[dcl.init.list] as is possible without generalized initializer lists or full
constant expression support, and adds a c++0x-compat warning in C++98 mode.
The FixIt currently uses a typedef's basename without qualification, which is
likely to be incorrect on some code. If it's incorrect on too much code, we
should write a function to get the string that refers to a type from a
particular context.
The warning is currently off by default. I'll fix LLVM and clang before turning
it on.
llvm-svn: 136181
Revert "For C++11, do more checking of initializer lists up-front, enabling some subset of the final functionality. C just leaves the function early. C++98 runs through the same code path, but has no changed functionality either."
This reverts commit ac420c5053d6aa41d59f782caad9e46e5baaf2c2.
llvm-svn: 135210
template<typename T> struct S { } f() { return 0; }
This case now produces a missing ';' diagnostic, since that seems like a much more likely error than an attempt to declare a function or variable in addition to the class template.
Treat this
llvm-svn: 135195
This is a first baby step towards supporting generalized initializer lists. This also removes an aggregate
test case that was just plain wrong, assuming that non-aggregates couldn't be initialized with initializer lists
in C++11 mode.
llvm-svn: 135177
throw-expressions, such that we don't consider the NRVO when the
non-volatile automatic object comes from outside the innermost try
scope (C++0x [class.copymove]p13). In C++98/03, our ASTs were
incorrect but it didn't matter because IR generation doesn't actually
apply the NRVO here. In C++0x, however, we were moving from an object
when in fact we should have copied from it. Fixes PR10142 /
<rdar://problem/9714312>.
llvm-svn: 134548
cast type has no ownership specified, implicitly "transfer" the ownership of the cast'ed type
to the cast type:
id x;
static_cast<NSString**>(&x); // Casting as (__strong NSString**).
This currently only works for C++ named casts, C casts to follow.
llvm-svn: 134273
vector<int>
to
std::vector<int>
Patch by Kaelyn Uhrain, with minor tweaks + PCH support from me. Fixes
PR5776/<rdar://problem/8652971>.
Thanks Kaelyn!
llvm-svn: 134007
arithmetic into a couple of common routines. Use these to make the
messages more consistent in the various contexts, especially in terms of
consistently diagnosing binary operators with invalid types on both the
left- and right-hand side. Also, improve the grammar and wording of the
messages some, handling both two pointers and two (different) types.
The wording of function pointer arithmetic diagnostics still strikes me
as poorly phrased, and I worry this makes them slightly more awkward if
more consistent. I'm hoping to fix that with a follow-on patch and test
case that will also make them more helpful when a typedef or template
type parameter makes the type completely opaque.
Suggestions on better wording are very welcome, thanks to Richard Smith
for some initial help on that front.
llvm-svn: 133906
deducing template parameter types. Recently Clang began enforcing the
more strict checking that the argument type and the deduced function
parameter type (after substitution) match, but that only consideres
qualification conversions.
One problem with this patch is that we check noreturn conversions and
qualification conversions independently. If a valid conversion would
require *both*, perhaps interleaved with each other, it will be
rejected. If this actually occurs (I'm not yet sure it does) and is in
fact a problem (I'm not yet sure it is), there is a FIXME to implement
more intelligent conversion checking.
However, this step at least allows Clang to resume accepting valid code
we're seeing in the wild.
llvm-svn: 133327
storage specifier is different from the storage specifier on the
template. If that storage specifier is the same, then we only warn.
Thanks to John for the prodding.
llvm-svn: 133236
checks that the deduced argument type for a function call matches the
actual argument type provided. The only place we've found where the
consistency checking should actually cause template argument deduction
failure is due to qualifier differences that don't fall into the realm
of qualification conversions (which are *not* checked when we
initially perform deduction). However, we're performing the full
checking as specified in the standard to ensure that no other cases
exist.
Fixes PR9233 / <rdar://problem/9039590>.
llvm-svn: 133163
in a noexcept exception specification because it isn't part of the
canonical type. This ensures that we keep the exact expression written
in the noexcept exception specification, rather than accidentally
"adopting" a previously-written and canonically "equivalent" function
prototype. Fixes PR10087.
llvm-svn: 132998
specializations within an explicit instantiation to default to off
(enabled by -pedantic). Nobody else seem to implement C++
[temp.explicit]p3. Fixes PR10093.
llvm-svn: 132704
specializing a member of an unspecialized template, and recover from
such errors without crashing. Fixes PR10024 / <rdar://problem/9509761>.
llvm-svn: 132677
the template parameter, perform the checking as a "specified" template
argument rather than a "deduced" template argument; the latter implies
stricter type checking that is not permitted for default template
arguments.
Also, cleanup our handling of substitution of explicit template
arguments for a function template. We were actually performing some
substitution of default arguments at this point!
Fixes PR10069.
llvm-svn: 132529
class type (or array thereof), eliminating some redundant checks
(thanks Eli!) and adding some tests where the behavior differs in
C++98/03 vs. C++0x.
llvm-svn: 132218
to be careful to emit landing pads that are always prepared to handle a
cleanup path. This is correct mostly because of the fix to the LLVM
inliner, r132200.
llvm-svn: 132209
so that it looks at the initializer of a local variable of class type
(or array thereof) to determine whether it's just an implicit
invocation of the trivial default constructor. Fixes PR10034.
llvm-svn: 132191
that the unevaluated subexpressions of &&, ||, and ? : are not
considered when determining whether the expression is a constant
expression. Also, turn the "used in its own initializer" warning into
a runtime-behavior warning, so that it doesn't fire when a variable is
used as part of an unevaluated subexpression of its own initializer.
Fixes PR9999.
llvm-svn: 131968
should use a constructor to default-initialize a
variable. InitializationSequence knows the rules for default
initialization, better. Fixes <rdar://problem/8501008>.
llvm-svn: 131796
to a warning, since apparently libstdc++'s debug mode does this (and
we can recover safely). Add a Fix-It to insert the "inline", just for kicks.
llvm-svn: 131732
nested-name-specifier, re-evaluate the nested-name-specifier as if we
were entering that context (which we did!), so that we'll resolve a
template-id to a particular class template partial
specialization. Fixes PR9913.
llvm-svn: 131383
nested of an out-of-line declaration, only require a 'template<>'
header for each enclosing class template that hasn't been previously
specialized; previously, we were requiring 'template<>' for enclosing
class templates and members of class templates that hadn't been
previously specialized. Fixes <rdar://problem/9422013>.
llvm-svn: 131207
that they are C++0x extensions, and put them in the appropriate
group. We already support most of the semantics. Addresses
<rdar://problem/9407525>.
llvm-svn: 131153
I've edited one diagnostic which would print "copy constructor" for copy
constructors and "constructor" for any other constructor. If anyone is
extremely enamored with this, it can be reinstated with a simple boolean
flag rather than calling getSpecialMember, which is inappropriate.
llvm-svn: 131143
the semantic context referenced by the nested-name-specifier rather
than the syntactic form of the nested-name-specifier. The previous
incarnation was based on my complete misunderstanding of C++
[temp.expl.spec]. The latest C++0x working draft clarifies the
requirements here, and this rewrite is intended to follow that.
Along the way, improve source location information in the
diagnostics. For example, if we report that a specific type needs or
doesn't need a 'template<>' header, we dig out that type in the
nested-name-specifier and highlight its range.
Fixes: PR5907, PR9421, PR8277, PR8708, PR9482, PR9668, PR9877, and
<rdar://problem/9135379>.
llvm-svn: 131138
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
in the classification of template names and using declarations. We now
properly typo-correct the leading identifiers in statements to types,
templates, values, etc. As an added bonus, this reduces the number of
lookups required for disambiguation.
llvm-svn: 130288
member function, i.e. something of the form 'x.f' where 'f' is a non-static
member function. Diagnose this in the general case. Some of the new diagnostics
are probably worse than the old ones, but we now get this right much more
universally, and there's certainly room for improvement in the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 130239
named by the nested-name-specifier is same or base of the class in which the member expression appears.
It seems we also had an ill-formed test case, mon dieu! Fixes rdar://8576107.
llvm-svn: 129493
weak linkage. Also, fix a problem where global weak variables
with non-trivial initializers were getting guard variables, or at
least were checking for them and then crashing.
llvm-svn: 129342
when the resolution took place due to a single template specialization
being named with an explicit template argument list. In this case, the
"resolution" doesn't take into account the target type at all, and
therefore can take place for functions, static member functions, and
*non-static* member functions. The latter weren't being properly checked
and their proper form enforced in this scenario. We now do so.
The result of this last form slipping through was some confusing logic
in IsStandardConversion handling of these resolved address-of
expressions which eventually exploded in an assert. Simplify this logic
a bit and add some more aggressive asserts to catch improperly formed
expressions getting into this routine.
Finally add systematic testing of member functions, both static and
non-static, in the various forms they can take. One of these is
essentially PR9563, and this commit fixes the crash in that PR. However,
the diagnostics for this are still pretty terrible. We at least are now
accepting the correct constructs and rejecting the invalid ones rather
than accepting invalid or crashing as before.
llvm-svn: 128456
overload, so that we actually do the resolution for full expressions
and emit more consistent, useful diagnostics. Also fixes an IRGen
crasher, where Sema wouldn't diagnose a resolvable bound member
function template-id used in a full-expression (<rdar://problem/9108698>).
llvm-svn: 127747
Change the interface to expose the new information and deal with the enormous fallout.
Introduce the new ExceptionSpecificationType value EST_DynamicNone to more easily deal with empty throw specifications.
Update the tests for noexcept and fix the various bugs uncovered, such as lack of tentative parsing support.
llvm-svn: 127537
of a C++0x inline namespace within enclosing namespaces, as noted in
C++0x [namespace.def]p8.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9006349>, a libc++ failure where Clang was
rejected an explicit specialization of std::swap (since libc++ puts it
into an inline, versioned namespace std::__1).
llvm-svn: 127162
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
* 'auto' was being rejected on abstract-declarators with trailing return
types and on typedefs with trailing return types. 'auto' is always
allowed in these cases. This was found while testing the fix for PR 9278.
* A very poor diagnostic was being issued for auto (f() -> int): "return
type must be 'auto', not 'auto'". This is closely related to PR 9060.
* Trailing return type handling was happening slightly too late,
resulting in the checks for functions returning arrays and functions
returning functions being missed.
llvm-svn: 126166
This actually rules out too much, since it also catches typedefs for pointers to functions with trailing return types:
typedef auto (*F)() -> int;
Fix for that (and the same issue in all abstract-declarators) to follow shortly.
llvm-svn: 126153
* Flag indicating 'we're parsing this auto typed variable's initializer' moved from VarDecl to Sema
* Temporary template parameter list for auto deduction is now allocated on the stack.
* Deduced 'auto' types are now uniqued.
llvm-svn: 126139
includes explicitly-specified template arguments) to a function
template specialization in cases where no deduction is performed or
deduction fails. Patch by Faisal Vali, fixes PR7505!
llvm-svn: 126048
a scoped enumeration type to an integral or floating type,
properly. There was an over-eager assertion, and it was missing the
floating-point case.
Fixes PR9107/<rdar://problem/8937402>.
llvm-svn: 125825
LabelDecl and LabelStmt. There is a 1-1 correspondence between the
two, but this simplifies a bunch of code by itself. This is because
labels are the only place where we previously had references to random
other statements, causing grief for AST serialization and other stuff.
This does cause one regression (attr(unused) doesn't silence unused
label warnings) which I'll address next.
This does fix some minor bugs:
1. "The only valid attribute " diagnostic was capitalized.
2. Various diagnostics printed as ''labelname'' instead of 'labelname'
3. This reduces duplication of label checking between functions and blocks.
Review appreciated, particularly for the cindex and template bits.
llvm-svn: 125733
parameter type to see what's behind it, so that we don't end up
printing silly things like "float const *" when "const float *" would
make more sense. Also, replace the pile of "isa" tests with a simple
switch enumerating all of the cases, making a few more obvious cases
use prefix qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 125729
the parser will complete the declarator with a valid decl and thus trigger
delayed diagnostics for it. It certainly looks like we were intentionally
returning null here, but I couldn't find any good reason for it, and there
wasn't a comment, so farewell to all that.
llvm-svn: 125556
access-control diagnostics which arise from the portion of the declarator
following the scope specifier, just in case access is granted by
friending the individual method. This can also happen with in-line
member function declarations of class templates due to templated-scope
friend declarations.
We were really playing fast-and-loose before with this sort of thing,
and it turned out to work because *most* friend functions are in file
scope. Making us delay regardless of context exposed several bugs with
how we were manipulating delay. I ended up needing a concept of a
context that's independent of the declarations in which it appears,
and then I actually had to make some things save contexts correctly,
but delay should be much cleaner now.
I also encapsulated all the delayed-diagnostics machinery in a single
subobject of Sema; this is a pattern we might want to consider rolling
out to other components of Sema.
llvm-svn: 125485
- BlockDeclRefExprs always store VarDecls
- BDREs no longer store copy expressions
- BlockDecls now store a list of captured variables, information about
how they're captured, and a copy expression if necessary
With that in hand, change IR generation to use the captures data in
blocks instead of walking the block independently.
Additionally, optimize block layout by emitting fields in descending
alignment order, with a heuristic for filling in words when alignment
of the end of the block header is insufficient for the most aligned
field.
llvm-svn: 125005
it's okay for the following template parameters to not have default
arguments (since those template parameters can still be
deduced). Also, downgrade the error about default template arguments
in function templates to an extension warning, since this is a
harmless C++0x extension.
llvm-svn: 124855
argument but doesn't (because previous template parameters had default
arguments), clear out all of the default arguments so that we maintain
the invariant that a template parameter has a default argument only if
subsequence template parameters also have default arguments.
Fixes a crash-on-invalid <rdar://problem/8913649>.
llvm-svn: 124345
derived-to-base cast that also casts away constness (one of the cases
for static_cast followed by const_cast) would be treated as a bit-cast
rather than a derived-to-base class, causing miscompiles and
heartburn.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8913298>.
llvm-svn: 124340
overload a function without a ref-qualifier (C++0x
[over.load]p2). This, apparently, completes the implementation of
rvalue references for *this.
llvm-svn: 124321
reference binding is for the implicit object parameter of a member
function with a ref-qualifier. My previous comment, that we didn't
need to track this explicitly, was wrong: we do in fact get
rvalue-references-prefer-rvalues overloading with ref-qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 124313
the presence and form of a ref-qualifier. Note that we do *not* yet
implement the restriction in C++0x [over.load]p2 that requires either
all non-static functions with a given parameter-type-list to have a
ref-qualifier or none of them to have a ref-qualifier.
llvm-svn: 124297
- Add ref-qualifiers to the type system; they are part of the
canonical type. Print & profile ref-qualifiers
- Translate the ref-qualifier from the Declarator chunk for
functions to the function type.
- Diagnose mis-uses of ref-qualifiers w.r.t. static member
functions, free functions, constructors, destructors, etc.
- Add serialization and deserialization of ref-qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 124281
for reference binding (C++ [over.rank.ics]p3b1sb4), so that we prefer
the binding of an lvalue reference to a function lvalue over the
binding of an rvalue reference. This change resolves the ambiguity
with std::forward and lvalue references to function types in a way
that seems consistent with the original rvalue references proposal.
My proposed wording for this change is shown in
isBetterReferenceBindingKind(); we'll try to get this change adopted
in the C++0x working paper as well.
llvm-svn: 124236
(C++0x [over.ics.rank]p3) when one binding is an lvalue reference and
the other is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue. In
particular, we were using the predict "is an rvalue reference" rather
than "is an rvalue reference that binds to an rvalue", which was
incorrect in the one case where an rvalue reference can bind to an
lvalue: function references.
This particular issue cropped up with std::forward, where Clang was
picking an std::forward overload while forwarding an (lvalue)
reference to a function. However (and unfortunately!), the right
answer for this code is that the call to std::forward is
ambiguous. Clang now gets that right, but we need to revisit the
std::forward implementation in libc++.
llvm-svn: 124216
T) when taking the address of an overloaded function or matching a
specialization to a template (C++0x [temp.deduct.type]p10). Fixes
PR9044.
llvm-svn: 124197
implementation used by overload resolution to support rvalue
references. The original commits caused PR9026 and some
hard-to-reproduce self-host breakage.
The only (crucial!) difference between this commit and the previous
commits is that we now properly check the SuppressUserConversions flag
before attempting to perform a second user-defined conversion in
reference binding, breaking the infinite recursion chain of
user-defined conversions.
Rvalue references should be working a bit better now.
llvm-svn: 124121
when returning an NRVO candidate expression. For example, this
properly picks the move constructor when dealing with code such as
MoveOnlyType f() { MoveOnlyType mot; return mot; }
The previously-XFAIL'd rvalue-references test case now works, and has
been moved into the appropriate paragraph-specific test case.
llvm-svn: 123992
resolution to match the latest C++0x working paper's semantics. The
implementation now matching up with the reference-binding
implementation used for initialization.
llvm-svn: 123977
call (C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p3).
As part of this, start improving the reference-binding implementation
used in the computation of implicit conversion sequences (for overload
resolution) to reflect C++0x semantics. It still needs more work and
testing, of course.
llvm-svn: 123966
specification. In particular, an rvalue reference can bind to an
initializer expression that is an lvalue if the referent type and the
initializer expression type are not reference-related. This is a newer
formulation to the previous "rvalue references can never bind to
lvalues" rule.
llvm-svn: 123952
working paper's structure. The only functional change here is that we
now handling binding to array rvalues, which we would previously reject.
llvm-svn: 123918
involving rvalue references, to start scoping out what is and what
isn't implemented. In the process, tweak some standards citations,
type desugaring, and teach the tentative parser about && in
ptr-operator.
llvm-svn: 123913
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
number of explicit call arguments. This actually fixes an erroneous
test for [temp.deduct.partial]p11, where we were considering
parameters corresponding to arguments beyond those that were
explicitly provided.
llvm-svn: 123244
parameters it expanded to, map exactly the number of function
parameters that were expanded rather than just running to the end of
the instantiated parameter list. This finishes the implementation of
the last sentence of C++0x [temp.deduct.call]p1.
llvm-svn: 123213
sentence of [temp.deduct.call]p1, both of which concern the
non-deducibility of parameter packs not at the end of a
parameter-type-list. The latter isn't fully implemented yet; see the
new FIXME.
llvm-svn: 123210
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
pack expansions in template argument lists and function parameter
lists. The implementation of this paragraph should be complete
*except* for cases where we're substituting into one of the unexpanded
packs in a pack expansion; that's a general issue I haven't solved yet.
llvm-svn: 123188
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
tuple class template. This implementation is boosted directly from the
variadic templates proposal. N2080.
Note that one section is #ifdef'd out. I'll implement that aspect of
template argument deduction next.
llvm-svn: 123016
parameters into parameter types, so that substitution of
explicitly-specified function template arguments uses the same
path. This enables the use of explicitly-specified function template
arguments with variadic templates.
llvm-svn: 122986
template whose last parameter is a parameter pack. This allows us to
form a call to, e.g.,
template<typename ...Args1, typename ...Args2>
void f(std::pair<Args1, Args2> ...pairs);
given zero or more instances of "pair".
llvm-svn: 122973
1) Declaration of function parameter packs
2) Instantiation of function parameter packs within function types.
3) Template argument deduction of function parameter packs when
matching two function types.
We're missing all of the important template-instantiation logic for
function template definitions, along with template argument deduction
from the argument list of a function call, so don't even think of
trying to use these for real yet.
llvm-svn: 122926
expansions with something that is easier to use correctly: a new
template argment kind, rather than a bit on an existing kind. Update
all of the switch statements that deal with template arguments, fixing
a few latent bugs in the process. I"m happy with this representation,
now.
And, oh look! Template instantiation and deduction work for template
template argument pack expansions.
llvm-svn: 122896
for template template argument pack expansions. This allows fun such
as:
template<template<class> class ...> struct apply_impl { /*...*/ };
template<template<class> class ...Metafunctions> struct apply {
typedef typename apply_impl<Metafunctions...>::type type;
};
However, neither template argument deduction nor template
instantiation is implemented for template template argument packs, so
this functionality isn't useful yet.
I'll probably replace the encoding of template template
argument pack expansions in TemplateArgument so that it's harder to
accidentally forget about the expansion. However, this is a step in
the right general direction.
llvm-svn: 122890
specializations. We weren't dealing with any of the cases where the
type of the non-type template argument differs from the type of the
corresponding template parameter in the primary template. We would
think that the template parameter in the partial specialization was
not deducible (and warn about it, incorrectly), then fail to convert a
deduced parameter to the type of the template parameter in the partial
specialization (which may involve truncation, among other
things). Fixes PR8905.
llvm-svn: 122851
declaration name of the array when present. This ensures that
a poor-man's C++03 static_assert will include the user error message
often embedded in the name.
Update all the tests to reflect the new wording, and add a test for the
name behavior.
llvm-svn: 122802
template argument (described by an expression, of course). For
example:
template<int...> struct int_tuple { };
template<int ...Values>
struct square {
typedef int_tuple<(Values*Values)...> type;
};
It also lays the foundation for pack expansions in an initializer-list.
llvm-svn: 122751
caused an assertion when dealing with non-type template parameter
packs. Add some tests for deduction and instantiation of non-type
template parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122534
extract the appropriate argument from the argument pack (based on the
current substitution index, of course). Simple instantiation of pack
expansions involving non-type template parameter packs now works.
llvm-svn: 122532
packs, e.g.,
template<typename T, unsigned ...Dims> struct multi_array;
along with semantic analysis support for finding unexpanded non-type
template parameter packs in types, expressions, and so on.
Template instantiation involving non-type template parameter packs
probably doesn't work yet. That'll come soon.
llvm-svn: 122527
parameter packs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p13), including disambiguation between
unnamed function parameter packs and varargs (C++0x [dcl.fct]p14) for
cases like
void f(T...)
where T may or may not contain unexpanded parameter packs.
llvm-svn: 122520
specialization's template arguments against the primary template's
template arguments using the obvious, correct method of checking the
injected-class-name type (C++ [temp.class.spec]p9b3). The previous
incarnation of this comparison attempted to use its own formulation of
the injected-class-name, which is redudant and, with the introduction
of variadic templates, became wrong (again).
llvm-svn: 122508
template argument corresponding to a template parameter pack is an
argument pack of a pack expansion of that template parameter
pack. Implements C++0x [temp.dep.type]p2 (at least, as much of it as
we can).
llvm-svn: 122498
parameter packs. In particular, a parameter pack not otherwise deduced
is deduced to an empty parameter pack.
The C++0x wording here is a bit unfortunate; this should really only
apply to function templates, and it mentions "trailing" parameter
packs, which doesn't really make sense in the context of function
templates. Will file a core issue separately.
llvm-svn: 122463
the presence of a pack expansion anywhere except at the end of a
template-argument-list causes the entire template-argument-list to be
a non-deduced context.
llvm-svn: 122461
single routine. Extend that routine to handle consistency
checking for template argument packs, so that we can compare the
deduced packs for template parameter packs across different pack
expansions.
llvm-svn: 122452
pattern is a template argument, which involves repeatedly deducing
template arguments using the pattern of the pack expansion, then
bundling the resulting deductions into an argument pack.
We can now handle a variety of simple list-handling metaprograms using
variadic templates. See, e.g., the new "count" metaprogram.
llvm-svn: 122439
dependent template specialization type, the number of template
arguments need not match precisely. Rather than checking the number of
arguments eagerly (which does not consider argument packs), let the
deduction routine for template argument lists cope with too many/too
few arguments.
llvm-svn: 122425
deduction. Unify all of the looping over template arguments for
deduction purposes into a single place, where argument pack expansion
occurs; this is also the hook for deducing from pack expansions, which
itself is not yet implemented.
For now, at least we can handle a basic "count" metafunction written
with variadics. See the new test for the formulation that works.
llvm-svn: 122418
Douglas Gregor