM code base, and some random plugin that might get loaded in at runtime. The existing code tries to use C++ templates and their ODR rules to get a single definition of the registry for each type, but, experimentally, this doesn't quite work as designed. (Well, the entire structure doesn't. It might not actually be an ODR problem.)
Previously, when I tried moving the GCStrategy class (along with it's registry) from CodeGen to IR, I ran into a problem where asking the GCStrategyRegistry a question would return inconsistent results depending on whether you asked from CodeGen (where the static initializers still were) or Transforms. My best guess is that this is a result of either a) an order of initialization error, or b) we ended up with two copies of the registry being created. I remember at the time having convinced myself it was probably (b), but I don't have any of my notes around from that investigation any more.
See http://reviews.llvm.org/rL226311 for the original patch in question.
This patch tries to remove the possibility of (b) above. (a) was already fixed in change 258109.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16170
llvm-svn: 258157
This patch creates the profile data variable before lowering the profile intrinsics.
Reviewers: davidxl, silvas
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16015
llvm-svn: 258156
Our loop construct is not a way to identify cycles in the CFG. This wasn't immediately obvious from the header, so clarify that fact.
The motivation for this was that I just fixed a out of tree bug due to a mistaken assumption (on my part) on what a Loop actually was. While it was fresh in my mind, I wanted to document the key point.
llvm-svn: 258154
This is a continuation of adding FMF to call instructions:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL255555
As with D15937, the intent of the patch is to preserve the current behavior of the transform
except that we use the pow call's 'fast' attribute as a trigger rather than a function-level
attribute.
The TODO comment notes a potential follow-on patch that would propagate FMF to the new
instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16122
llvm-svn: 258153
until we are visiting their declcontext.
This fixes a regression introduced in r256962:
When building debug info for a typdef'd anonymous tag type, we would be
visiting the inner anonymous type first thus creating a "typedef changes
linkage of anonymous type, but linkage was already computed" error.
rdar://problem/24199640
llvm-svn: 258152
Summary:
add_version_info_from_vcs was setting SVN_REVISION to the last fetched
svn revision when using git svn instead of the svn revision
corresponding to HEAD. This leads to conflicts with the definition of
SVN_REVISION in SVNVersion.inc generated by GetSVN.cmake when HEAD is
not the most recently fetched svn revision.
Use 'git svn info' to determine SVN_REVISION when git svn is being used
instead (as is done in GetSVN.cmake).
Reviewers: beanz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16299
llvm-svn: 258148
Summary:
GEPOperator: provide getResultElementType alongside getSourceElementType.
This is made possible by adding a result element type field to GetElementPtrConstantExpr, which GetElementPtrInst already has.
GEP: replace get(Pointer)ElementType uses with get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16275
llvm-svn: 258145
Teach the register stackifier to rematerialize constants that have multiple
uses instead of leaving them in registers. In the WebAssembly encoding, it's
the same code size to materialize most constants as it is to read a value
from a register.
llvm-svn: 258142
The value size was always 1 or 0, so we don't need to store it.
In a no asserts build this takes the testcase of pr26208 from 11 to 10
seconds.
llvm-svn: 258141
According to x86 spec "xlat m8" is a legal instruction and it is equivalent to "xlatb".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15150
llvm-svn: 258135
Summary:
This patch fixes shebang lines in Python script files.
Most Python scripts in LLVM & Clang are using this shebang line.
[[ https://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2007-June/054816.html | Here]] is an explanaiton of why such line should be used instead of what is currently in these few files.
Reviewers: klimek, alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by Kirill Bobyrev!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16270
llvm-svn: 258133
The following are legal according to X86 spec:
ins mem, DX
outs DX, mem
lods mem
stos mem
scas mem
cmps mem, mem
movs mem, mem
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14827
llvm-svn: 258132
[cpp.cond]p4:
Prior to evaluation, macro invocations in the list of preprocessing
tokens that will become the controlling constant expression are replaced
(except for those macro names modified by the 'defined' unary operator),
just as in normal text. If the token 'defined' is generated as a result
of this replacement process or use of the 'defined' unary operator does
not match one of the two specified forms prior to macro replacement, the
behavior is undefined.
This isn't an idle threat, consider this program:
#define FOO
#define BAR defined(FOO)
#if BAR
...
#else
...
#endif
clang and gcc will pick the #if branch while Visual Studio will take the
#else branch. Emit a warning about this undefined behavior.
One problem is that this also applies to function-like macros. While the
example above can be written like
#if defined(FOO) && defined(BAR)
#defined HAVE_FOO 1
#else
#define HAVE_FOO 0
#endif
there is no easy way to rewrite a function-like macro like `#define FOO(x)
(defined __foo_##x && __foo_##x)`. Function-like macros like this are used in
practice, and compilers seem to not have differing behavior in that case. So
this a default-on warning only for object-like macros. For function-like
macros, it is an extension warning that only shows up with `-pedantic`.
(But it's undefined behavior in both cases.)
llvm-svn: 258128
Summary:
The issue arises because LLDB is not
able to read the vdso library correctly.
The fix adds memory allocation callbacks
to allocate sufficient memory in case the
requested offsets don't fit in the memory
buffer allocated for the ELF.
Reviewers: lldb-commits, clayborg, deepak2427, ovyalov, labath, tberghammer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16107
llvm-svn: 258122
TestHelloWorld seems to be passing now as far as I can tell. TestExitDuringStep is still hanging.
I have marked the relevant tests as flaky, which should handle the timeouts now as well. I'll be
monitoring the buildbots for fallout.
llvm-svn: 258114
The ELF symbol table always contain the size of the symbols so we
don't have to try to guess them based on the address of the next
symbol (it is needed for mach-o).
The change fixes an issue when a symbol is removed after a 0 size
symbol (e.g. because the second one is not public) what previously
caused the symbol lookup algorithm to end up with showing the 0 size
symbol even for the later addresses (what are not part of any symbol).
That symbol lookup error can confuse the user and also confuses the
current stack unwinder.
Re-commit this CL after fixing the issue with gcc-4.9.2 on i386 Linux.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16186
llvm-svn: 258113
This commit changes the default on our lowering of vectors-of-pointers from splitting in RS4GC to reporting them in the final stack map. All of the changes to do so are already in place and tested. Assuming no problems are unearthed in the next week, we will be deleting the old code entirely next Monday.
llvm-svn: 258111
Or, do not set Sema's CurContext to the template declaration's when substituting into default template arguments of said template declaration.
If we do push the template declaration context on to Sema, and the template declaration is at namespace scope, Sema can get confused and try and do odr analysis when substituting into default template arguments, even though the substitution could be occurring within a dependent context.
I'm not sure why this was being done, perhaps there was concern that if a default template argument referred to a previous template parameter, it might not be found during substitution - but all regression tests pass, and I can't craft a test that would cause it to fails (if some one does, please inform me, and i'll craft a different fix for the PR).
This patch removes a single line of code, but unfortunately adds more than it removes, because of the tests. Some day I still hope to commit a patch that removes far more lines than it adds, while leaving clang better for it ;)
Sorry that r253590 ("Change the expression evaluation context from Unevaluated to ConstantEvaluated while substituting into non-type template argument defaults") caused the PR!
llvm-svn: 258110
Combine a bunch of small files into a single, still rather small, file. The primary purpose of this is to get all of the static initializers into a single file so as to have a well defined order of initialization.
llvm-svn: 258109
In Polly, after hoisting loop invariant loads outside loop, the alignment
information for hoisted loads are missing, this patch restore them.
Contributed-by: Lawrence Hu <lawrence@codeaurora.org>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16160
llvm-svn: 258105
Philip Reames