Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Andy Gibbs fcc699aee8 Extended VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to also verify source file for diagnostic.
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file.  Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.

This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers.  Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:

// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}

This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated.  The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic.  "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think!  The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.

The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified.  Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.

This closes out PR15613.

llvm-svn: 179677
2013-04-17 08:06:46 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 57756eabc9 When performing typo correction, look through the set of known
identifiers to determine good typo-correction candidates. Once we've
identified those candidates, we perform name lookup on each of them
and the consider the results. 

This optimization makes typo correction > 2x faster on a benchmark
example using a single typo (NSstring) in a tiny file that includes
Cocoa.h from a precompiled header, since we are deserializing far less
information now during typo correction.

There is a semantic change here, which is interesting. The presence of
a similarly-named entity that is not visible can now affect typo
correction. This is both good (you won't get weird corrections if the
thing you wanted isn't in scope) and bad (you won't get good
corrections if there is a similarly-named-but-completely-unrelated
thing). Time will tell whether it was a good choice or not.

llvm-svn: 116528
2010-10-14 22:11:03 +00:00