Previously we iseled to blend, commuted to another blend, and then commuted back to movss/movsd or blend depending on optsize. Now we do it directly.
llvm-svn: 336976
Summary:
Motivation: {F6597954}
This only does the mechanical splitting, does not actually change
any numbers, as the tests added in previous revision show.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, courbet
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48998
llvm-svn: 336511
Similarily, don't fold fp128 loads into SSE instructions if the load isn't aligned. Unless we're targeting an AMD CPU that doesn't check alignment on arithmetic instructions.
Should fix PR38001
llvm-svn: 336121
Summary:
I ran llvm-exegesis on SKX, SKL, BDW, HSW, SNB.
Atom is from Agner and SLM is a guess.
I've left AMD processors alone.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48079
llvm-svn: 335097
We already have these aliases for EVEX enocded instructions, but not for the GPR, MMX, SSE, and VEX versions.
Also remove the vpextrw.s EVEX alias. That's not something gas implements.
llvm-svn: 334922
These all have a short form encoding that the assembler already prefers. Though that preference seems to only be based on order in the .td fie. Hiding the long form saves space in the table and prevents us from breaking the implicit order based priority.
llvm-svn: 334897
These include PUSH/POP instructions that don't match the manual table. This also includes CMPXCHG which we never emit in non-locked form.
llvm-svn: 334479
Most of these are system instructions or other instructions we don't use in CodeGen. No point wasting space for them in the table. Removing them from the autogenerated table makes it easier to review the manual table.
A few are real opcode collisions where the memory and register forms are completely different instructions.
llvm-svn: 334474
Summary:
In D47428, i propose to choose the `~(-(1 << nbits))` as the canonical form of low-bit-mask formation.
As it is seen from these tests, there is a reason for that.
AArch64 currently better handles `~(-(1 << nbits))`, but not the more traditional `(1 << nbits) - 1` (sic!).
The other way around for X86.
It would be much better to canonicalize.
This patch is completely monkey-typing.
I don't really understand how this works :)
I have based it on `// x & (-1 >> (32 - y))` pattern.
Also, when we only have `BMI`, i wonder if we could use `BEXTR` with `start=0` ?
Related links:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36419https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37603https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37610https://rise4fun.com/Alive/idM
Reviewers: craig.topper, spatel, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47453
llvm-svn: 334125
The index size is represented by the letter after the 'v'. The number represents the memory size. If an 'x' appears after the number its means the index register can be from VR128X/VR256X instead of VR128/VR256.
As vy512mem uses a VR256X index it should have an x.
And vz256mem uses a VR512 index so it shouldn't have an x.
I admit these names kind of suck and are confusing.
llvm-svn: 334120
Only the bottom 16-bits of BEXTR's control op are required (0:8 INDEX, 15:8 LENGTH).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47690
llvm-svn: 334083
Re-add the feature flag for invpcid, which was removed in r294561.
Add an intrinsic, which always uses a 32 bit integer as first argument,
while the instruction actually uses a 64 bit register in 64 bit mode
for the INVPCID_TYPE argument.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47141
llvm-svn: 333255
This property is needed in order to follow values movement between
registers. This property is used in TII to implement method that
returns true if simple copy like instruction is recognized, along
with source and destination machine operands.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45204
llvm-svn: 333093
This patch aims to match the changes introduced in gcc by
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2018-04/msg00534.html. The
IBT feature definition is removed, with the IBT instructions
being freely available on all X86 targets. The shadow stack
instructions are also being made freely available, and the
use of all these CET instructions is controlled by the module
flags derived from the -fcf-protection clang option. The hasSHSTK
option remains since clang uses it to determine availability of
shadow stack instruction intrinsics, but it is no longer directly used.
Comes with a clang patch (D46881).
Patch by mike.dvoretsky
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46882
llvm-svn: 332705
Summary:
and use the -msgx flag as a requirement
for the SGX instructions.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46436
llvm-svn: 331742
Previously for instructions like fxsave we would print "opaque ptr" as part of the memory operand. Now we print nothing.
We also no longer accept "opaque ptr" in the parser. We still accept any size to be specified for these instructions, but we may want to consider only parsing when no explicit size is specified. This what gas does.
llvm-svn: 331243
These aliases are used to default the memory forms of call and jmp to the size of the operating mode. This doesn't work for Intel syntax. We have a different hack in the AsmParser code itself to force a size on unsized memory operands.
llvm-svn: 331153
Many of these aliases exist to give one syntax or the other a slightly different mnemonic and the other variant gets a duplicate of its normal mnemonic
This patch restricts a lot of these to only one variant so we don't get the duplication.
This removes a lot of duplicate entries from the matcher table. It also reduces the number of warnings printed when you enable the ambiguous match warning in tablegen.
llvm-svn: 331117
This encoding is recognized by the CPU, but the behavior is undefined. This makes the disassembler handle it correctly so we don't print bswapl with a 16-bit register.
llvm-svn: 330682
Three new instructions:
umonitor - Sets up a linear address range to be
monitored by hardware and activates the monitor.
The address range should be a writeback memory
caching type.
umwait - A hint that allows the processor to
stop instruction execution and enter an
implementation-dependent optimized state
until occurrence of a class of events.
tpause - Directs the processor to enter an
implementation-dependent optimized state
until the TSC reaches the value in EDX:EAX.
Also modifying the description of the mfence
instruction, as the rep prefix (0xF3) was allowed
before, which would conflict with umonitor during
disassembly.
Before:
$ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble
.text
mfence
After:
$ echo 0xf3,0x0f,0xae,0xf0 | llvm-mc -disassemble
.text
umonitor %rax
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45253
llvm-svn: 330462
The compiler only emits the locked version of these which use different instruction definitions. The versions fixed here are only used by the assembler/disassembler.
llvm-svn: 330287
Hint to hardware to move the cache line containing the
address to a more distant level of the cache without
writing back to memory.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45256
llvm-svn: 329992
Similar to the wbinvd instruction, except this
one does not invalidate caches. Ring 0 only.
The encoding matches a wbinvd instruction with
an F3 prefix.
Reviewers: craig.topper, zvi, ashlykov
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43816
llvm-svn: 329847
This cleans up a number of operations that only claimed te use EFLAGS
due to using DF. But no instructions which we think of us setting EFLAGS
actually modify DF (other than things like popf) and so this needlessly
creates uses of EFLAGS that aren't really there.
In fact, DF is so restrictive it is pretty easy to model. Only STD, CLD,
and the whole-flags writes (WRFLAGS and POPF) need to model this.
I've also somewhat cleaned up some of the flag management instruction
definitions to be in the correct .td file.
Adding this extra register also uncovered a failure to use the correct
datatype to hold X86 registers, and I've corrected that as necessary
here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45154
llvm-svn: 329673
These both use a 16-bit load, but one used loadi16_anyext and the other used extloadi32i16. The only difference between them is that loadi16_anyext checked that the load was at least 2 byte aligned and non-volatile. But the alignment doesn't matter here. Just use extloadi32i16 for both.
llvm-svn: 329154
The memory form of these instructions only read an input from memory. They don't have any register operands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44836
llvm-svn: 328828
These instructions have the memory operand before the register operand. So we need to put ReadDefault for all the load ops first. Then the ReadAfterLd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44838
llvm-svn: 328823
Give the bit count instructions their own scheduler classes instead of forcing them into existing classes.
These were mostly overridden anyway, but I had to add in costs from Agner for silvermont and znver1 and the Fam16h SoG for btver2 (Jaguar).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44879
llvm-svn: 328566
1. Given that we already have a classification bucket with 'nop' in the name,
that's where 'nop' belongs. Right now, it's only used for prefix bytes and 'pause'.
2. Make the latency of this class '1' for Jaguar to tell the scheduler (and presumably
llvm-mca) how to model the resource requirements better even though a nop has no
dependencies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44608
llvm-svn: 327853
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
We can't fold a large immediate into a 64-bit operation. But if we know we're only operating on a single bit we can use the bit instructions.
For now only do this for optsize.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37418
llvm-svn: 325287
The bound instruction does not have reversed operands in gas.
Fixes PR27653.
Patch by Maya Madhavan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43243
llvm-svn: 325178
Expand existing SchedRW to encompass these like it did for the other memory offset movs - added comments to closing braces to keep track of def scopes.
We only tagged it with the itinerary class, so completeness checks were erroneously passed (PR35639).
llvm-svn: 324910
Previously we just emitted this as a MOV8rm which would likely get folded during the peephole pass anyway. This just makes it explicit earlier.
The gpr-to-mask.ll test changed because the kaddb instruction has no memory form.
llvm-svn: 324860
Some of the NOREX instructions are used in 32-bit mode making this printing confusing. It also doesn't provide a lot of value since you can see the h-register being used by the instruction.
llvm-svn: 323174
Summary:
First, we need to explain the core of the vulnerability. Note that this
is a very incomplete description, please see the Project Zero blog post
for details:
https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2018/01/reading-privileged-memory-with-side.html
The basis for branch target injection is to direct speculative execution
of the processor to some "gadget" of executable code by poisoning the
prediction of indirect branches with the address of that gadget. The
gadget in turn contains an operation that provides a side channel for
reading data. Most commonly, this will look like a load of secret data
followed by a branch on the loaded value and then a load of some
predictable cache line. The attacker then uses timing of the processors
cache to determine which direction the branch took *in the speculative
execution*, and in turn what one bit of the loaded value was. Due to the
nature of these timing side channels and the branch predictor on Intel
processors, this allows an attacker to leak data only accessible to
a privileged domain (like the kernel) back into an unprivileged domain.
The goal is simple: avoid generating code which contains an indirect
branch that could have its prediction poisoned by an attacker. In many
cases, the compiler can simply use directed conditional branches and
a small search tree. LLVM already has support for lowering switches in
this way and the first step of this patch is to disable jump-table
lowering of switches and introduce a pass to rewrite explicit indirectbr
sequences into a switch over integers.
However, there is no fully general alternative to indirect calls. We
introduce a new construct we call a "retpoline" to implement indirect
calls in a non-speculatable way. It can be thought of loosely as
a trampoline for indirect calls which uses the RET instruction on x86.
Further, we arrange for a specific call->ret sequence which ensures the
processor predicts the return to go to a controlled, known location. The
retpoline then "smashes" the return address pushed onto the stack by the
call with the desired target of the original indirect call. The result
is a predicted return to the next instruction after a call (which can be
used to trap speculative execution within an infinite loop) and an
actual indirect branch to an arbitrary address.
On 64-bit x86 ABIs, this is especially easily done in the compiler by
using a guaranteed scratch register to pass the target into this device.
For 32-bit ABIs there isn't a guaranteed scratch register and so several
different retpoline variants are introduced to use a scratch register if
one is available in the calling convention and to otherwise use direct
stack push/pop sequences to pass the target address.
This "retpoline" mitigation is fully described in the following blog
post: https://support.google.com/faqs/answer/7625886
We also support a target feature that disables emission of the retpoline
thunk by the compiler to allow for custom thunks if users want them.
These are particularly useful in environments like kernels that
routinely do hot-patching on boot and want to hot-patch their thunk to
different code sequences. They can write this custom thunk and use
`-mretpoline-external-thunk` *in addition* to `-mretpoline`. In this
case, on x86-64 thu thunk names must be:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_r11
```
or on 32-bit:
```
__llvm_external_retpoline_eax
__llvm_external_retpoline_ecx
__llvm_external_retpoline_edx
__llvm_external_retpoline_push
```
And the target of the retpoline is passed in the named register, or in
the case of the `push` suffix on the top of the stack via a `pushl`
instruction.
There is one other important source of indirect branches in x86 ELF
binaries: the PLT. These patches also include support for LLD to
generate PLT entries that perform a retpoline-style indirection.
The only other indirect branches remaining that we are aware of are from
precompiled runtimes (such as crt0.o and similar). The ones we have
found are not really attackable, and so we have not focused on them
here, but eventually these runtimes should also be replicated for
retpoline-ed configurations for completeness.
For kernels or other freestanding or fully static executables, the
compiler switch `-mretpoline` is sufficient to fully mitigate this
particular attack. For dynamic executables, you must compile *all*
libraries with `-mretpoline` and additionally link the dynamic
executable and all shared libraries with LLD and pass `-z retpolineplt`
(or use similar functionality from some other linker). We strongly
recommend also using `-z now` as non-lazy binding allows the
retpoline-mitigated PLT to be substantially smaller.
When manually apply similar transformations to `-mretpoline` to the
Linux kernel we observed very small performance hits to applications
running typical workloads, and relatively minor hits (approximately 2%)
even for extremely syscall-heavy applications. This is largely due to
the small number of indirect branches that occur in performance
sensitive paths of the kernel.
When using these patches on statically linked applications, especially
C++ applications, you should expect to see a much more dramatic
performance hit. For microbenchmarks that are switch, indirect-, or
virtual-call heavy we have seen overheads ranging from 10% to 50%.
However, real-world workloads exhibit substantially lower performance
impact. Notably, techniques such as PGO and ThinLTO dramatically reduce
the impact of hot indirect calls (by speculatively promoting them to
direct calls) and allow optimized search trees to be used to lower
switches. If you need to deploy these techniques in C++ applications, we
*strongly* recommend that you ensure all hot call targets are statically
linked (avoiding PLT indirection) and use both PGO and ThinLTO. Well
tuned servers using all of these techniques saw 5% - 10% overhead from
the use of retpoline.
We will add detailed documentation covering these components in
subsequent patches, but wanted to make the core functionality available
as soon as possible. Happy for more code review, but we'd really like to
get these patches landed and backported ASAP for obvious reasons. We're
planning to backport this to both 6.0 and 5.0 release streams and get
a 5.0 release with just this cherry picked ASAP for distros and vendors.
This patch is the work of a number of people over the past month: Eric, Reid,
Rui, and myself. I'm mailing it out as a single commit due to the time
sensitive nature of landing this and the need to backport it. Huge thanks to
everyone who helped out here, and everyone at Intel who helped out in
discussions about how to craft this. Also, credit goes to Paul Turner (at
Google, but not an LLVM contributor) for much of the underlying retpoline
design.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, ruiu, craig.topper, DavidKreitzer
Subscribers: sanjoy, emaste, mcrosier, mgorny, mehdi_amini, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41723
llvm-svn: 323155
This adds a new instrinsic to support the rdpid instruction. The implementation is a bit weird because the intrinsic is defined as always returning 32-bits, but the assembler support thinks the instruction produces a 64-bit register in 64-bit mode. But really it zeros the upper 32 bits. So I had to add separate patterns where 64-bit mode uses an extract_subreg.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42205
llvm-svn: 322910
Prior to this we had a separate instruction and register class that excluded eax to prevent matching the instruction that would encode with 0x90.
This patch changes this to just use an InstAlias to force xchgl %eax, %eax to use XCHG32rr instruction in 64-bit mode. This gets rid of the separate instruction and register class.
llvm-svn: 322532
Without a register with a size being mentioned the instruction is ambiguous in at&t syntax. With Intel syntax the memory operation caries a size that can be used to disambiguate.
llvm-svn: 322356
While the suffix isn't required to disambiguate the instructions, it is required in order to parse the instructions when the suffix is specified in order to match the GNU assembler.
llvm-svn: 322354
We don't do fine grained feature control like this on features prior to AVX512.
We do still have checks in place in the assembly parser itself that prevents %zmm references or %xmm16-31 from being parsed without at least -mattr=avx512f. Same for rounding control and mask operands. That will prevent the table matcher from matching for any instructions that need those features and that's probably good enough.
llvm-svn: 321947
This behavior existed to work with an old version of the gnu assembler on MacOS that only accepted this form. Newer versions of GNU assembler and the current LLVM derived version of the assembler on MacOS support movq as well.
llvm-svn: 321898
Previously prefetch was only considered legal if sse was enabled, but it should be supported with 3dnow as well.
The prfchw flag now imply at least some form of prefetch without the write hint is available, either the sse or 3dnow version. This is true even if 3dnow and sse are explicitly disabled.
Similarly prefetchwt1 feature implies availability of prefetchw and the the prefetcht0/1/2/nta instructions. This way we can support _MM_HINT_ET0 using prefetchw and _MM_HINT_ET1 with prefetchwt1. And its assumed that if we have levels for the write hint we would have levels for the non-write hint, thus why we enable the sse prefetch instructions.
I believe this behavior is consistent with gcc. I've updated the prefetch.ll to test all of these combinations.
llvm-svn: 321335
The asm parser wasn't preventing these from being accepted in 32-bit mode. Instructions that use a GR64 register are protected by the parser rejecting the register in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320846
Tagged as IMUL instructions for a reasonable approximation (ALU tends to be a lot faster) - POPCNT is currently tagged as FAdd which I think should be replaced with IMUL as well
llvm-svn: 320051
Shadow stack solution introduces a new stack for return addresses only.
The HW has a Shadow Stack Pointer (SSP) that points to the next return address.
If we return to a different address, an exception is triggered.
The shadow stack is managed using a series of intrinsics that are introduced in this patch as well as the new register (SSP).
The intrinsics are mapped to new instruction set that implements CET mechanism.
The patch also includes initial infrastructure support for IBT.
For more information, please see the following:
https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/managed/4d/2a/control-flow-enforcement-technology-preview.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40223
Change-Id: I4daa1f27e88176be79a4ac3b4cd26a459e88fed4
llvm-svn: 318996
Summary:
These instructions zero the non-scalar part of the lower 128-bits which makes them different than the FMA3 instructions which pass through the non-scalar part of the lower 128-bits.
I've only added fmadd because we should be able to derive all other variants using operand negation in the intrinsic header like we do for AVX512.
I think there are still some missed negate folding opportunities with the FMA4 instructions in light of this behavior difference that I hadn't noticed before.
I've split the tests so that we can use different intrinsics for scalar testing between the two. I just copied the tests split the RUN lines and changed out the scalar intrinsics.
fma4-fneg-combine.ll is a new test to make sure we negate the fma4 intrinsics correctly though there are a couple TODOs in it.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39851
llvm-svn: 318984
The EVEX to VEX pass is already assuming this is true under AVX512VL. We had special patterns to use zmm instructions if VLX and F16C weren't available.
Instead just make AVX512 imply F16C to make the EVEX to VEX behavior explicitly legal and remove the extra patterns.
All known CPUs with AVX512 have F16C so this should safe for now.
llvm-svn: 317521
Summary:
INC/DEC don't update the carry flag so we need to make sure we don't try to use it.
This patch introduces new X86ISD opcodes for locked INC/DEC. Teaches lowerAtomicArithWithLOCK to emit these nodes if INC/DEC is not slow or the function is being optimized for size. An additional flag is added that allows the INC/DEC to be disabled if the caller determines that the carry flag is being requested.
The test_sub_1_cmp_1_setcc_ugt test is currently showing this bug. The other test case changes are recovering cases that were regressed in r316860.
This should fully fix PR35068 finishing the fix started in r316860.
Reviewers: RKSimon, zvi, spatel
Reviewed By: zvi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39411
llvm-svn: 316913
Andrew V. Tischenko