Instruction Selection
Cleanup cycle/validity checks in ISel (IsLegalToFold,
HandleMergeInputChains) and X86 (isFusableLoadOpStore). Now do a full
search for cycles / dependencies pruning the search when topological
property of NodeId allows.
As part of this propogate the NodeId-based cutoffs to narrow
hasPreprocessorHelper searches.
Reviewers: craig.topper, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41293
llvm-svn: 324359
Summary: Now that PR33325 is fixed, this should always improve the generated code.
Reviewers: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42793
llvm-svn: 324317
Summary:
This method is trying to use the truncate node to find which SETCC operand should be replaced directly with the extended load.
This used to work correctly because all uses of the original load were replaced by the truncate before this function was called. So this was used to effectively bypass the truncate and find the load under it.
All but one of the callers now call this before the truncate has replaced the laod so the setcc doesn't yet use the truncate. To account for this we should pass the original load instead.
I changed the order of that one caller to make this work there too.
I don't have a test case because this is probably hidden by later DAG combines causing the extend and truncate to cancel out. I assume this way is a little more efficient and matches what was originally intended.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42878
llvm-svn: 324311
Summary:
If the load is already an extended load we should be using the memory VT for the legality check, not just the VT of the current extension.
I don't have a test case, just noticed it while investigating some load extension improvements.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, niravd
Reviewed By: niravd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42783
llvm-svn: 324181
Better to assume that any value type may be commuted, not just MVTs.
No test case right now, but discovered while investigating possible shuffle combines.
llvm-svn: 324179
When handling vectors with non byte-sized elements, reverse the order of the
elements in the built integer if the target is Big-Endian.
SystemZ tests updated.
Review: Eli Friedman, Ulrich Weigand.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D42786
llvm-svn: 324063
When getNode() is called to create an EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT, assert that
the result VT is at least as wide as the vector element type.
Review: Eli Friedman
llvm-svn: 324061
Example situation:
```
BB0:
%0 = ...
use %0
; ...
condjump BB1
jmp BB2
BB1:
%0 = ... ; rematerialized def from above (from earlier split step)
jmp BB2
BB2:
; ...
use %0
```
%0 will have a live interval with 3 value numbers (for the BB0, BB1 and
BB2 parts). Now SplitKit tries and succeeds in rematerializing the value
number in BB2 (This only works because it is a secondary split so
SplitKit is can trace this back to a single original def).
We need to recompute all live ranges affected by a value number that we
rematerialize. The case that we missed before is that when the value
that is rematerialized is at a join (Phi VNI) then we also have to
recompute liveness for the predecessor VNIs.
rdar://35699130
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42667
llvm-svn: 324039
We were only checking the element count, but not the total width. This could cause illegal bitcasts to be created if for example the output was 512-bits, but N1 is 256 bits, and the extraction size was 128-bits.
Fixes PR36199
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42809
llvm-svn: 324002
Until we support extending loads properly we're going to fall back for these.
We already handle stores in the same way, so this is just being consistent.
llvm-svn: 324001
Increment the field list member count for base classes and virtual base
classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41874
llvm-svn: 324000
Summary:
This change extends MachineCopyPropagation to do COPY source forwarding
and adds an additional run of the pass to the default pass pipeline just
after register allocation.
This version of this patch uses the newly added
MachineOperand::isRenamable bit to avoid forwarding registers is such a
way as to violate constraints that aren't captured in the
Machine IR (e.g. ABI or ISA constraints).
This change is a continuation of the work started in D30751.
Reviewers: qcolombet, javed.absar, MatzeB, jonpa, tstellar
Subscribers: tpr, mgorny, mcrosier, nhaehnle, nemanjai, jyknight, hfinkel, arsenm, inouehrs, eraman, sdardis, guyblank, fedor.sergeev, aheejin, dschuff, jfb, myatsina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41835
llvm-svn: 323991
As shown in the example in PR34994:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34994
...we can return a very wrong answer (inf instead of 0.0) for square root when
using a reciprocal square root estimate instruction.
Here, I've conditionalized the filtering out of denorms based on the function
having "denormal-fp-math"="ieee" in its attributes. The other options for this
attribute are 'preserve-sign' and 'positive-zero'.
So we don't generate this extra code by default with just '-ffast-math' (because
then there's no denormal attribute string at all), but it works if you specify
'-ffast-math -fdenormal-fp-math=ieee' from clang.
As noted in the review, there may be other problems in clang that affect the
results depending on platform (Linux x86 at least), but this should allow
creating the desired codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42323
llvm-svn: 323981
Summary:
In Instruction Selection UpdateChains replaces all matched Nodes'
chain references including interior token factors and deletes them.
This may allow nodes which depend on these interior nodes but are not
part of the set of matched nodes to be left with a dangling dependence.
Avoid this by doing the replacement for matched non-TokenFactor nodes.
Fixes PR36164.
Reviewers: jonpa, RKSimon, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42754
llvm-svn: 323977
Summary:
This change expands the amount of registers stashed by the entry and
`__xray_CustomEvent` trampolines.
We've found that since the `__xray_CustomEvent` trampoline calls can show up in
situations where the scratch registers are being used, and since we don't
typically want to affect the code-gen around the disabled
`__xray_customevent(...)` intrinsic calls, that we need to save and restore the
state of even the scratch registers in the handling of these custom events.
Reviewers: pcc, pelikan, dblaikie, eizan, kpw, echristo, chandlerc
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: chandlerc, echristo, hiraditya, davide, dblaikie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40894
llvm-svn: 323940
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
Summary:
Call MRI.freezeReservedRegs() on functions created during outlining so
that calls to isReserved() by the verifier called after this pass won't
assert.
Reviewers: MatzeB, qcolombet, paquette
Subscribers: mcrosier, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42749
llvm-svn: 323905
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the
CodeGenPrepare pass to be more aggressive in improving the source and destination alignments
of memcpy/memmove/memset by exploiting our new ability to record independent alignments
for each argument.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead. ( rL323886 )
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
llvm-svn: 323891
This commit came as a result for revert of patch r317579 (originally
committed as r317100). The patch made CFI instructions duplicable, because
their existence in the epilogue block was affecting the Tail duplication
pass. However, duplicating blocks with CFI instructions was an issue for
compact unwind info on Darwin, which is why the patch was reverted.
This patch allows duplicating tails with CFI instructions, though they are
not duplicable, by copying them 'manually'.
Patch by Djordje Kovacevic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40979
llvm-svn: 323883
Summary:
Instruction Selection preserves relative orders of all nodes save
TokenFactors which we treat specially. As a result Node Ids for
TokenFactors may violate the topological ordering and should not be
considered as valid pruning candidates in predecessor search.
Fixes PR35316.
Reviewers: RKSimon, hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42701
llvm-svn: 323880
In D41587, @mssimpso discovered that the order of some patterns for
AArch64 was sub-optimal. I thought a bit about how we could avoid that
case in the future. I do not think there is a need for evaluating all
patterns for now. But this patch adds an extra (expensive) check, that
evaluates the latencies of all patterns, and ensures that the latency
saved decreases for subsequent patterns.
This catches the sub-optimal order fixed in D41587, but I am not
entirely happy with the check, as it only applies to sub-optimal
patterns seen while building with EXPENSIVE_CHECKS on. It did not
discover any other sub-optimal pattern ordering.
Reviewers: Gerolf, spatel, mssimpso
Reviewed By: Gerolf, mssimpso
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41766
llvm-svn: 323873
When selecting a split candidate for region splitting, the register allocator tries to predict which candidate will have the cheapest spill cost.
Global splitting may cause the creation of local intervals, and they might spill.
This patch makes RA take into account the spill cost of local split intervals in use blocks (we already take into account the spill cost in through blocks).
A flag ("-condsider-local-interval-cost") controls weather we do this advanced cost calculation (it's on by default for X86 target, off for the rest).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41585
Change-Id: Icccb8ad2dbf13124f5d97a18c67d95aa6be0d14d
llvm-svn: 323870
In Thumb 1, with the new ADDCARRY / SUBCARRY the scheduler may need to do
copies CPSR ↔ GPR but not all Thumb1 targets implement them.
The schedule can attempt, before attempting a copy, to clone the instructions
but it does not currently do that for nodes with input glue. In this patch we
introduce a target-hook to let the hook decide if a glued machinenode is still
eligible for copying. In this case these are ARM::tADCS and ARM::tSBCS .
As a follow-up of this change we should actually implement the copies for the
Thumb1 targets that do implement them and restrict the hook to the targets that
can't really do such copy as these clones are not ideal.
This change fixes PR35836.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42051
llvm-svn: 323857
Sometimes users do not specify data layout in LLVM assembly and let llc set the
data layout by target triple after loading the LLVM assembly.
Currently the parser checks alloca address space no matter whether the LLVM
assembly contains data layout definition, which causes false alarm since the
default data layout does not contain the correct alloca address space.
The parser also calls verifier to check debug info and updating invalid debug
info. Currently there is no way to let the verifier to check debug info only.
If the verifier finds non-debug-info issues the parser will fail.
For llc, the fix is to remove the check of alloca addr space in the parser and
disable updating debug info, and defer the updating of debug info and
verification to be after setting data layout of the IR by target.
For other llvm tools, since they do not override data layout by target but
instead can override data layout by a command line option, an argument for
overriding data layout is added to the parser. In cases where data layout
overriding is necessary for the parser, the data layout can be provided by
command line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41832
llvm-svn: 323826
Introduce an extension to support passing linker options to the linker.
These would be ignored by older linkers, but newer linkers which support
this feature would be able to process the linker.
Emit a special discarded section `.linker-option`. The content of this
section is a pair of strings (key, value). The key is a type identifier for
the parameter. This allows for an argument free parameter that will be
processed by the linker with the value being the parameter. As an example,
`lib` identifies a library to be linked against, traditionally the `-l`
argument for Unix-based linkers with the parameter being the library name.
Thanks to James Henderson, Cary Coutant, Rafael Espinolda, Sean Silva
for the valuable discussion on the design of this feature.
llvm-svn: 323783
PR36061 showed that during the expansion of ISD::FPOWI, that there
was an incorrect zero extension of the integer argument which for
MIPS64 would then give incorrect results. Address this with the
existing mechanism for correcting sign extensions.
This resolves PR36061.
Thanks to James Cowgill for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: atanasyan, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42537
llvm-svn: 323781
Legal if we have hardware support for floating point, libcalls
otherwise.
Also add the necessary support for libcalls in the legalizer helper.
llvm-svn: 323726
When a function return value can't be directly lowered, such as
returning an i128 on WebAssembly, as indicated by the CanLowerReturn
target hook, SelectionDAGBuilder can translate it to return the
value through a hidden sret-like argument.
If such a function has an argument with the "returned" attribute,
the attribute can't be automatically lowered, because the function
no longer has a normal return value. For now, just discard the
"returned" attribute.
This fixes PR36128.
llvm-svn: 323715
When RAFast sees liveins in on a basic block, it uses that information
to initialize the availability of the registers. The called
method uses an instruction as one of its argument and in the liveins
case, RAFast was dereferencing MBB::begin which can be MBB::end for
empty basic block.
Change the API of definePhysReg to use MachineBasicBlock::iterator
instead of MachineInstr so that we don't dereference an
invalid iterator while making the call.
rdar://problem/36952401
llvm-svn: 323710
Summary:
Apparently, we missed on constraining register classes of VReg-operands of all the instructions
built from a destination pattern but the root (top-level) one. The issue exposed itself
while selecting G_FPTOSI for armv7: the corresponding pattern generates VTOSIZS wrapped
into COPY_TO_REGCLASS, so top-level COPY_TO_REGCLASS gets properly constrained,
while nested VTOSIZS (or rather its destination virtual register to be exact) does not.
Fixing this by issuing GIR_ConstrainSelectedInstOperands for every nested GIR_BuildMI.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35965
rdar://problem/36886530
Patch by Roman Tereshin
Reviewers: dsanders, qcolombet, rovka, bogner, aditya_nandakumar, volkan
Reviewed By: dsanders, qcolombet, rovka
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42565
llvm-svn: 323692
Prior to committing r323681, we decided to change pick() to identity() since
it wasn't clear from the name what pick() did. However, identity() isn't a very
good name either since it implies that no changes are made. For some reason,
naming it changeTo() didn't occur to me until just after the commit. This
should resolve the lack of clarity that pick() had while still implying that
it changes the MIR.
llvm-svn: 323689
Rafael pointed out that `hasInternalLinkage() || hasPrivateLinkage()` is
equivalent to `hasLocalLinkage()` in post-commit review.
I'm intentionally not updating the comment, partly because I like it
being explicit, and partly because "global symbols with local linkage"
sounds like an oxymoron.
llvm-svn: 323688
Summary:
As discussed in D42244, we have difficulty describing the legality of some
operations. We're not able to specify relationships between types.
For example, declaring the following
setAction({..., 0, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 0, s64}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s32}, Legal)
setAction({..., 1, s64}, Legal)
currently declares these type combinations as legal:
{s32, s32}
{s64, s32}
{s32, s64}
{s64, s64}
but we currently have no means to say that, for example, {s64, s32} is
not legal. Some operations such as G_INSERT/G_EXTRACT/G_MERGE_VALUES/
G_UNMERGE_VALUES have relationships between the types that are currently
described incorrectly.
Additionally, G_LOAD/G_STORE currently have no means to legalize non-atomics
differently to atomics. The necessary information is in the MMO but we have no
way to use this in the legalizer. Similarly, there is currently no way for the
register type and the memory type to differ so there is no way to cleanly
represent extending-load/truncating-store in a way that can't be broken by
optimizers (resulting in illegal MIR).
It's also difficult to control the legalization strategy. We've added support
for legalizing non-power of 2 types but there's still some hardcoded assumptions
about the strategy. The main one I've noticed is that type0 is always legalized
before type1 which is not a good strategy for `type0 = G_EXTRACT type1, ...` if
you need to widen the container. It will converge on the same result eventually
but it will take a much longer route when legalizing type0 than if you legalize
type1 first.
Lastly, the definition of legality and the legalization strategy is kept
separate which is not ideal. It's helpful to be able to look at a one piece of
code and see both what is legal and the method the legalizer will use to make
illegal MIR more legal.
This patch adds a layer onto the LegalizerInfo (to be removed when all targets
have been migrated) which resolves all these issues.
Here are the rules for shift and division:
for (unsigned BinOp : {G_LSHR, G_ASHR, G_SDIV, G_UDIV})
getActionDefinitions(BinOp)
.legalFor({s32, s64}) // If type0 is s32/s64 then it's Legal
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64) // If type0 is <s32 then WidenScalar to s32
// If type0 is >s64 then NarrowScalar to s64
.widenScalarToPow2(0) // Round type0 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported(); // Otherwise, it's unsupported
This describes everything needed to both define legality and describe how to
make illegal things legal.
Here's an example of a complex rule:
getActionDefinitions(G_INSERT)
.unsupportedIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is smaller than type1 then it's unsupported
return Query.Types[0].getSizeInBits() <= Query.Types[1].getSizeInBits();
})
.legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) {
// If type0 is s32/s64/p0 and type1 is a power of 2 other than 2 or 4 then it's legal
// We don't need to worry about large type1's because unsupportedIf caught that.
const LLT &Ty0 = Query.Types[0];
const LLT &Ty1 = Query.Types[1];
if (Ty0 != s32 && Ty0 != s64 && Ty0 != p0)
return false;
return isPowerOf2_32(Ty1.getSizeInBits()) &&
(Ty1.getSizeInBits() == 1 || Ty1.getSizeInBits() >= 8);
})
.clampScalar(0, s32, s64)
.widenScalarToPow2(0)
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s32}), 1, s16) // If type0 is s32 and type1 is bigger than s16 then NarrowScalar type1 to s16
.maxScalarIf(typeInSet(0, {s64}), 1, s32) // If type0 is s64 and type1 is bigger than s32 then NarrowScalar type1 to s32
.widenScalarToPow2(1) // Round type1 scalars up to powers of 2
.unsupported();
This uses a lambda to say that G_INSERT is unsupported when type0 is bigger than
type1 (in practice, this would be a default rule for G_INSERT). It also uses one
to describe the legal cases. This particular predicate is equivalent to:
.legalFor({{s32, s1}, {s32, s8}, {s32, s16}, {s64, s1}, {s64, s8}, {s64, s16}, {s64, s32}})
In terms of performance, I saw a slight (~6%) performance improvement when
AArch64 was around 30% ported but it's pretty much break even right now.
I'm going to take a look at constexpr as a means to reduce the initialization
cost.
Future work:
* Make it possible for opcodes to share rulesets. There's no need for
G_LSHR/G_ASHR/G_SDIV/G_UDIV to have separate rule and ruleset objects. There's
no technical barrier to this, it just hasn't been done yet.
* Replace the type-index numbers with an enum to get .clampScalar(Type0, s32, s64)
* Better names for things like .maxScalarIf() (clampMaxScalar?) and the vector rules.
* Improve initialization cost using constexpr
Possible future work:
* It's possible to make these rulesets change the MIR directly instead of
returning a description of how to change the MIR. This should remove a little
overhead caused by parsing the description and routing to the right code, but
the real motivation is that it removes the need for LegalizeAction::Custom.
With Custom removed, there's no longer a requirement that Custom legalization
change the opcode to something that's considered legal.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, reames, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: hintonda, bogner, aemerson, mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42251
llvm-svn: 323681
Sanjay Patel