gcc treats [[gnu:const]], [[gnu::__const]], and [[gnu:__const__]] as all being
equivalent. Add an additional test case to ensure that we do not miss the last
case.
llvm-svn: 195982
Introduce a new AST Decl node "EmptyDecl" to model empty-declaration. Have attributes from attribute-declaration appertain
to the EmptyDecl node by creating the AST representations of these attributes and attach them to the EmptyDecl node so these
attributes can be sema checked just as attributes attached to "normal" declarations.
llvm-svn: 175900
the diagnostic's warn_ name. Switch some places (notably C++11 attributes)
which really wanted an error over to a different diagnostic. Finally, suppress
the diagnostic entirely for __ptr32, __ptr64 and __w64, to avoid producing
diagnostics in important system headers.
llvm-svn: 173788
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
1) Supported by Clang, and
2) Supported by GCC, and
3) Documented in GCC's manual.
g++ allows its C++11-style attributes to appertain only to the entity being
declared, and never to a type (even for a type attribute), so we do the same.
llvm-svn: 172382
Following r168626, in class declaration or definition, there are a combination of syntactic locations
where C++11 attributes could appear, and among those the only valid location permitted by standard is
between class-key and class-name. So for those attributes appear at wrong locations, fixit is used to
move them to expected location and we recover by applying them to the class specifier.
llvm-svn: 171757
This change list implemented logic that explicitly detects several combinations of locations where C++11 attribute
specifiers might be incorrectly placed within a class specifier. Previously we emit generic diagnostics like
"expected identifier" for such cases; now we emit specific diagnostic against the misplaced attributes, this also
fixed a bug in old code where attributes appear at legitimate locations were incorrectly rejected.
Thanks to Richard Smith for reviewing!
llvm-svn: 168626
We don't support any C++11 attributes that appertain to declaration specifiers so reject
the attributes in parser until we support them; this also conforms to what g++ 4.8 is doing.
llvm-svn: 167481
- General C++11 attributes were previously parsed and ignored. Now they are parsed and stored in AST.
- Add support to parse arguments of attributes that in 'gnu' namespace.
- Differentiate unknown attributes and known attributes that can't be applied to statements when emitting diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 165082
attributes in more places where we didn't and catching a lot more issues.
This implements nearly every aspect of C++11 attribute parsing, except for:
- Attributes are permitted on explicit instantiations inside the declarator
(but not preceding the decl-spec)
- Attributes are permitted on friend declarations of functions.
- Multiple instances of the same attribute in an attribute-list (e.g.
[[noreturn, noreturn]], not [[noreturn]] [[noreturn]] which is conforming)
are allowed.
The first two are marked as expected-FIXME in the test file and the latter
is probably a defect and is currently untested.
Thanks to Richard Smith for providing the lion's share of the testcases.
llvm-svn: 159072
* Alternative tokens (such as 'compl') are treated as identifiers in
attribute names.
* An attribute-list can start with a comma.
* An ellipsis may not be used with either of our currently-supported
C++11 attributes.
llvm-svn: 154381
* In C++11, '[[' is ill-formed unless it starts an attribute-specifier. Reject
array sizes and array indexes which begin with a lambda-expression. Recover by
parsing the lambda as a lambda.
* In Objective-C++11, either '[' could be the start of a message-send.
Fully disambiguate this case: it turns out that the grammars of message-sends,
lambdas and attributes do not actually overlap. Accept any occurrence of '[['
where either '[' starts a message send, but reject a lambda in an array index
just like in C++11 mode.
Implement a couple of changes to the attribute wording which occurred after our
attributes implementation landed:
* In a function-declaration, the attributes go after the exception specification,
not after the right paren.
* A reference type can have attributes applied.
* An 'identifier' in an attribute can also be a keyword. Support for alternative
tokens (iso646 keywords) in attributes to follow.
And some bug fixes:
* Parse attributes after declarator-ids, even if they are not simple identifiers.
* Do not accept attributes after a parenthesized declarator.
* Accept attributes after an array size in a new-type-id.
* Partially disamiguate 'delete' followed by a lambda. More work is required
here for the case where the lambda-introducer is '[]'.
llvm-svn: 154369
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.
Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.
In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.
llvm-svn: 149776
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
Saleem Abdulrasool