Summary:
Add call site location info into inline remarks so we can differentiate inline sites.
This can be useful for inliner tuning. We can also reconstruct full hierarchical inline
tree from parsing such remarks. The messege of inline remark is also tweaked so we can
differentiate SampleProfileLoader inline from CGSCC inline.
Reviewers: wmi, davidxl, hoy
Subscribers: hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82213
- CodeGen/flatten.c will fail under new PM becausec the new PM AlwaysInliner
seems to intentionally inline functions but not call sites marked with
alwaysinline (D23299)
- Tests that check remarks happen to check them for the inliner which is not
turned on at O0. These tests just check that remarks work, but we can make
separate tests for the new PM with -O1 so we can turn on the inliner and
check the remarks with minimal changes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62225
llvm-svn: 363846
InlineCost's isInlineViable() is changed to return InlineResult
instead of bool. This provides messages for failure reasons and
allows to get more specific messages for cases where callsites
are not viable for inlining.
Reviewed By: xbolva00, anemet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57089
llvm-svn: 352849
Summary:
Optimization remark format is slightly changed by LLVM patch D49412.
Two tests are fixed with expected messages changed.
Frankly speaking I have not tested this change yet. I will test when manage to setup the project.
Reviewers: xbolva00
Reviewed By: xbolva00
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50241
llvm-svn: 338971
The driver-based test is still not identical to the front-end line, remove the
hotness threshold from there and add a new front-end based test with
threshold.
llvm-svn: 319578
1. Require hotness on all remark lines with -verify.
3. Fix the samplePGO file to actually produce hotness on each line.
The second remark has hotness 60 rather 30 which I don't quite understand but
testing this is strictly better than before. It also unblocks the commit of
D40678.
llvm-svn: 319577
A RUN line was referring to the previous RUN line but a new test was added in
between them. Just reorder the lines.
Note this still does not completely fix this the brokenness of the comment as
the driver-based test gained a new hotness-threshold argument in r306948 but
I'll fix that is a separate commit.
llvm-svn: 319576
Summary:
Un-revert https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868, but with a slight tweak to the
documentation to fix an error -- I had used the wrong syntax for a link.
llvm-svn: 306948
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
Add a Clang frontend option to enable optimization remark hotness
thresholds, which were added to LLVM in https://reviews.llvm.org/D34867.
This prevents diagnostics that do not meet a minimum hotness
threshold from being output. When generating optimization remarks for large
codebases with a ton of cold code paths, this option can be used
to limit the optimization remark output at a reasonable size.
Discussion of this change can be read here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/114377.html
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl, hfinkel
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34868
llvm-svn: 306945
Summary:
Prior to this change, using `-fdiagnostics-show-hotness` with a sampling
profile specified via `-fprofile-sample-use=` would result in the Clang
frontend emitting a warning: "argument '-fdiagnostics-show-hotness' requires
profile-guided optimization information". Of course, a sampling profile
*is* profile-guided optimization information, so the warning is misleading.
Furthermore, despite the warning, hotness was displayed based on the data in
the sampling profile.
Prevent the warning from being emitted when a sampling profile is used, and
add a test that verifies this.
Reviewers: anemet, davidxl
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: danielcdh, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34082
llvm-svn: 306079
Original commit message:
Add -fdiagnostics-show-hotness
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281293
Summary:
I've recently added the ability for optimization remarks to include the
hotness of the corresponding code region. This uses PGO and allows
filtering of the optimization remarks by relevance. The idea was first
discussed here:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/98334
The general goal is to produce a YAML file with the remarks. Then, an
external tool could dynamically filter these by hotness and perhaps by
other things.
That said it makes sense to also expose this at the more basic level
where we just include the hotness info with each optimization remark.
For example, in D22694, the clang flag was pretty useful to measure the
overhead of the additional analyses required to include hotness.
(Without the flag we don't even run the analyses.)
For the record, Hal has already expressed support for the idea of this
patch on IRC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23284
llvm-svn: 281276
Wenlei He