normal expression, and change Evaluate and IRGen to evaluate it like a
normal expression. This simplifies the code significantly, and fixes
PR3396.
llvm-svn: 65622
only from a function definition (that does not have a prototype) are
only used to determine the compatible with other declarations of that
same function. In particular, when referencing the function we pretend
as if it does not have a prototype. Implement this behavior, which
fixes PR3626.
llvm-svn: 65460
external declarations to also support external variable
declarations. Unified the code for these two cases into two new
subroutines.
Note that we fail to diagnose cases like the one Neil pointed
out, where a visible non-external declaration hides an external
declaration by the same name. That will require some reshuffling of
name lookup.
llvm-svn: 65385
that declaration to global scope so that it can be found from other
scopes. This allows us to diagnose redeclaration errors for external
declarations across scopes. We also warn when name lookup finds such
an out-of-scope declaration. This is part of <rdar://problem/6127293>;
we'll also need to do the same thing for variables.
llvm-svn: 65373
- When we are declaring a function in local scope, we can merge with
a visible declaration from an outer scope if that declaration
refers to an entity with linkage. This behavior now works in C++
and properly ignores entities without linkage.
- Diagnose the use of "static" on a function declaration in local
scope.
- Diagnose the declaration of a static function after a non-static
declaration of the same function.
- Propagate the storage specifier to a function declaration from a
prior declaration (PR3425)
- Don't name-mangle "main"
llvm-svn: 65360
assertion when the ivars and method list was reset into the existing
interface. To fix this, mark decls as invalid when they are redefined,
and don't insert ivars/methods into invalid decls.
llvm-svn: 65340
helper isConstantInitializer) to check whether an initializer is
constant. This passes tests, but it's possible that it'll cause
regressions with real-world code.
Future work:
1. The diagnostics obtained this way are lower quality at the moment;
some work both here and in Evaluate is needed for accurate diagnostics.
2. We probably need some extra code when we're in -pedantic mode so we
can strictly enforce the rules in C99 6.6p7.
3. Dead code cleanup (this should wait until after 2, because we might
want to re-use some of the code).
llvm-svn: 65265
required to actually be an error for correctness. The attached testcase
now gives an error instead of mysteriously crashing.
Now, it's possible we actually want to support the given usage, but I
haven't looked at the relevant code closely.
llvm-svn: 65253
This prevents emitting diagnostics which are almost certainly useless.
(Note that the test is checking that we emit only one diagnostic.)
llvm-svn: 65101
information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
llvm-svn: 65081
(as GCC does), except when we've performed overload resolution and
found an unavailable function: in this case, we actually error.
Merge the checking of unavailable functions with the checking for
deprecated functions. This unifies a bit of code, and makes sure that
we're checking for unavailable functions in the right places. Also,
this check can cause an error. We may, eventually, want an option to
make "unavailable" warnings into errors.
Implement much of the logic needed for C++0x deleted functions, which
are effectively the same as "unavailable" functions (but always cause
an error when referenced). However, we don't have the syntax to
specify deleted functions yet :)
llvm-svn: 64955
and escaped newlines don't throw off the offset computation.
On this testcase:
printf("abc\
def"
"%*d", (unsigned) 1, 1);
Before:
t.m:5:5: warning: field width should have type 'int', but argument has type 'unsigned int'
def"
^
after:
t.m:6:12: warning: field width should have type 'int', but argument has type 'unsigned int'
"%*d", (unsigned) 1, 1);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
llvm-svn: 64930
any named parameters, e.g., this is accepted in C:
void f(...) __attribute__((overloadable));
although this would be rejected:
void f(...);
To do this, moved the checking of the "ellipsis without any named
arguments" condition from the parser into Sema (where it belongs anyway).
llvm-svn: 64902
to do in this area, since there are other places that reference
FunctionDecls.
Don't allow "overloadable" functions (in C) to be declared without a
prototype.
llvm-svn: 64897
functions, so if we're declaring a static we should implicitly declare
a library function by the same name (e.g., malloc, strdup). Fixes PR3592.
llvm-svn: 64736
- If a declaration is an invalid redeclaration of an existing name,
complain about the invalid redeclaration then avoid adding it to
the AST (we can still parse the definition or initializer, if any).
- If the declaration is invalid but there is no prior declaration
with that name, introduce the invalid declaration into the AST
(for later error recovery).
- If the declaration is an invalid redeclaration of a builtin that
starts with __builtin_, we produce an error and drop the
redeclaration. If it is an invalid redeclaration of a library
builtin (e.g., malloc, printf), warn (don't error!) and drop the
redeclaration.
If a user attempts to define a builtin, produce an error and (if it's
a library builtin like malloc) suggest -ffreestanding.
This addresses <rdar://problem/6097585> and PR2892. However, PR3588 is
still going to cause some problems when builtins are redeclared
without a prototype.
llvm-svn: 64639
about, whether they are builtins or not. Use this to add the
appropriate "format" attribute to NSLog, NSLogv, asprintf, and
vasprintf, and to translate builtin attributes (from Builtins.def)
into actual attributes on the function declaration.
Use the "printf" format attribute on function declarations to
determine whether we should do format string checking, rather than
looking at an ad hoc list of builtins and "known" function names.
Be a bit more careful about when we consider a function a "builtin" in
C++.
llvm-svn: 64561
1) implement parser and sema support for reading and verifying attribute(warnunusedresult).
2) rename hasLocalSideEffect to isUnusedResultAWarning, inverting the sense
of its result.
3) extend isUnusedResultAWarning to directly return the loc and range
info that should be reported to the user. Make it substantially more
precise in some cases than what was previously reported.
4) teach isUnusedResultAWarning about CallExpr to decls that are
pure/const/warnunusedresult, fixing a fixme.
5) change warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type to not pass in english strings, instead,
pass in integers and use %select.
llvm-svn: 64543
we can define builtins such as fprintf, vfprintf, and
__builtin___fprintf_chk. Give a nice error message when we need to
implicitly declare a function like fprintf.
llvm-svn: 64526
printf-like functions, both builtin functions and those in the
C library. The function-call checker now queries this attribute do
determine if we have a printf-like function, rather than scanning
through the list of "known functions IDs". However, there are 5
functions they are not yet "builtins", so the function-call checker
handles them specifically still:
- fprintf and vfprintf: the builtins mechanism cannot (yet)
express FILE* arguments, so these can't be encoded.
- NSLog: the builtins mechanism cannot (yet) express NSString*
arguments, so this (and NSLogv) can't be encoded.
- asprintf and vasprintf: these aren't part of the C99 standard
library, so we really shouldn't be defining them as builtins in
the general case (and we don't seem to have the machinery to make
them builtins only on certain targets and depending on whether
extensions are enabled).
llvm-svn: 64512
etc.) when we perform name lookup on them. This ensures that we
produce the correct signature for these functions, which has two
practical impacts:
1) When we're supporting the "implicit function declaration" feature
of C99, these functions will be implicitly declared with the right
signature rather than as a function returning "int" with no
prototype. See PR3541 for the reason why this is important (hint:
GCC always predeclares these functions).
2) If users attempt to redeclare one of these library functions with
an incompatible signature, we produce a hard error.
This patch does a little bit of work to give reasonable error
messages. For example, when we hit case #1 we complain that we're
implicitly declaring this function with a specific signature, and then
we give a note that asks the user to include the appropriate header
(e.g., "please include <stdlib.h> or explicitly declare 'malloc'"). In
case #2, we show the type of the implicit builtin that was incorrectly
declared, so the user can see the problem. We could do better here:
for example, when displaying this latter error message we say
something like:
'strcpy' was implicitly declared here with type 'char *(char *, char
const *)'
but we should really print out a fake code line showing the
declaration, like this:
'strcpy' was implicitly declared here as:
char *strcpy(char *, char const *)
This would also be good for printing built-in candidates with C++
operator overloading.
The set of C library functions supported by this patch includes all
functions from the C99 specification's <stdlib.h> and <string.h> that
(a) are predefined by GCC and (b) have signatures that could cause
codegen issues if they are treated as functions with no prototype
returning and int. Future work could extend this set of functions to
other C library functions that we know about.
llvm-svn: 64504
Currently only used for 128-bit integers.
Note that we can't use the fixed-width integer types for other integer
modes without other changes because glibc headers redefines (u)int*_t
and friends using the mode attribute. For example, this means that uint64_t
has to be compatible with unsigned __attribute((mode(DI))), and
uint64_t is currently defined to long long. And I have a feeling we'll
run into issues if we try to define uint64_t as something which isn't
either long or long long.
This doesn't get the alignment right in most cases, including
the 128-bit integer case; I'll file a PR shortly. The gist of the issue
is that the targets don't really expose the information necessary to
figure out the alignment outside of the target description, so there's a
non-trivial amount of work involved in getting it working right. That
said, the alignment used is conservative, so the only issue with the
current implementation is ABI compatibility.
This makes it trivial to add some sort of "bitwidth" attribute to make
arbitrary-width integers; I'll do that in a followup.
We could also use this for stuff like the following for compatibility
with gcc, but I have a feeling it would be a better idea for clang to be
consistent between C and C++ modes rather than follow gcc's example for
C mode.
struct {unsigned long long x : 33;} x;
unsigned long long a(void) {return x.x+1;}
llvm-svn: 64434
given name in a given scope is marked as "overloadable", every
function declaration and definition with that same name and in that
same scope needs to have the "overloadable" attribute. Essentially,
the "overloadable" attribute is not part of attribute merging, so it
must be specified even for redeclarations. This keeps users from
trying to be too sneaky for their own good:
double sin(double) __attribute__((overloadable)); // too sneaky
#include <math.h>
Previously, this would have made "sin" overloadable, and therefore
given it a mangled name. Now, we get an error inside math.h when we
see a (re)declaration of "sin" that doesn't have the "overloadable"
attribute.
llvm-svn: 64414
union subobject initialization before checking whether the next
initiailizer was actually a designated initializer. This led to
spurious "excess elements in union initializer" errors. Thanks to
rdivacky for reporting the bug!
llvm-svn: 64392
to tell it that it wasn't (directly) designated. This way, we unwind
back to the explicit initializer list properly rather than getting
stuck in the wrong subobject. Fixes llvm.org/PR3519
llvm-svn: 64155
extension. The interaction with designated initializers is a
bit... interesting... but we follow GNU's lead and don't permit too
much crazy code in this area.
Also, make the "excess initializers" error message a bit more
informative.
Addresses PR2561: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2561
llvm-svn: 63785
elaborated-type-specifier declarations into outer scopes while
retaining their proper lexical scope. This way is simpler and more
consistent with the way DeclContexts work, and also fixes
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
llvm-svn: 63581
Ted Kremenek