expression with the original call operator, so that we don't try to
separately instantiate the call operator. Test and tweak a few more
bits for template instantiation of lambda expressions.
llvm-svn: 150440
expressions. This is mostly a simple refact, splitting the main "start
a lambda expression" function into smaller chunks that are driven
either from the parser (Sema::ActOnLambdaExpr) or during AST
transformation (TreeTransform::TransformLambdaExpr). A few minor
interesting points:
- Added new entry points for TreeTransform, so that we can
explicitly establish the link between the lambda closure type in the
template and the lambda closure type in the instantiation.
- Added a bit into LambdaExpr specifying whether it had an explicit
result type or not. We should have had this anyway.
This code is 'lightly' tested.
llvm-svn: 150417
1358, 1360, 1452 and 1453.
- Instantiations of constexpr functions are always constexpr. This removes the
need for separate declaration/definition checking, which is now gone.
- This makes it possible for a constexpr function to be virtual, if they are
only dependently virtual. Virtual calls to such functions are not constant
expressions.
- Likewise, it's now possible for a literal type to have virtual base classes.
A constexpr constructor for such a type cannot actually produce a constant
expression, though, so add a special-case diagnostic for a constructor call
to such a type rather than trying to evaluate it.
- Classes with trivial default constructors (for which value initialization can
produce a fully-initialized value) are considered literal types.
- Classes with volatile members are not literal types.
- constexpr constructors can be members of non-literal types. We do not yet use
static initialization for global objects constructed in this way.
llvm-svn: 150359
id-expression 'x' will compute the type based on the assumption that
'x' will be captured, even if it isn't captured, per C++11
[expr.prim.lambda]p18. There are two related refactors that go into
implementing this:
1) Split out the check that determines whether we should capture a
particular variable reference, along with the computation of the
type of the field, from the actual act of capturing the
variable.
2) Always compute the result of decltype() within Sema, rather than
AST, because the decltype() computation is now context-sensitive.
llvm-svn: 150347
default is '=', and reword the warning about explicitly capturing
'this' in such lambdas to indicate that only explicit capture is
banned.
Introduce Fix-Its for this and other "save the programmer from
themself" rules regarding what can be explicitly captured and what
must be implicitly captured.
llvm-svn: 150256
nested captures. We currently don't get odr-use correct in array
bounds, so that bit is commented out while we sort out what we need to
do.
llvm-svn: 150255
have finished parsing the body, so that name lookup will never find
anything within the closure type. Then, add this operator() and the
conversion function (if available) before completing the class.
llvm-svn: 150252
incomplete class type which has an overloaded operator&, it's now just
unspecified whether the overloaded operator or the builtin is used.
llvm-svn: 150234
[expr.prim.lambda]p4, including the current suggested resolution of
core isue 975, which allows multiple return statements so long as the
types match. ExtWarn when user code is actually making use of this
extension.
llvm-svn: 150168
- Complete the lambda class when we finish the lambda expression
(previously, it was left in the "being completed" state)
- Actually return the LambdaExpr object and bind to the resulting
temporary when needed.
- Detect when cleanups are needed while capturing a variable into a
lambda (e.g., due to default arguments in the copy constructor), and
make sure those cleanups apply for the whole of the lambda
expression.
llvm-svn: 150123
only add 'const' for variables captured by copy in potentially
evaluated expressions of non-mutable lambdas. (The "by copy" part was
missing).
llvm-svn: 150088
the sign bit doesn't have undefined behavior, but a signed left shift of a 1 bit
out of the sign bit still does. As promised to Howard :)
The suppression of the potential constant expression checking in system headers
is also removed, since the problem it was working around is gone.
llvm-svn: 150059
- Capturing variables by-reference and by-copy within a lambda
- The representation of lambda captures
- The creation of the non-static data members in the lambda class
that store the captured variables
- The initialization of the non-static data members from the
captured variables
- Pretty-printing lambda expressions
There are a number of FIXMEs, both explicit and implied, including:
- Creating a field for a capture of 'this'
- Improved diagnostics for initialization failures when capturing
variables by copy
- Dealing with temporaries created during said initialization
- Template instantiation
- AST (de-)serialization
- Binding and returning the lambda expression; turning it into a
proper temporary
- Lots and lots of semantic constraints
- Parameter pack captures
llvm-svn: 149977
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.
Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.
In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.
llvm-svn: 149776
* support the gcc __builtin_constant_p() ? ... : ... folding hack in C++11
* check for unspecified values in pointer comparisons and pointer subtractions
llvm-svn: 149578
This is a mess. According to the C++11 standard, pointer subtraction only has
undefined behavior if the difference of the array indices does not fit into a
ptrdiff_t.
However, common implementations effectively perform a char* subtraction first,
and then divide the result by the element size, which can cause overflows in
some cases. Those cases are not considered to be undefined behavior by this
change; perhaps they should be.
llvm-svn: 149490
- Actually building the var -> capture mapping properly (there was an off-by-one error)
- Keeping track of the source location of each capture
- Minor QoI improvements, e.g, highlighing the prior capture if
there are multiple captures, pointing at the variable declaration we
found if we reject it.
As part of this, add standard citations for the various semantic
checks we perform, and note where we're not performing those checks as
we should.
llvm-svn: 149462
Douglas Gregor