Summary:
Get rid of UserVariables set, and turn DbgValues into MapVector
to get a fixed ordering, as suggested in review for http://reviews.llvm.org/D3573.
Test Plan: llvm regression tests
Reviewers: dblaikie
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3579
llvm-svn: 207720
Breaks GDB buildbot
(http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-ubuntu-gdb-75/builds/14517)
GCC emits DW_AT_object_pointer /everywhere/ (declaration, abstract
definition, inlined subroutine), but it looks like GCC relies on it
being somewhere other than the declaration, at least. I'll experiment
further & can hopefully still remove it from the inlined_subroutine.
This reverts commit r207705.
llvm-svn: 207719
They just don't need to be there - they're inherited from the abstract
definition. In theory I would like them to be inherited from the
declaration, but the DWARF standard doesn't quite say that... we can
probably do it anyway but I'm less confident about that so I'll leave it
for a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 207717
This effectively reverts r164326, but adds some comments and
justification and ensures we /don't/ emit the DW_AT_object_pointer on
the (abstract and concrete) definitions. (while still preserving it on
standalone definitions involving ObjC Blocks)
This does increase the size of member function declarations from 7 to 11
bytes, unfortunately, but still seems like the Right Thing to do so that
callers that see only the declaration still have the information about
the object pointer. That said, I don't know what, if any, DWARF
consumers don't have a heuristic to guess this in the case of normal
C++ member functions - perhaps we can remove it entirely.
llvm-svn: 207705
For pattern like ((x >> C1) & Mask) << C2, DAG combiner may convert it
into (x >> (C1-C2)) & (Mask << C2), which makes pattern matching of ubfx
more difficult.
For example:
Given
%shr = lshr i64 %x, 4
%and = and i64 %shr, 15
%arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds [8 x [64 x i64]]* @arr, i64 0, %i64 2, i64 %and
%0 = load i64* %arrayidx
With current shift folding, it takes 3 instrs to compute base address:
lsr x8, x0, #1
and x8, x8, #0x78
add x8, x9, x8
If using ubfx, it only needs 2 instrs:
ubfx x8, x0, #4, #4
add x8, x9, x8, lsl #3
This fixes bug 19589
llvm-svn: 207702
DwarfDebug.h has a SmallVector member containing a unique_ptr of an
incomplete type. MSVC doesn't have key functions, so the vtable and
dtor are emitted in AsmPrinter.cpp, where DwarfDebug's ctor is called.
AsmPrinter.cpp include DwarfUnit.h and doesn't get a complete definition
of DwarfTypeUnit. We could fix the problem by including DwarfUnit.h in
DwarfDebug.h, but that would increase header bloat. Instead, define
~DwarfDebug out of line.
llvm-svn: 207701
These were called from distinct places and had significant distinct
behavior. No need to make that a dynamic check inside the function
rather than just having two functions (refactoring some common code into
a helper function to be called from the two separate functions).
llvm-svn: 207539
Seems at some point the intent was to emit fission ranges_base as unique
per CU but the code today emits ranges_base as the start of the ranges
section for all CUs being compiled and all the ranges_base relative
addresses are relative to that. So removing this dead code and leaving
the status quo until there's a reason to change it (perhaps something's
faster if it has distinct ranges for each CU).
llvm-svn: 207464
(Clang doesn't warn here because it knows the string is benign - the
assert still checks what it's intended to - though putting the correct
parens does make clang-format format the code a little better)
llvm-svn: 207456
Since all 4 ctor calls in DwarfDebug just pass in a trivially
constructed DIE with the right tag type, sink the tag selection down
into the Dwarf*Unit ctors (removing the argument entirely from callers
in DwarfDebug) and initialize the DIE member in DwarfUnit.
llvm-svn: 207448
Now that the subtle constructScopeDIE has been refactored into two
functions - one returning memory to take ownership of, one returning a
pointer to already owning memory - push unique_ptr through more APIs.
I think this completes most of the unique_ptr ownership of DIEs.
llvm-svn: 207442
While refactoring out constructScopeDIE into two functions I realized we
were emitting DW_AT_object_pointer in the inlined subroutine when we
didn't need to (GCC doesn't, and the abstract subprogram definition has
the information already).
So here's the refactoring and the bug fix. This is one step of
refactoring to remove some subtle memory ownership semantics. It turns
out the original constructScopeDIE returned ownership in its return
value in some cases and not in others. The split into two functions now
separates those two semantics - further cleanup (unique_ptr, etc) will
follow.
llvm-svn: 207441
entry. This is in preparation for generic DW_OP_piece support.
No functional change so far.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
llvm-svn: 207368
Richard Smith