This reverts commit 97f0c63783.
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D110684, it increased the
compile time and the binary size of clang more than 1%. I reverted
this patch first to think about a better way to do it.
In the original design, we levarage _mt intrinsics to define macros for
_m intrinsics. Such as,
```
__builtin_rvv_vadd_vv_i8m1_mt((vbool8_t)(op0), (vint8m1_t)(op1), (vint8m1_t)(op2), (vint8m1_t)(op3), (size_t)(op4), (size_t)VE_TAIL_AGNOSTIC)
```
However, we could not define generic interface for mask intrinsics any
more due to clang_builtin_alias only accepts clang builtins as its
argument.
In the example,
```
__rvv_overloaded
__attribute__((clang_builtin_alias(__builtin_rvv_vadd_vv_i8m1_mt)))
vint8m1_t vadd(vbool8_t op0, vint8m1_t op1, vint8m1_t op2, vint8m1_t
op3, size_t op4, size_t op5);
```
op5 is the tail policy argument. When users want to use vadd generic
interface for masked vector add, they need to specify tail policy in the
previous design. In this patch, we define _m intrinsics as clang
builtins to solve the problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110684
Add the tail policy argument to Clang builtins. There
are two policies for tail elements. Tail agnostic means users do not
care about the values in the tail elements and tail undisturbed means
the values in the tail elements need to be kept after the operation. In
order to let users control the tail policy, we add an additional
argument at the end of the argument list.
For unmasked operations, we have no maskedoff and the tail policy is
always tail agnostic. If users want to keep tail elements under unmasked
operations, they could use all one mask in the masked operations to do
it. So, we only add the additional argument for masked operations for
most cases. There are exceptions listed below.
In this patch, we do not handle the following cases to reduce the
complexity of the patch. There could be two separate patches for them.
Use dest argument to control tail policy
vmerge.vvm/vmerge.vxm/vmerge.vim (add _t builtins with additional dest
argument)
vfmerge.vfm (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.v (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.x (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vmv.v.i (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vfmv.v.f (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
vadc.vvm/vadc.vxm/vadc.vim (add _t builtins with additional dest
argument)
vsbc.vvm/vsbc.vxm (add _t builtins with additional dest argument)
Always has tail argument for masked/unmasked intrinsics
Vector Single-Width Integer Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt
builtins)
Vector Widening Integer Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t and _mt
builtins)
Vector Single-Width Floating-Point Fused Multiply-Add Instructions (add
_t and _mt builtins)
Vector Widening Floating-Point Fused Multiply-Add Instructions (add _t
and _mt builtins)
Vector Reduction Operations (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Slideup Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Vector Slidedown Instructions (add _t and _mt builtins)
Discussion: https://github.com/riscv/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/101
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109322
This patch makes the builtin operand order match the C operand order
for all intrinsics. With this we can use clang_builtin_alias for
all overloaded intrinsics.
This should further reduce the test time for vector intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101700
We only apply `clang_builtin_alias` to non-masked builtins.
Masked builtins could not use `clang_builtin_alias` because the
operand order is different between overloaded intrinsics and builtins.
A bunch of test cases need to be updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100658
We had verified the correctness of all intrinsics in downstream, so
dropping the assembly tests to decrease the check-clang time.
It would remove 1/3 of the RUN lines.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99151#2654154 mentions why we need to have
the ASM tests before.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100617
1. Rename RVVBinBuiltin to RVVOutputOp1Builtin because it is not related
to the number of operand.
2. Add RVV Integer instuctions which use RVVOutputOp1Builtin.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <rofirrim@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99524
Hsiangkai Wang