Summary:
Preserve MemorySSA in LoopSimplify, in the old pass manager, if the analysis is available.
Do not preserve it in the new pass manager.
Update tests.
Subscribers: nemanjai, jlebar, javed.absar, Prazek, kbarton, zzheng, jsji, llvm-commits, george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60833
llvm-svn: 360270
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358271
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358256
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
For the below case, pre-inc prep think it's a good candidate to use pre-inc for the bucket, but 64bit integer load/store update (pre-inc) instruction on Power requires the displacement field should be DS-form (4's multiple). Since it can't satisfy the constraint, we have to do some fix ups later. As below, the original load/stores could be well-form, it makes things worse.
unsigned long long result = 0;
unsigned long long foo(char *p, unsigned long long n) {
for (unsigned long long i = 0; i < n; i++) {
unsigned long long x1 = *(unsigned long long *)(p - 50000 + i);
unsigned long long x2 = *(unsigned long long *)(p - 61024 + i);
unsigned long long x3 = *(unsigned long long *)(p - 62048 + i);
unsigned long long x4 = *(unsigned long long *)(p - 64096 + i);
result *= x1 * x2 * x3 * x4;
}
return result;
}
Patch by jedilyn(Kewen Lin).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48813
--This line, and those below, will be ignored--
M lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCLoopPreIncPrep.cpp
A test/CodeGen/PowerPC/preincprep-i64-check.ll
llvm-svn: 336074
Review feedback from r328165. Split out just the one function from the
file that's used by Analysis. (As chandlerc pointed out, the original
change only moved the header and not the implementation anyway - which
was fine for the one function that was used (since it's a
template/inlined in the header) but not in general)
llvm-svn: 333954
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
This commit adds a wrapper for std::distance() which works with ranges.
As it would be a common case to write `distance(predecessors(BB))`, this
also introduces `pred_size()` and `succ_size()` helpers to make that
easier to write.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46668
llvm-svn: 332057
Remove #include of Transforms/Scalar.h from Transform/Utils to fix layering.
Transforms depends on Transforms/Utils, not the other way around. So
remove the header and the "createStripGCRelocatesPass" function
declaration (& definition) that is unused and motivated this dependency.
Move Transforms/Utils/Local.h into Analysis because it's used by
Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.cpp.
llvm-svn: 328165
Preparations to use the per-increment are sometimes done in the target
independent pass Loop Strength Reduction. We try to detect them in the PowerPC
specific pass so that they are not done twice and so that we do not add PHIs
that are not required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36736
llvm-svn: 311332
A large number of loop utility functions take a `Pass *` and reach
into it to find out which analyses to preserve. There are a number of
problems with this:
- The APIs have access to pretty well any Pass state they want, so
it's hard to tell what they may or may not do.
- Other APIs have copied these and pass around a `Pass *` even though
they don't even use it. Some of these just hand a nullptr to the API
since the callers don't even have a pass available.
- Passes in the new pass manager don't work like the current ones, so
the APIs can't be used as is there.
Instead, we should explicitly thread the analysis results that we
actually care about through these APIs. This is both simpler and more
reusable.
llvm-svn: 255669
Under most circumstances, if SCEV can simplify X-Y to a constant, then it can
also simplify Y-X to a constant. However, there is no guarantee that this is
always true, and concensus is not to consider that a correctness bug in SCEV
(although it is undesirable).
PPCLoopPreIncPrep gathers pointers used to access memory (via loads, stores and
prefetches) into buckets, where in each bucket the relative pointer offsets are
constant. We used to keep each bucket as a multimap, where SCEV's subtraction
operation was used to define the ordering predicate. Instead, use a fixed SCEV
base expression for each bucket, record the constant offsets from that base
expression, and adjust it later, if desirable, once all pointers have been
collected.
Doing it this way should be more compile-time efficient than the previous
scheme (in addition to making the implementation less sensitive to SCEV
simplification quirks).
Fixes PR25170.
llvm-svn: 252417
This change makes ScalarEvolution a stand-alone object and just produces
one from a pass as needed. Making this work well requires making the
object movable, using references instead of overwritten pointers in
a number of places, and other refactorings.
I've also wired it up to the new pass manager and added a RUN line to
a test to exercise it under the new pass manager. This includes basic
printing support much like with other analyses.
But there is a big and somewhat scary change here. Prior to this patch
ScalarEvolution was never *actually* invalidated!!! Re-running the pass
just re-wired up the various other analyses and didn't remove any of the
existing entries in the SCEV caches or clear out anything at all. This
might seem OK as everything in SCEV that can uses ValueHandles to track
updates to the values that serve as SCEV keys. However, this still means
that as we ran SCEV over each function in the module, we kept
accumulating more and more SCEVs into the cache. At the end, we would
have a SCEV cache with every value that we ever needed a SCEV for in the
entire module!!! Yowzers. The releaseMemory routine would dump all of
this, but that isn't realy called during normal runs of the pipeline as
far as I can see.
To make matters worse, there *is* actually a key that we don't update
with value handles -- there is a map keyed off of Loop*s. Because
LoopInfo *does* release its memory from run to run, it is entirely
possible to run SCEV over one function, then over another function, and
then lookup a Loop* from the second function but find an entry inserted
for the first function! Ouch.
To make matters still worse, there are plenty of updates that *don't*
trip a value handle. It seems incredibly unlikely that today GVN or
another pass that invalidates SCEV can update values in *just* such
a way that a subsequent run of SCEV will incorrectly find lookups in
a cache, but it is theoretically possible and would be a nightmare to
debug.
With this refactoring, I've fixed all this by actually destroying and
recreating the ScalarEvolution object from run to run. Technically, this
could increase the amount of malloc traffic we see, but then again it is
also technically correct. ;] I don't actually think we're suffering from
tons of malloc traffic from SCEV because if we were, the fact that we
never clear the memory would seem more likely to have come up as an
actual problem before now. So, I've made the simple fix here. If in fact
there are serious issues with too much allocation and deallocation,
I can work on a clever fix that preserves the allocations (while
clearing the data) between each run, but I'd prefer to do that kind of
optimization with a test case / benchmark that shows why we need such
cleverness (and that can test that we actually make it faster). It's
possible that this will make some things faster by making the SCEV
caches have higher locality (due to being significantly smaller) so
until there is a clear benchmark, I think the simple change is best.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12063
llvm-svn: 245193
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
When I fixed these a couple of days ago to iterate over all loops, not just
depth == 1 loops, I inadvertently made it such that we'd only look at the first
top-level loop. Make sure that we really look at all of them.
llvm-svn: 234705
This pass had the same problem as the data-prefetching pass: it was only
checking for depth == 1 loops in practice. Fix that, add some debugging
statements, and make sure that, when we grab an AddRec, it is for the loop we
expect.
llvm-svn: 234670
Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.
This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.
I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.
I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.
Test Plan:
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231740
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270
If a loop predecessor has an invoke as its terminator, and the return value
from that invoke is used to determine the loop iteration space, then we can't
insert a computation based on that value in the loop predecessor prior to the
terminator (oops). If there's such an invoke, or just no predecessor for that
matter, insert a new loop preheader.
llvm-svn: 228488
PowerPC supports pre-increment load/store instructions (except for Altivec/VSX
vector load/stores). Using these on embedded cores can be very important, but
most loops are not naturally set up to use them. We can often change that,
however, by placing loops into a non-canonical form. Generically, this means
transforming loops like this:
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
array[i] = c;
to look like this:
T *p = array[-1];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
*++p = c;
the key point is that addresses accessed are pulled into dedicated PHIs and
"pre-decremented" in the loop preheader. This allows the use of pre-increment
load/store instructions without loop peeling.
A target-specific late IR-level pass (running post-LSR), PPCLoopPreIncPrep, is
introduced to perform this transformation. I've used this code out-of-tree for
generating code for the PPC A2 for over a year. Somewhat to my surprise,
running the test suite + externals on a P7 with this transformation enabled
showed no performance regressions, and one speedup:
External/SPEC/CINT2006/483.xalancbmk/483.xalancbmk
-2.32514% +/- 1.03736%
So I'm going to enable it on everything for now. I was surprised by this
because, on the POWER cores, these pre-increment load/store instructions are
cracked (and, thus, harder to schedule effectively). But seeing no regressions,
and feeling that it is generally easier to split instructions apart late than
it is to combine them late, this might be the better approach regardless.
In the future, we might want to integrate this functionality into LSR (but
currently LSR does not create new PHI nodes, so (for that and other reasons)
significant work would need to be done).
llvm-svn: 228328
Alina Sbirlea