This implements execute-only support for ARM code generation, which
prevents the compiler from generating data accesses to code sections.
The following changes are involved:
* Add the CodeGen option "-arm-execute-only" to the ARM code generator.
* Add the clang flag "-mexecute-only" as well as the GCC-compatible
alias "-mpure-code" to enable this option.
* When enabled, literal pools are replaced with MOVW/MOVT instructions,
with VMOV used in addition for floating-point literals. As the MOVT
instruction is required, execute-only support is only available in
Thumb mode for targets supporting ARMv8-M baseline or Thumb2.
* Jump tables are placed in data sections when in execute-only mode.
* The execute-only text section is assigned section ID 0, and is
marked as unreadable with the SHF_ARM_PURECODE flag with symbol 'y'.
This also overrides selection of ELF sections for globals.
llvm-svn: 289784
Summary:
This fixes an issue with MachineBlockPlacement due to a badly timed call
to `analyzeBranch` with `AllowModify` set to true. The timeline is as
follows:
1. `MachineBlockPlacement::maybeTailDuplicateBlock` calls
`TailDup.shouldTailDuplicate` on its argument, which in turn calls
`analyzeBranch` with `AllowModify` set to true.
2. This `analyzeBranch` call edits the terminator sequence of the block
based on the physical layout of the machine function, turning an
unanalyzable non-fallthrough block to a unanalyzable fallthrough
block. Normally MBP bails out of rearranging such blocks, but this
block was unanalyzable non-fallthrough (and thus rearrangeable) the
first time MBP looked at it, and so it goes ahead and decides where
it should be placed in the function.
3. When placing this block MBP fails to analyze and thus update the
block in keeping with the new physical layout.
Concretely, before (1) we have something like:
```
LBL0:
< unknown terminator op that may branch to LBL1 >
jmp LBL1
LBL1:
... A
LBL2:
... B
```
In (2), analyze branch simplifies this to
```
LBL0:
< unknown terminator op that may branch to LBL2 >
;; jmp LBL1 <- redundant jump removed
LBL1:
... A
LBL2:
... B
```
In (3), MachineBlockPlacement goes ahead with its plan of putting LBL2
after the first block since that is profitable.
```
LBL0:
< unknown terminator op that may branch to LBL2 >
;; jmp LBL1 <- redundant jump
LBL2:
... B
LBL1:
... A
```
and the program now has incorrect behavior (we no longer fall-through
from `LBL0` to `LBL1`) because MBP can no longer edit LBL0.
There are several possible solutions, but I went with removing the teeth
off of the `analyzeBranch` calls in TailDuplicator. That makes thinking
about the result of these calls easier, and breaks nothing in the lit
test suite.
I've also added some bookkeeping to the MachineBlockPlacement pass and
used that to write an assert that would have caught this.
Reviewers: chandlerc, gberry, MatzeB, iteratee
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27783
llvm-svn: 289764
Most of the PowerPC64 code generation for the ELF ABI is already PIC.
There are four main exceptions:
(1) Constant pointer arrays etc. should in writeable sections.
(2) The TOC restoration NOP after a call is needed for all global
symbols. While GNU ld has a workaround for questionable GCC self-calls,
we trigger the checks for calls from COMDAT sections as they cross input
sections and are therefore not considered self-calls. The current
decision is questionable and suboptimal, but outside the scope of the
change.
(3) TLS access can not use the initial-exec model.
(4) Jump tables should use relative addresses. Note that the current
encoding doesn't work for the large code model, but it is more compact
than the default for any non-trivial jump table. Improving this is again
beyond the scope of this change.
At least (1) and (3) are assumptions made in target-independent code and
introducing additional hooks is a bit messy. Testing with clang shows
that a -fPIC binary is 600KB smaller than the corresponding -fno-pic
build. Separate testing from improved jump table encodings would explain
only about 100KB or so. The rest is expected to be a result of more
aggressive immediate forming for -fno-pic, where the -fPIC binary just
uses TOC entries.
This change brings the LLVM output in line with the GCC output, other
PPC64 compilers like XLC on AIX are known to produce PIC by default
as well. The relocation model can still be provided explicitly, i.e.
when using MCJIT.
One test case for case (1) is included, other test cases with relocation
mode sensitive behavior are wired to static for now. They will be
reviewed and adjusted separately.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26566
llvm-svn: 289743
The original motivation for this patch comes from wanting to canonicalize
more IR to selects and also canonicalizing min/max.
If we're going to do that, we need more backend fixups to undo select codegen
when simpler ops will do. I chose AArch64 for the tests because that shows the
difference in the simplest way. This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31175
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27489
llvm-svn: 289738
Given that INSERT_VECTOR_ELT operates on D registers anyway, combining
64-bit vectors into a 128-bit vector is basically free. Therefore, try
to split BUILD_VECTOR nodes before giving up and lowering them to a series
of INSERT_VECTOR_ELT instructions. Sometimes this allows dramatically
better lowerings; see testcases for examples. Inspired by similar code
in the x86 backend for AVX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27624
llvm-svn: 289706
Currently, there are substantial problems forming vld1_dup even if the
VDUP survives legalization. The lack of an actual node
leads to terrible results: not only can we not form post-increment vld1_dup
instructions, but we form scalar pre-increment and post-increment
loads which force the loaded value into a GPR. This patch fixes that
by combining the vdup+load into an ARMISD node before DAGCombine
messes it up.
Also includes a crash fix for vld2_dup (see testcase @vld2dupi8_postinc_variable).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27694
llvm-svn: 289703
Retrying after fixing after removing load-store factoring through
token factors in favor of improved token factor operand pruning
Simplify Consecutive Merge Store Candidate Search
Now that address aliasing is much less conservative, push through
simplified store merging search which only checks for parallel stores
through the chain subgraph. This is cleaner as the separation of
non-interfering loads/stores from the store-merging logic.
Whem merging stores, search up the chain through a single load, and
finds all possible stores by looking down from through a load and a
TokenFactor to all stores visited. This improves the quality of the
output SelectionDAG and generally the output CodeGen (with some
exceptions).
Additional Minor Changes:
1. Finishes removing unused AliasLoad code
2. Unifies the the chain aggregation in the merged stores across
code paths
3. Re-add the Store node to the worklist after calling
SimplifyDemandedBits.
4. Increase GatherAllAliasesMaxDepth from 6 to 18. That number is
arbitrary, but seemed sufficient to not cause regressions in
tests.
This finishes the change Matt Arsenault started in r246307 and
jyknight's original patch.
Many tests required some changes as memory operations are now
reorderable. Some tests relying on the order were changed to use
volatile memory operations
Noteworthy tests:
CodeGen/AArch64/argument-blocks.ll -
It's not entirely clear what the test_varargs_stackalign test is
supposed to be asserting, but the new code looks right.
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-memset-inline.lli -
CodeGen/AArch64/arm64-stur.ll -
CodeGen/ARM/memset-inline.ll -
The backend now generates *worse* code due to store merging
succeeding, as we do do a 16-byte constant-zero store efficiently.
CodeGen/AArch64/merge-store.ll -
Improved, but there still seems to be an extraneous vector insert
from an element to itself?
CodeGen/PowerPC/ppc64-align-long-double.ll -
Worse code emitted in this case, due to the improved store->load
forwarding.
CodeGen/X86/dag-merge-fast-accesses.ll -
CodeGen/X86/MergeConsecutiveStores.ll -
CodeGen/X86/stores-merging.ll -
CodeGen/Mips/load-store-left-right.ll -
Restored correct merging of non-aligned stores
CodeGen/AMDGPU/promote-alloca-stored-pointer-value.ll -
Improved. Correctly merges buffer_store_dword calls
CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-triv-disjoint-mem-access.ll -
Improved. Sidesteps loading a stored value and
merges two stores
CodeGen/X86/pr18023.ll -
This test has been removed, as it was asserting incorrect
behavior. Non-volatile stores *CAN* be moved past volatile loads,
and now are.
CodeGen/X86/vector-idiv.ll -
CodeGen/X86/vector-lzcnt-128.ll -
It's basically impossible to tell what these tests are actually
testing. But, looks like the code got better due to the memory
operations being recognized as non-aliasing.
CodeGen/X86/win32-eh.ll -
Both loads of the securitycookie are now merged.
Reviewers: arsenm, hfinkel, tstellarAMD, jyknight, nhaehnle
Subscribers: wdng, nhaehnle, nemanjai, arsenm, weimingz, niravd, RKSimon, aemerson, qcolombet, dsanders, resistor, tstellarAMD, t.p.northover, spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14834
llvm-svn: 289659
Generalize sdiv/udiv/srem/urem combines using APInt::isPowerOf2, which only works for const/splat-const values, to call SelectionDAG::isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo instead which recognises many more cases.
Added a DAGCombiner::BuildLogBase2 helper since PowerOf2 combines often involve taking the log2 of such a value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27714
llvm-svn: 289654
adding new optimization opportunity by adding new X86ISelLowering pattern. The test case was shown in https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30945.
Test explanation:
Select gets three arguments mask, op and op2. In this case, the Mask is a result of ICMP. The ICMP instruction compares (with equal operand) the zero initializer vector and the result of the first ICMP.
In general, The result of "cmp eq, op1, zero initializers" is "not(op1)" where op1 is a mask. By rearranging of the two arguments inside the Select instruction, we can get the same result. Without the necessary of the middle phase ("cmp eq, op1, zero initializers").
Missed optimization opportunity:
vpcmpled %zmm0, %zmm1, %k0
knotw %k0, %k1
can be combine to
vpcmpgtd %zmm0, %zmm2, %k1
Reviewers:
1. delena
2. igorb
Commited after check all
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27160
llvm-svn: 289653
This change aims to unify and correct our logic for when we need to allow for
the possibility of the linker adding a TOC restoration instruction after a
call. This comes up in two contexts:
1. When determining tail-call eligibility. If we make a tail call (i.e.
directly branch to a function) then there is no place for the linker to add
a TOC restoration.
2. When determining when we need to add a nop instruction after a call.
Likewise, if there is a possibility that the linker might need to add a
TOC restoration after a call, then we need to put a nop after the call
(the bl instruction).
First problem: We were using similar, but different, logic to decide (1) and
(2). This is just wrong. Both the resideInSameModule function (used when
determining tail-call eligibility) and the isLocalCall function (used when
deciding if the post-call nop is needed) were supposed to be determining the
same underlying fact (i.e. might a TOC restoration be needed after the call).
The same logic should be used in both places.
Second problem: The logic in both places was wrong. We only know that two
functions will share the same TOC when both functions come from the same
section of the same object. Otherwise the linker might cause the functions to
use different TOC base addresses (unless the multi-TOC linker option is
disabled, in which case only shared-library boundaries are relevant). There are
a number of factors that can cause functions to be placed in different sections
or come from different objects (-ffunction-sections, explicitly-specified
section names, COMDAT, weak linkage, etc.). All of these need to be checked.
The existing logic only checked properties of the callee, but the properties of
the caller must also be checked (for example, calling from a function in a
COMDAT section means calling between sections).
There was a conceptual error in the resideInSameModule function in that it
allowed tail calls to functions with weak linkage and protected/hidden
visibility. While protected/hidden visibility does prevent the function
implementation from being replaced at runtime (via interposition), it does not
prevent the linker from using an alternate implementation at link time (i.e.
using some strong definition to replace the provided weak one during linking).
If this happens, then we're still potentially looking at a required TOC
restoration upon return.
Otherwise, in general, the post-call nop is needed wherever ELF interposition
needs to be supported. We don't currently support ELF interposition at the IR
level (see http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107625.html
for more information), and I don't think we should try to make it appear to
work in the backend in spite of that fact. This will yield subtle bugs if
interposition is attempted. As a result, regardless of whether we're in PIC
mode, we don't assume that we need to add the nop to support the possibility of
ELF interposition. However, the necessary check is in place (i.e. calling
GV->isInterposable and TM.shouldAssumeDSOLocal) so when we have functions for
which interposition is allowed at the IR level, we'll add the nop as necessary.
In the mean time, we'll generate more tail calls and fewer nops when compiling
position-independent code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27231
llvm-svn: 289638
Follow-up to r289256, address a FIXME to avoid resetting the column
number. This reduced .debug_line by 2.6% in a RelWithDebInfo
self-build of clang.
llvm-svn: 289620
Summary:
This patch aims to generalize matching of the strided store accesses to more general masks.
The more general rule is to have consecutive accesses based on the stride:
[x, y, ... z, x+1, y+1, ...z+1, x+2, y+2, ...z+2, ...]
All elements in the masks need not form a contiguous space, there may be gaps.
As before, undefs are allowed and filled in with adjacent element loads.
Reviewers: HaoLiu, mssimpso
Subscribers: mkuper, delena, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23646
llvm-svn: 289573
This is not always behaving as expected as it turns out block live-in
lists are only correct most of the time. Still waiting for reviews on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27559 to have them correct all of the time.
See also http://llvm.org/PR31361, rdar://25117107
This reverts commit r288567.
This reverts commit r288561.
llvm-svn: 289570
We were using the correct pseudo-instruction, but because the operand's flags
weren't set correctly we still ended up emitting incorrect relocations during
MC lowering.
llvm-svn: 289566
Match a pattern where a wide type scalar value is loaded by several narrow loads and combined by shifts and ors. Fold it into a single load or a load and a bswap if the targets supports it.
Assuming little endian target:
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = a[0] | (a[1] << 8) | (a[2] << 16) | (a[3] << 24)
=>
i32 val = *((i32)a)
i8 *a = ...
i32 val = (a[0] << 24) | (a[1] << 16) | (a[2] << 8) | a[3]
=>
i32 val = BSWAP(*((i32)a))
This optimization was discussed on llvm-dev some time ago in "Load combine pass" thread. We came to the conclusion that we want to do this transformation late in the pipeline because in presence of atomic loads load widening is irreversible transformation and it might hinder other optimizations.
Eventually we'd like to support folding patterns like this where the offset has a variable and a constant part:
i32 val = a[i] | (a[i + 1] << 8) | (a[i + 2] << 16) | (a[i + 3] << 24)
Matching the pattern above is easier at SelectionDAG level since address reassociation has already happened and the fact that the loads are adjacent is clear. Understanding that these loads are adjacent at IR level would have involved looking through geps/zexts/adds while looking at the addresses.
The general scheme is to match OR expressions by recursively calculating the origin of individual bits which constitute the resulting OR value. If all the OR bits come from memory verify that they are adjacent and match with little or big endian encoding of a wider value. If so and the load of the wider type (and bswap if needed) is allowed by the target generate a load and a bswap if needed.
Reviewed By: hfinkel, RKSimon, filcab
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26149
llvm-svn: 289538
In certain cases it is possible that transient instructions such as
%reg = IMPLICIT_DEF as a single instruction in a basic block to reach
the MipsHazardSchedule pass. This patch teaches MipsHazardSchedule to
properly look through such cases.
Reviewers: vkalintiris, zoran.jovanovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27209
llvm-svn: 289529
Summary:
This pass will be used to relax instructions which use out of bounds
memory accesses to equivalent operations that can work with the
addresses.
The pass currently implements relaxation for the STDWPtrQRr instruction.
Without this pass, an assertion error would be hit in the pseudo expansion pass.
In the future, we will need to add more instructions to this pass. We can do
that on a case-by-case basic.
Reviewers: arsenm, kparzysz
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27650
llvm-svn: 289517
The general idea here is to get enough of the existing restrictions out of the way that the already existing folding logic in foldMemoryOperand can kick in for STATEPOINTs and fold references to immutable stack slots. The key changes are:
Support for folding multiple operands at once which reference the same load
Support for folding multiple loads into a single instruction
Walk all the operands of the instruction for varidic instructions (this is a bug fix!)
Once this lands, I'll post another patch which refactors the TII interface here. There's nothing actually x86 specific about the x86 code used here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24103
llvm-svn: 289510
The stack slot reuse code had a really amusing bug. We ended up only reusing a stack slot exact once (initial use + reuse) within a basic block. If we had a third statepoint to process, we ended up allocating a new set of stack slots. If we crossed a basic block boundary, the set got cleared. As a result, code which is invoke heavy doesn't see the problem, but multiple calls within a basic block does. Net result: as we optimize invokes into calls, lowering gets worse.
The root error here is that the bitmap uses by the custom allocator wasn't kept in sync. The result was that we ended up resizing the bitmap on the next statepoint (to handle the cross block case), reset the bit once, but then never reset it again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25243
llvm-svn: 289509
Power8 has MTVSRWZ but no LXSIBZX/LXSIHZX, so move 1 or 2 bytes to VSR through MTVSRWZ is much faster than store the extended value into stack and load it with LXSIWZX.
This patch fixes pr31144.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27287
llvm-svn: 289473
DWARF specifies that "line 0" really means "no appropriate source
location" in the line table. By default, use this for branch targets
and some other cases that have no specified source location, to
prevent inheriting unfortunate line numbers from physically preceding
instructions (which might be from completely unrelated source).
Updated patch allows enabling or suppressing this behavior for all
unspecified source locations.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D24180
llvm-svn: 289468
PMULDQ returns the 64-bit result of the signed multiplication of the lower 32-bits of vXi64 vector inputs, we can lower with this if the sign bits stretch that far.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27657
llvm-svn: 289426
Summary:
These intrinsic instructions are all selected from intrinsics that have well defined behavior for where the upper bits come from. It's not the same place as the lower bits.
As you can see we were suppressing load folding for these instructions in some cases. In none of the cases was the separate load helping avoid a partial dependency on the destination register. So we should just go ahead and allow the load to be folded.
Only foldMemoryOperand was suppressing folding for these. They all have patterns for folding sse_load_f32/f64 that aren't gated with OptForSize, but sse_load_f32/f64 doesn't allow 128-bit vector loads. It only allows scalar_to_vector and vzmovl of scalar loads to match. There's no reason we can't allow a 128-bit vector load to be narrowed so I would like to fix sse_load_f32/f64 to allow that. And if I do that it changes some of these same test cases to fold the load too.
Reviewers: spatel, zvi, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27611
llvm-svn: 289419
When the load node which the broadcast instruction broadcasts has multiple uses, it cannot be folded.
A fallback pattern is added to catch these cases and provide another solution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27661
llvm-svn: 289404
Summary:
This change adds some verification in the IR verifier around struct path
TBAA metadata.
Other than some basic sanity checks (e.g. we get constant integers where
we expect constant integers), this checks:
- That by the time an struct access tuple `(base-type, offset)` is
"reduced" to a scalar base type, the offset is `0`. For instance, in
C++ you can't start from, say `("struct-a", 16)`, and end up with
`("int", 4)` -- by the time the base type is `"int"`, the offset
better be zero. In particular, a variant of this invariant is needed
for `llvm::getMostGenericTBAA` to be correct.
- That there are no cycles in a struct path.
- That struct type nodes have their offsets listed in an ascending
order.
- That when generating the struct access path, you eventually reach the
access type listed in the tbaa tag node.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, chandlerc, reames, mehdi_amini, manmanren
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438
llvm-svn: 289402
We have found that -- when the selected subarchitecture has a scheduling model
and we are not optimizing for size -- the machine-instruction combiner uses a
too-simple algorithm to compute the cost of one of the two alternatives [before
and after running a combining pass on a section of code], and therefor it throws
away the combination results too often.
This fix has the potential to help any ISA with the potential to combine
instructions and for which at least one subarchitecture has a scheduling model.
As of now, this is only known to definitely affect AArch64 subarchitectures with
a scheduling model.
Regression tested on AMD64/GNU-Linux, new test case tested to fail on an
unpatched compiler and pass on a patched compiler.
Patch by Abe Skolnik and Sebastian Pop.
llvm-svn: 289399
Prakhar Bahuguna